#BoycottNRA

Ask the same question to the tens of thousands of Vietnamese kids we killed as collateral damage during the war. Ditto kids in every major war we've fought in since the dawn of bombing.

I must ask.

WTF does that have to do with the subject at hand? Or are you just admitting you have nothing?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
You forfeit all rights once you start sexually abusing kids. Hiding behind religious rights and the second amendment doesn't absolve that. Sorry.

There was a way different way of going through that.

Sorry, not going to fly when the ATF and FBI burn a bunch of people alive.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
Lol I know right? I immediately thought Ruby Ridge and Waco when the confiscation talk came up. And then that dip**** OBV blatantly removes all doubt. 😂😂😂😂

Australia is always the go to argument. I don't understand how a country on the other side of the world, without a 2A has anything to do with the argument.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
There was a way different way of going through that.

Sorry, not going to fly when the ATF and FBI burn a bunch of people alive.

What? You mean they could have arrested him in town earlier that day and not followed him back to the compound? Or just starved them out?
 
I must ask.

WTF does that have to do with the subject at hand? Or are you just admitting you have nothing?

It's called "principle" Hog. I gather this may be a foreign concept to you. Kids getting killed is a horrible thing, yes? Regardless of who or where they are.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
What? You mean they could have arrested him in town earlier that day and not followed him back to the compound? Or just starved them out?

I was thinking of the fact Koresh offered to let the ATF inspect his armory before it all started.

But they declined.
 
It's called "principle" Hog. I gather this may be a foreign concept to you. Kids getting killed is a horrible thing, yes? Regardless of who or where they are.

If I were you I'd demonstrate I had some principles before attempting to lecture someone else.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Australia is always the go to argument. I don't understand how a country on the other side of the world, without a 2A has anything to do with the argument.

They faced the same problem. This ain't rocket science.

2A doesn't guarantee you any right to an assault weapon, tank, rocket launcher, nuke bomb, etc.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
They faced the same problem. This ain't rocket science.

2A doesn't guarantee you any right to an assault weapon, tank, rocket launcher, nuke bomb, etc.

Well it's a good thing all of the above are already restricted from civilian possession without a tax stamp. Well all but a tank, there are no restrictions on possessing a fully operational tank at the federal level.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Same old Hog. Can't hang on the merits / attack the messenger. Fail.

Your post had no merits. It was quite possibly the dumbest post of your storied career of dumb posts.

What happens in a foreign war has no bearing on the federal government murdering children on our own soil.
 
They faced the same problem. This ain't rocket science.

2A doesn't guarantee you any right to an assault weapon, tank, rocket launcher, nuke bomb, etc.
Most recent SCOTUS decision uses "in common use at the time". With the number of modern semi-automatic rifles currently in circulation, one could argue that they meet the "in common use" standard.

D.C. v. Heller; United States v. Miller.

But all this is moot because semi-automatic rifles are not technically an "assault weapon" because they are not fully automatic, ergo, the semi-automatic nomenclature.
 
Last edited:
Do you drive roughly the speed limit? Do you wear a seatbelt? Do you register your car? Pay Taxes? If yes, you already bend to the will of the government. As y'all like to say to me regarding Trump, "He's your President" whether I like it or not. Ditto to any new national gun regulations. They would be "your gun control laws" too. You're welcome to break them, but there would be potential consequences.

The Australian government banned automatic and semiautomatic firearms, adopted new licensing requirements, established a national firearms registry, and instituted a 28-day waiting period for gun purchases. It also bought and destroyed more than 600,000 civilian-owned firearms, in a scheme that cost half a billion dollars and was funded by raising taxes.

The number of mass shootings in Australia—defined as incidents in which a gunman killed five or more people other than himself, which is notably a higher casualty count than is generally applied for tallying mass shootings in the U.S.—dropped from 13 in the 18-year period before 1996 to zero after the Port Arthur massacre. Between 1995 and 2006, gun-related homicides and suicides in the country dropped by 59 percent and 65 percent, respectively, though these declines appear to have since leveled off. Two academics who have studied the impact of the reform initiative estimate that the gun-buyback program saves at least 200 lives each year, according to The New York Times.

The Australia Model for Gun Control Is Useless - Foundation for Economic Education - Working for a free and prosperous world

“A national gun confiscation scheme which reduced the civilian firearm stock by an astounding twenty percent and nobody can seem to find any clear evidence it caused a meaningful effect on the firearm murder rate? That’s not only embarrassing, it goes against everything they believe about the nature of the relationship between guns and murder rates.”
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
I figured out why some of you don't want to expand the background check system to include mental health.

beck-padded-room.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
The Australia Model for Gun Control Is Useless - Foundation for Economic Education - Working for a free and prosperous world

“A national gun confiscation scheme which reduced the civilian firearm stock by an astounding twenty percent and nobody can seem to find any clear evidence it caused a meaningful effect on the firearm murder rate? That’s not only embarrassing, it goes against everything they believe about the nature of the relationship between guns and murder rates.”

Bookmarked! Thx!
 
Advertisement





Back
Top