Thunder Good-Oil
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 2, 2011
- Messages
- 49,563
- Likes
- 52,456
We had 10 years to rebuild that program and failed...That's not on him that's on the horrible AD's choices for coaches we ended up with..You can't blame him for all of that and plus Dooley took what was left of his last class to the music city bowl the following year....Both Dooley and Butch had time to build us up and look what they left us?...Lane can fix it...And I think he believes he owes it to us...Give him a chance.
Those things that I've listed aren't hurt feelings. Those were serious transgressions by the Lane régime.
I disagree that hes solely to blame. I think hiring Dooley has a lot more to do with that.
Obviously youd have him closely supervised for compliance. He didnt have any issues at Bama or USC did he? (I dont recall).
I personally dont think this administration wants Kiffin.Freak I like it, but I do have 1 concern. Any leak right now has to be assumed as part of the Currie/Haslam plan. Why does Haslam want him? Does he have so much dirt on Kiffin that he can be used to help him keep control of the AD, or am I over thinking this?
Well he had a losing record at USC which is very hard to do in the Pac12.
And it's Bama, if he did anything wrong we would never hear about it.
If hired, it would have to be a very short leash with a 20,000,000 dollar payout that doesn't drop over time if he walks.