Trump refers to immigrants from Haiti and Africa as being from s***hole countries.

#501
#501
Trump is 100% correct.

Only liberals would try turning his comments into a “racism” discussion.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#503
#503
LouderVol said:
a lot of our ancestors were fleeing **** situations.

Religious prosecutions (Quakers, Catholics, everyone), hunger (Irish in particular), tyrannical regimes (just about everyone, Georgia was a prison colony), and poor living conditions that they couldn't improve.

that's why they came here, they were looking for a new chance that they didn't have in their country for whatever reason. We are the poor, the sick, the hungry.

I still believe they should go through the legal process but we shouldn't turn someone away because of the situation they were in or where they came from.
Click to expand...


Still not relevant to my point.

Those European nations were leaders and established.

These countries we are talking about are leaderless and chaotic. Who leads the transformation when a release valve is readily available?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#505
#505
Trump will be judged by the voters in 2018 and 2020.. All presidents make decisions they believe will help them in the next election...
 
#506
#506
Could you imagine if any Republican did this, what the media would do!!!
What a typical whiny liberal TN Dem! How did this idiot get elected???

Democrat shouts down black pro-life woman at House hearing, accuses her of ‘ignorance’

WATCH VIDEO IN LINK...guy's a jerk! ...F.Y.I. Same guy trying to impeach Trump too, LOL.

Democrat shouts down black pro-life woman at House hearing, accuses her of ‘ignorance’ | News | LifeSite

Steve-Cohen-framegrab_840x480.jpg
 
#507
#507
Funny how libs will constantly claim the South is a sh*thole full of awful people, but the moment you point out some country is, in fact, a sh*thole, they lose their collective minds.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#508
#508
Vols_Baby_Boomer said:
I asked you to be specific.
Click to expand...

I already gave you a quote from your link. that is specific.

here is another
Several negative reviews of the book have been published in the scholarly literature. Susan Barnett and Wendy Williams wrote that "we see an edifice built on layer upon layer of arbitrary assumptions and selective data manipulation. The data on which the entire book is based are of questionable validity and are used in ways that cannot be justified." They also wrote that cross country comparisons are "virtually meaningless."[8]
Click to expand...

here is the reference at the bottom of that. Barnett, Susan M. and Williams, Wendy (August 2004). "National Intelligence and the Emperor's New Clothes". Contemporary Psychology: APA Review of Books. 49 (4): 389–396. doi:10.1037/004367.

In 2009 Jelte M. Wicherts, Conor V. Dolan, and Han L.J. van der Maas conducted a new analysis of IQ in sub-Saharan Africa, which was critical of many of Lynn and Vanhanen's methods.[9] Wicherts et al. concluded that Lynn and Vanhanen had relied on unsystematic methodology by failing to publish their criteria for including or excluding studies. They found that Lynn and Vanhanen's exclusion of studies had depressed their IQ estimate for sub-Saharan Africa, and that including studies excluded in "IQ and Global Inequality" resulted in average IQ of 82 for sub-Saharan Africa, lower than the average in Western countries, but higher than Lynn and Vanhanen's estimate of 67. Wicherts at al. conclude that this difference is likely due to sub-Saharan Africa having limited access to modern advances in education, nutrition and health care.[10]
Click to expand...
here is pretty much exactly what I said the first time.

your third link contains about 3 or 4 more specific references as to how the information is off. try reading your own links before posting.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#509
#509
Vols_Baby_Boomer said:
They have no right to come or migrate to the U.S. As such, there's nothing wrong with not wanting people from a specific country. We, Americans, get to decide who we want and who we don't.
Click to expand...

Yes, we do. My point is that determination should be made based on a meritocracy. It is not the fault of the average Sudanese immigrant that they were born in a country with an incompetent and corrupt government in a mostly lawless society. They certainly do have refugees who are capable of contributing to American society and being productive citizens. They should be evaluated individually not on their place of origin.
 
#510
#510
allvol123 said:
Still not relevant to my point.

Those European nations were leaders and established.

These countries we are talking about are leaderless and chaotic. Who leads the transformation when a release valve is readily available?
Click to expand...

again our ancestors were fleeing the same bad situations. they could have stayed and fixed it just like any African/Mexican or anyone else that scares you or makes you feel inadequate. but they didn't. our ancestors took the release valve of America too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#511
#511
Vols_Baby_Boomer said:
Because they vote Democrat and support socialist/communist policies.
Click to expand...

Biopsyman said:
Trump will be judged by the voters in 2018 and 2020.. All presidents make decisions they believe will help them in the next election...
Click to expand...

He'll win, it's about actions, not words to the middle-class American people. Most respect his authenticity, but would never say it publicly, or they'd get crucified by the libby's who supposedly believe in freedom of speech so much.

I feel sorry for his opponents, gonna be hilarious when the 'rippin'' begins.
 
#514
#514
Vol0725 said:
He'll win, it's about actions, not words to the middle-class American people. Most respect his authenticity, but would never say it publicly, or they'd get crucified by the libby's who supposedly believe in freedom of speech so much.

I feel sorry for his opponents, gonna be hilarious when the 'rippin'' begins.
Click to expand...

I think he could win big or he could also get crushed...
 
#519
#519
lawgator1 said:
I think everyone realizes he did say it. His loyal 36 % loves that he did.

Don't know why he is denying it today as no one believes him anymore, pretty much on anything.
Click to expand...

more polls?? We all know how reliable those are, just like all the polls showed Killary in a landslide
 
#520
#520
LouderVol said:
I already gave you a quote from your link. that is specific.

here is another


here is the reference at the bottom of that. Barnett, Susan M. and Williams, Wendy (August 2004). "National Intelligence and the Emperor's New Clothes". Contemporary Psychology: APA Review of Books. 49 (4): 389–396. doi:10.1037/004367.

here is pretty much exactly what I said the first time.

your third link contains about 3 or 4 more specific references as to how the information is off. try reading your own links before posting.
Click to expand...


Wicherts at al. conclude that this difference is likely due to sub-Saharan Africa having limited access to modern advances in education, nutrition and health care.[10]
Click to expand...

Oh, so if you give people education, nutrition, and health care, their IQs magically go up? This is patently false and there is zero evidence whatsoever to support Wicherts' claim and actual studies show that no amount of education, nutrition, health care, etc. improves IQ. (see Minnesota Twins experiment that has been replicated a number of times). Surely Wicherts could produce a study supporting his assertion.

This study was released last year:
The power of cognitive ability in explaining educational test performance, relative to other ostensible contenders - ScienceDirect

lt;dr IQ differences have now been proven to account for the difference in student performance on test scores. Basically no amount of difference in home life, parents education, or parenting style has much of an effect at all. You're either smart or you're not and if you're not there is very little that can be done. Intelligence is genetic and hereditary.
 
#521
#521
Biopsyman said:
The voters.. All elections are about the turnout.. If his side shows up then he should win.. If not, not good
Click to expand...

Not to be too obvious but it's going to matter very much who is the other option. Without that we know basically nothing.
 
#522
#522
Liberal tool box:

1). You’re a racist bigot

2). Russia, Russia, Russia

3). Islamophobic, xenophobic prick

4). Who needs walls, I leave my doors unlocked (like hell you do)

5). Trump caters to the rich (do any of you have a 401-k? I’ll go with -no- for $800, Alex).

6). Socialism rules, just ask Venezuela

7). Free speech, free phones, free food... free Willy... only when it fits our agenda

8). Fox News is slanted, Morning Joke is as level-headed as they come

9). Deflect, deflect, deflect

10). Sean Hannity is a grand wizard, that illogical, racist SOB

11). Mama’s right (Clinton News Network), you’re wrong

12). If all else fails, you’re racist

Wash, rinse, repeat.....
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5 people
#523
#523
Biopsyman said:
The voters.. All elections are about the turnout.. If his side shows up then he should win.. If not, not good
Click to expand...

Understand that point...the media will be all out war smear attack, that's a given...the media loves a Biden-type, he might match him in a street fight behind the bleachers in rural America...who knows.
 
#525
#525
Vol0725 said:
Could you imagine if any Republican did this, what the media would do!!!
What a typical whiny liberal TN Dem! How did this idiot get elected???

Democrat shouts down black pro-life woman at House hearing, accuses her of ‘ignorance’

WATCH VIDEO IN LINK...guy's a jerk! ...F.Y.I. Same guy trying to impeach Trump too, LOL.

Democrat shouts down black pro-life woman at House hearing, accuses her of ‘ignorance’ | News | LifeSite

Steve-Cohen-framegrab_840x480.jpg
Click to expand...

Steve Cohen has always been a POS in shoes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top