Herbstreit coming after us

#252
#252
Hubbard said:
If that gets you through the day, good for you.

Let me know when you want to get back on topic and discuss.
Click to expand...

Currie crawfishin through a 3rd party on Schiano had as much to do if not more with a lot of UT people (not the fans) raising 3 shades of hell about this because they had to be informed out of nowhere what he was doing. They re motive was 2 fold Im sure. Schiano is d!#K and an average coach to boot and his name is connected to PSU and Sandusky (right, wrong or sideways)

The media jumps on twitter and some walmart poster boards and runs with the idea that the only reason UT backed out was fan pressure from the PSU scandal which is flat out false.
 
Last edited:
#254
#254
txbo said:
If the eventual hire has lackluster performance, it will last a lot longer.
Click to expand...

If Schiano’s hire was a guaranteed success? He wasn’t, of course. Might have to deal with a “maybe the other guy wouldn’t suck as much” on College Gameday. 30 second mention.
 
#255
#255
Hubbard said:
I appreciate the attempt at kind words.

You kind of faded in the end.
Click to expand...

How can I possibly doubt your sincerity? But I do. :) Winning doesn’t taste as good as you dreamed, huh?
 
#256
#256
butchna said:
How can I possibly doubt your sincerity? But I do. :) Winning doesn’t taste as good as you dreamed, huh?
Click to expand...

With you no one will really know.. anyways gotta go to the gym to work on those ruffles I ate over the Thanksgiving holiday.. since you fat shaming folks lol tough guy
 
#257
#257
butchna said:
How can I possibly doubt your sincerity? But I do. :) Winning doesn’t taste as good as you dreamed, huh?
Click to expand...

Sorry, your post are making less and less sense now.

Don't be embarrassed about the doubts. They can get you to considering and thinking.

A conversation is not about winning or losing. It is about an exchange of ideas and opinions. I just don't think you are willing to do that in a sincere manner.
 
#258
#258
Volz4lif3 said:
With you no one will really know.. anyways gotta go to the gym to work on those ruffles I ate over the Thanksgiving holiday.. since you fat shaming folks lol tough guy
Click to expand...

Hooked On Phonics audio version! Whilst your butt is swallowing the Exercise Cycle seat. :thumbsup:
 
#260
#260
Hubbard said:
Sorry, your post are making less and less sense now.

Don't be embarrassed about the doubts. They can get you to considering and thinking.

A conversation is not about winning or losing. It is about an exchange of ideas and opinions. I just don't think you are willing to do that in a sincere manner.
Click to expand...

When you sound this pretentious crap out in your head, before you hit submit? Do you...awww, who are we fooling? Yes sir...the answer is C. :lol:
 
#264
#264
Hubbard said:
You can't use the lack of evidence theory to condemn Schiano at Penn State and then reject it when discussing job offers to him. When faced with a lack of facts from the case, you use hypothetical assumptions as if they have validity because they are your opinion. Expect a challenge to those type arguments.

Your logic is crashing on you.

The millionaire is typically used to villainize a person when there are no supporting facts. Your usage was classic.

Nonetheless, it comes down to the fact that Schiano has had no implications against him related to crimes at Penn State.

Beyond that, he does not have the coaching resume that impresses the UT fan base. At this point, I am not sure our next coach will have a resume that impresses. If not, I hope his future results will.
Click to expand...

The problem with your attempt at logic crashes and other nonsense is you continuously confuse the definition of evidence and the definition of proof. There is plenty f evidence he doesn't have a job offer. He last had a head coaching job 6 years ago. There are a dozen coaching jobs, only ours has been connected with him in spite of the fact that most coaching searches leak and literally hundreds of reporters have been chasing them. Is it proof, no? Is it a evidence, yes. Sure, that of a null result, but with enough sampling - and there is plenty - it is quality evidence. Again, not proof but evidence.

Further, the evidence that matters isn't whether or not he could be convicted in a court of law. He couldn't. What matters is what happens with his past if there is a problem here later with anything related either to Sandusky, to Schiano from his past, or a separate issue with the program with Sexual Assault. Most programs have that issue every 5 - 10 years, and it can result title 9 investigation. You think his past wouldn't matter to the media, recruits and Title 9 investigators if it comes up here again? This isn't a hypothetical like you claim. Its a real problem the has encountered in the very recent past. That's why other programs won't touch him. They aren't looking for classical logic based arguments. They are mitigating risk - its a far, far different sort of analysis.

Also, I'm still not vilifying millionaires, but that's evidently the best straw man you got. I'll clear it up further for you. I'd feel different if we were talking about a maintenance man who worked at Penn State and had a double hearsay claim. Him, yes, we should hire. But we aren't talking about him, or that sort of position. The man is financially doing better than 99% of the fans. Its not immoral for the fans to choose not make his problem our problem. We aren't communally responsible for taking a risk to right a potential injustice to a man financially better off than the majority of ticket holders.

EDIT: Grammar errors.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
#265
#265
butchna said:
When you sound this pretentious crap out in your head, before you hit submit? Do you...awww, who are we fooling? Yes sir...the answer is C. :lol:
Click to expand...

It may sound pretentious to you but it is just normal conversation.

I wish you well and hope you beat your personal best in posts per day.
 
#266
#266
Volz4lif3 said:
We don’t do that anymore bud keep up..
Click to expand...

With what? Pretend Fireman protocol? :)


Seriously. I don’t doubt you’re an actual fireman., but whatever you think you’re going to achieve out of our little exchange? It ain’t happening. :hi:
 
#267
#267
glhal2814 said:
The problem with your attempt at logic crashes and other nonsense is you continuously confuse the definition of evidence and the definition of proof. There is plenty f evidence he doesn't have a job offer. He last had a head coaching job 6 years ago. There are a dozen coaching jobs, only ours has been connected with him in spite of the fact that most coaching searches leak and literally hundreds of reporters have been chasing them. Is it proof, no? Is it a evidence, yes. Sure, that of a null result, but with enough sampling - and there is plenty - it is quality evidence. Again, not proof but evidence.

Further, the evidence that matters isn't whether or not he could be convicted in a court of law. He couldn't. What matters is what happens with his past if there is a problem here later with anything related either Sandusky, to him from his past, or a separate issue with the program with Sexual Assault. Most programs have that issue every 5 - 10 years, and its can result title 9 investigation. You think his past wouldn't matter to the media, recruits and Title 9 investigators if it comes up here again? This isn't a hypothetical like you claim. Its a real problem the has encountered in the very recent past. That's why other programs won't touch him. They aren't looking for classical logic based arguments. They are mitigating risk - its a far, far different sort of analysis.

Also, I'm still not vilifying millionaires, but that's evidently the best straw man you got. I'll clear it up further for you. I'd feel different if we were talking about a maintenance man who worked at Penn State and had a double hearsay claim. Him, yes, we should hire. But we aren't talking about him, or that sort of position. The man is financially doing better than 99% of the fans. Its not immoral for the fans to choose not make his problem our problem. We aren't communally responsible for taking a risk to right a potential injustice to a man financially better off than the majority of ticket holders.
Click to expand...

You make a good point about evidence and proof. Although, I have attempted to use the term facts on a consistent basis.

I suggest that you confuse noise and evidence. There is the matter of true correlation and assumption. Those can be subjective and, I imagine, we differ in our opinion in this issue.

There is not righting of a wrong being considered in my discussion with you other than not accusing a man of criminal activity without any supporting facts. Theories, guesses, and hopes do not qualify as facts.
 
#268
#268
Hubbard said:
It may sound pretentious to you but it is just normal conversation.

I wish you well and hope you beat your personal best in posts per day.
Click to expand...

You’re a fake intellectual. Rot in your own juice. My post count isn’t a goal. Isn’t difficult at all. Can understand why those who struggle would hold it in fascination. :good!:
 
#269
#269
butchna said:
With what? Pretend Fireman protocol? :)


Seriously. I don’t doubt you’re an actual fireman., but whatever you think you’re going to achieve out of our little exchange? It ain’t happening. :hi:
Click to expand...

Haha dude thinks fireman in Memphis don’t have anything better else to do and we get cats outta of trees.. you’re a f’in idiot.. I don’t have nothing to achieve war hero.. what proof ya want bout me being a firefighter boss.
 

Attachments

  • E738341E-9501-4FB9-9322-466BB43797D2.jpg
    E738341E-9501-4FB9-9322-466BB43797D2.jpg
    53.9 KB · Views: 4
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#271
#271
Volz4lif3 said:
Haha dude thinks fireman in Memphis don’t have anything better else to do and we get cats outta of trees.. you’re a f’in idiot.. I don’t have nothing to achieve war hero.. what proof ya want bout me being a firefighter boss.
Click to expand...

That second paragraph too far down on the internet for you? :)
 
#275
#275
butchna said:
You’re a fake intellectual. Rot in your own juice. My post count isn’t a goal. Isn’t difficult at all. Can understand why those who struggle would hold it in fascination. :good!:
Click to expand...

Don't discount your achievements. Those are impressive. There is no way to match that pace and carry on business at the same time. Very impressive indeed.

Well, best of luck to you and yours.
 
Last edited:
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement



Back
Top