theFallGuy
BBQ Sketti and IPAs
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2008
- Messages
- 72,711
- Likes
- 68,587
I'm sure that flow of cash was totally coincidence
Correlation is not causation. It may give you some reason to dig deeper, but ultimately you need to show some connection between the two. Consider the current issue with Kushner. He held WH meetings with two companies that shortly after the meetings provided substantial loans to his family's businesses. That may give you some reason to investigate, but it doesn't in and of itself show any linkage between the two.
Oh you mean the thread where I said this:
"Oh, without a doubt they can both be true and I'm not saying the 130K rent was really the hush money. But the 130K payment was unique, both in timing and amount. It was a one-off payment and the amount is eerily close to the amount paid to Stormy. And the timing of the rent payment did not occur long after the payment to Daniels."
That's fully consistent with what I'm saying here. Correlations can give you reason to dig deeper and investigate, but they don't in and of themselves establish the connection you need.
Certainly, if I was investigating whether Stormy was paid hush money by the Trump campaign, I'd ask a lot of questions about this rent payment and try to get the back up documentation and communications showing it was legit.
Yep, that's the one. That was your response after you had already came to your own conclusion. Then your lawyer buddy took you to school and you then changed your position and agreed.
Correlation is not causation. It may give you some reason to dig deeper, but ultimately you need to show some connection between the two. Consider the current issue with Kushner. He held WH meetings with two companies that shortly after the meetings provided substantial loans to his family's businesses. That may give you some reason to investigate, but it doesn't in and of itself show any linkage between the two.
Just be sure you're not confusing tears for other salty bodily fluids, because it seems like the Dems are anything but crying over this conspiracy theory flame-out.
Below is a link to a story that contains the full interview summary at the end. Dems wanted to release the full transcript of the interview, but Republicans wouldn't let them.
Dems: Uranium One informant provided 'no evidence' of Clinton 'quid pro quo' | TheHill
No confusion. As all the Dim-o-shiet "leadership" are nothing but boldfaced lying backstabbing manipulative spin doctoring s.o.b.s to begin with, not one damn syllable that spews out of any them has a shred of credibility to begin with. That party need to die a quick death.
The only thing funnier than the Uranium 1 "scandal" is the whole Pizzagate nonsense. If you are looking for a really good laugh, go back to the Pizzagate thread and look at all of the posters who knew to their very core that it was legitimate. You'll see some familiar faces. You guys will latch on to anything the right wing propaganda machine dangles in front of you.