undertakervol
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2007
- Messages
- 399
- Likes
- 218
Is it fact or speculation that Gruden signed an MOU?
Is it fact or speculation that Gruden signed an MOU?
What if hypothetically Gruden and UT executed a MOU or other agreement and he turned in his resignation to ESPN and was ending his contracts with his various endorsements??
What if hypothetically Schiano and UT executed a MOU or other agreement and he resigned from OSU??
So then we would be dealing with tortious interference of contract for Gruden agreement. Fraudulent inducement for Schiano and Gruden. Currie and UT AD and Admin could be on the hook for millions and millions of dollars in damages for both Gruden and Schiano. Fraud if proven can give rise to treble damages as pointed out by Exile as well as punitive damages. It is dizzying if you really think about it.
Now I have no idea what if anything was executed but if agreements were executed then this is going to get incredibly ugly and incredibly expensive. The Tennessee football program and Athletic Department would be FUBAR!
Depends on who you believe I suppose. Knuck and I, through different sources, have been saying that we believe Gruden signed an actual contract on the 14th. Believe us, or don't, that's the info we were told and that's what we brought here.
I've seen people here in the last hour yell at us for bringing the info, and then other people yell at knuck for NOT bringing info.
Knuck can speak for himself (when he wakes up) but I've said the exact same thing since the 14th. It is what it is, take it or leave it. Whether someone believes or thinks it's a huge troll isn't going to change what I was told and what I said here as a result.
He said in his post that Gruden had signed. Later said it made him vomit at what he heard.
Heres my take...
No way in hell did a MOU get signed by anyone with authority to sign one only for those same people to go to Schiano. Its plausible a MOU was executed with boosters and/or mediators and the Gruden camp. But makes zero sense that Currie is involved with Gruden, even gets a MOU executes, then decides Schiano is better and risks legal jeopardy. Makes absolutely zero sense.
What if hypothetically Gruden and UT executed a MOU or other agreement and he turned in his resignation to ESPN and was ending his contracts with his various endorsements??
What if hypothetically Schiano and UT executed a MOU or other agreement and he resigned from OSU??
So then we would be dealing with tortious interference of contract for Gruden agreement. Fraudulent inducement for Schiano and Gruden. Currie and UT AD and Admin could be on the hook for millions and millions of dollars in damages for both Gruden and Schiano. Fraud if proven can give rise to treble damages as pointed out by Exile as well as punitive damages. It is dizzying if you really think about it.
Now I have no idea what if anything was executed but if agreements were executed then this is going to get incredibly ugly and incredibly expensive. The Tennessee football program and Athletic Department would be FUBAR!
If that were to end up being the case, can you imagine the absolute toxic atmosphere among the major boosters? Currie would surely lose his job if not sued by the University for doing such a thing. Personally, and it's JMO, Gruden didn't sign anything so that's off the table. Schiano isn't out of a job at OSU so we may have to pay him something to go away. Ultimately, Currie has to be let go and Haslam has to be neutered by the rest of the boosters.
Gruden signed an agreement
Schiano signed an agreement which voided Gruden
Schiano backed out
Here we are?
Why dont people in the national media think Tennessee is a premier job in college football?
Money? - #2 in in revenue
Facilities? 102k Neyland, top notch training facilities.
Tradition of Winning? - Top 10 all time wins & Bowls
Fan Base? We packed stadiums for Butch Jones
Recruiting? I mean, even Butch could do it.
Education? - APR at all time high.
Coaching... all we have been missing.
So youre telling me that coaches dont want to come here because we havent had good coaches? Im lost here.
Go back and read LAVol1's excellent post. Currie was running a con, at the direction of Haslam. He didn't just decide Schiano was better. He strung Gruden and the rest of the boosters along and tried to slide Schiano in at the 11th hour.
Go back and read LAVol1's excellent post. Currie was running a con, at the direction of Haslam. He didn't just decide Schiano was better. He strung Gruden and the rest of the boosters along and tried to slide Schiano in at the 11th hour.
Depends on who you believe I suppose. Knuck and I, through different sources, have been saying that we believe Gruden signed an actual contract on the 14th. Believe us, or don't, that's the info we were told and that's what we brought here.
I've seen people here in the last hour yell at us for bringing the info, and then other people yell at knuck for NOT bringing info.
Knuck can speak for himself (when he wakes up) but I've said the exact same thing since the 14th. It is what it is, take it or leave it. Whether someone believes or thinks it's a huge troll isn't going to change what I was told and what I said here as a result.
So its possible that we may have have to pay Gruden and We still not get him as coach. If thats the case, I would be sick as well.
Easiest to calculate would be treble damages. Multiply actual damages times 3.
In my example with knuck, you would have to figure out what his actual damages are. Knuck quit his job. How much was he making? How much will it cost him to find a new job? Will he make less money at the new job? What about costs of relocating? Add all the actual costs up and multiply by 3 for treble damages.