Sstterry
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 19, 2012
- Messages
- 1,842
- Likes
- 2,051
I think he has probably devoted today to building the fences around his team and process. He's talking with the AD staff, assigning roles, establishing search parameters, the criteria to use in judging options, and forming a first list of priority candidates to approach.
Once that's done, he will probably make a few calls today to let those top candidates know that he'd like to talk with them in earnest tomorrow or early next week.
But he's going to keep all this quiet and in-house, because he doesn't want to distract from the SEC CG.
That'd be my guess.
"Coach in Waiting" are just words that mean nothing and can cause more problems in the future. I too would like to see Tee come back, just not as HC at this time.
No I just read it. Plain and Simple. If you dont like what I read feel free to no longer comment.
He should hire Jon Gruden...
Announce it at halftime of the game, blow up the college football world and tell them that The Vols are back!
Flipping the middle finger to all of the national media in the process.
I think they call and up the number a bit and see what he says...
No, I just think you're incorrect in your reading. You're trying too hard to find something that isn't in Phil's response.
It's not that I "like" your reading or don't like it, this isn't a case of feelings and hugs and love, it's simply that I think you're wrong.
Phil Fulmer is going into this search with a really good sense of what it takes to be a successful head coach in the SEC, and particularly at Tennessee. He has a lot of this stuff about criteria already deep in his bones. He doesn't have to brainstorm it in a room with the staff the way Currie probably did (or should have).
At the same time, he knows that no one person always gets it right, and that bouncing your thoughts off others makes you even better. So he'll do that, too.
Right now, he is leaving all options open as he initiates all that process.
If you think you see anything more than that in his response, you're misreading him.