TrumpPutingate III: the beginning of the end

#4,351
#4,351
Mick said:
74def29a0.jpg
Click to expand...

Thanks for proving my point.
 
#4,354
#4,354
OuterBanksVol said:
Said it before and saying it again: Roger Stone is the key to determining potential "collusion" by Trump. If it happened, he was involved. His prediction (below) about Podesta seems like hard evidence he both knew that Wikileaks had stolen his emails AND Stone knew when they were releasing them. Ironically, Stone's ego is so big, he couldn't resist publicly bragging about the fact that he knew about this.

I believe this is by far the most damning real evidence that a conspiracy - Trump's Campaign coordinating with Russians - did in fact occur.

"Investigators were interested in statements Stone made in the final month of the 2016 campaign that strongly suggested he was aware of information the group had before it became public and when it might be released. In one instance, he wrote on Twitter that "it would soon be Podesta's time in the barrel." Weeks later Podesta's stolen emails were released by WikiLeaks.

As WikiLeaks was strategically publishing stolen emails in the closing months of the campaign, Trump also publicly said he loved the group. He mentioned WikiLeaks 145 times during the last month of the 2016 campaign."

Mueller asking if Trump knew about hacked Democratic emails before release - NBC News

Timeline emerges as Mueller probes Trump, WikiLeaks, Roger Stone - Business Insider
Click to expand...

Ahh it never fails, more media fascination with Trump-Russia collusion...daily hyperbole spins, week after week, month after month, after month, after month, after month.

In regards to this story 'angle', the evidence is still currently lacking of any collaboration between Stone and WikiLeaks. If I'm wrong, please post, and I'll gladly stand corrected as I support truth, facts and evidence.



ExcellentGlitteringAlaskajingle-max-1mb.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#4,355
#4,355
Mick said:
74def29a0.jpg



Election on November 8, 2016
Click to expand...

The messages show WikiLeaks’ post-2016 election attempts to continue communicating with Stone by providing pictures of an email exchange with CNN’s Andrew Kaczynski. Stone did not respond to the message.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#4,356
#4,356
SLICKYINC said:
Obviously you have never paid attention to Roger Stone before. That dude will say and do anything to be relevant.
Click to expand...

OuterBanksVol said:
Dude he PREDICTED a release of STOLEN EMAILS belonging to Podesta to a day. Explain that.
Click to expand...

Mick said:
First thing in the morning after the election Wikileaks sent him a private message. Your point is a bowling ball. You don't have one.
Click to expand...

You guys have serious reading comprehension failure. No wonder you get caught up in all of the Russian crap. There is no need to explain Stone, he is who he is and always has been. You guys are trying to connect the dots of a Russian "sex expert" to trump now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#4,357
#4,357
Mick said:
First thing in the morning after the election Wikileaks sent him a private message. Your point is a bowling ball. You don't have one.
Click to expand...

“The true copy of this exchange provided many months ago to the House Intelligence Committee demonstrates I had no ‘collaboration’ with WikiLeaks,” Stone said in a statement

“The content of the exchange with WikiLeaks shows neither any claim by me to have any information beyond what Assange himself had said publicly and reiterates the statement by WikiLeaks that I had not communicated with them prior to the release of the DNC emails that were both accurate and so damaging to Hillary,” he explained. “My frustration that whoever is manning the WikiLeaks Twitter direct messages is unaware that I had confirmed Assange’s claim to have Clinton material is also reflected. That was what I meant when I said WikiLeaks ‘leaks.'”

Even Assange doesn't respect Stone

“Stone is a bull****ter,” Assange said. “Trying to a) imply that he knows anything b) that he contributed to our hard work.”

Stone said his August 2016 twitter prediction that “it will soon be Podesta’s time in the barrel” was “based on the January 2016 Panama Papers exposure of the Podesta brother’s Russian business dealings with oligarchs close to Putin in banking, gas and uranium.”

A singular photo of Stone’s passport shows no foreign arrival stamps between 2010 and 2017. “My passport proves I never left the country in 2016. I did drop my card off at the Ecuadorian Embassy when I was in London to address the Oxford Union in February of this year, to punk the British media and protest the continued persecution of Julian Assange who I believe is an honest journalist with a stunning record for accuracy.”


Roger-Stone-passport.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#4,358
#4,358
Vol0725 said:
The messages show WikiLeaks’ post-2016 election attempts to continue communicating with Stone by providing pictures of an email exchange with CNN’s Andrew Kaczynski. Stone did not respond to the message.
Click to expand...

How do you know he didn't? Twitter was not the back channel. I believe Stone was under FISA surveillance and Mueller knows if he did or didn't. You know you dismiss many pieces to overall picture because you are afraid of what the picture might be. You are trying to use a paintbrush to finish the puzzle.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#4,359
#4,359
Mick said:
How do you know he didn't? Twitter was not the back channel. I believe Stone was under FISA surveillance and Mueller know if he did or didn't. You know you dismiss many pieces to overall picture because you are afraid of what the picture might be. You are trying to use a paintbrush to finish the puzzle.
Click to expand...

Would you rather he use crayons and draw pictures?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#4,363
#4,363
OuterBanksVol said:
Dude he PREDICTED a release of STOLEN EMAILS belonging to Podesta to a day. Explain that.
Click to expand...

“The content of the exchange with WikiLeaks shows neither any claim by me to have any information beyond what Assange himself had said publicly and reiterates the statement by WikiLeaks that I had not communicated with them prior to the release of the DNC emails that were both accurate and so damaging to Hillary,” he explained. “My frustration that whoever is manning the WikiLeaks Twitter direct messages is unaware that I had confirmed Assange’s claim to have Clinton material is also reflected. That was what I meant when I said WikiLeaks ‘leaks.'”

"I have been forthright about the fact that Julian Assange of Wikileaks and I share a common friend who has communicated with both of us," he writes. "I was simply told Wikileaks was in possession of 'political dynamite' that would 'rock Hillary's campaign,' and they would release it in late October."

"I had no previous knowledge of the subject of the disclosures, although I've speculated that it would be related to the Clinton Foundation. I've had no advance knowledge of the hacking of Podesta or anyone else. Nor do I believe that Assange is an agent of the Russians, a charge which is yet undocumented with proof and which he denies."

Stone tweets in response to the House Intelligence Committee hearing on Russian interference in the 2016 election: "It's only fair that I have a chance to respond 2 any smears or half truths about alleged "Collusion with Russians" from 2day's Intel Hearing."
 
Last edited:
#4,364
#4,364
Vol0725 said:
“The content of the exchange with WikiLeaks shows neither any claim by me to have any information beyond what Assange himself had said publicly and reiterates the statement by WikiLeaks that I had not communicated with them prior to the release of the DNC emails that were both accurate and so damaging to Hillary,” he explained. “My frustration that whoever is manning the WikiLeaks Twitter direct messages is unaware that I had confirmed Assange’s claim to have Clinton material is also reflected. That was what I meant when I said WikiLeaks ‘leaks.'”

"I have been forthright about the fact that Julian Assange of Wikileaks and I share a common friend who has communicated with both of us," he writes. "I was simply told Wikileaks was in possession of 'political dynamite' that would 'rock Hillary's campaign,' and they would release it in late October."

"I had no previous knowledge of the subject of the disclosures, although I've speculated that it would be related to the Clinton Foundation. I've had no advance knowledge of the hacking of Podesta or anyone else. Nor do I believe that Assange is an agent of the Russians, a charge which is yet undocumented with proof and which he denies."

Stone tweets in response to the House Intelligence Committee hearing on Russian interference in the 2016 election: "It's only fair that I have a chance to respond 2 any smears or half truths about alleged "Collusion with Russians" from 2day's Intel Hearing."
Click to expand...

You seem to have quit providing links.
 
#4,367
#4,367
Vol0725 said:
they're his quotes...copy/paste in google...will lead you to multiple sources.
Click to expand...

You don't think he could be lying? Seems to be a theme for the guilty pleas. We will see if we can throw that piece out as irrelevant or find a place to put it in the puzzle when information obtained from the FISA warrants comes out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#4,368
#4,368
Mick said:
You don't think he could be lying? Seems to be a theme for the guilty pleas. We will see if we can throw that piece out as irrelevant or find a place to put it in the puzzle when information obtained from the FISA warrants comes out.
Click to expand...

He could definitely be lying... not sure if he was involved in masterminding an hack or was an culprit per se...he's not my cup o tea personally, he's an flamboyant wanna-be poser often times. He's a fairly sharp guy, and could be a master manipulator of lies. No clue man.

This is an interesting watch:

Roger Stone Destroys Biased BBC Reporter - YouTube
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#4,374
#4,374
Mick said:
You going to bring Pence into this? What do you know about PencePutinGate?
Click to expand...

37 seconds into video...crickets...lol

Oh and to your question...Pence will be your new president after your friends kill Trump (per video statement @ 1:06), or ya'll get him impeached of course. So throwing Pence into the mix seems fitting, because they wanna kill him too...so I guess Paul Ryan will be your new president, or will he be allowed to lead either?
 
Last edited:
#4,375
#4,375
Vol0725 said:
37 seconds into video...crickets...lol

Oh and to your question...Pence will be your new president after your friends kill Trump (per video statement), or ya'll get him impeached of course. So throwing Pence into the mix seems fitting.
Click to expand...

Don't make me watch.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top