mr.checkerboards
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2010
- Messages
- 61,511
- Likes
- 101,367
I couldn't figure out how any of them were questionable. There is a point where they need to quit over analyzing every catch. If you need to look at it in super slow motion for 20 minutes (See Pig Howard) then it shouldn't be over turned.
Barnett will obviously have a long career in the NFL. However, he was hardly double teamed tonight. Just got dominated by a very good LT in Solder. Huge play to recover that fumble though.Amazes me how much Barnett was double teamed tonight. Cant wait to see what he looks like in a couple years. Gonna be elite
He bobbled it pretty clearly after step 1 and that 3rd step was out of bounds which meant it should have been overturned.
Don't take the bait.
Incorrect. Foot drug and kicked up pellets
3rd step was actually in.
You could only see the proper view on 1 angle though and they only showed it once. Guessing thats the one the ref saw to uphold the call.
We are talking about the same step. Only showed the replay where you could see it once on the broadcast.Maybe we are counting steps differently.
I am saying the 2nd step after he gained control he was clearly out. I thought it was the 3rd overall step but maybe it was the 4th but after he initially caught it he bobbled it
Barnett will obviously have a long career in the NFL. However, he was hardly double teamed tonight. Just got dominated by a very good LT in Solder. Huge play to recover that fumble though.
Correct. Was easy to see in the angle where the white endline was the background, couldnt see it on most of the angles they showed with the dark backdrop of the end zone