Who does that article pressure, or relieve pressure on, but saying that UT has concerns about gruden? If you believe he gave us the final no then it relieves pressure on UT by support the we didnt want him anyway narrative. It says UT has the upper hand because THEY made the call.
I dont buy that. The reason being its a straw man argument. You dont go as far as youve gone if you have those concerns. You just dont.
The timing of that article, which said nothing of substance.
If that came from Grudens side, it was to apply pressure to UT to get them to budge on a final piece of the negotiations.
Either way.. the article looked sloppy. It was weird. And it was so clearly a leak I think it was too strong of a move by either side.
Dont really have a conclusion about what it means overall. Just my read on the circumstances. I do believe it means the Gruden stuff isnt dead. I dont buy the AD putting that out as a means of showing they have the upper hand.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.