Lurkerin
Longtime Lurker
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2016
- Messages
- 957
- Likes
- 1,568
Was not me that said that.
I will say with somewhat disbelief that I am starting to think this could actually happen!
Dish had the option of a buildout path with an interim milestone (40% coverage) in March 2017 and a final milestone (70% coverage) in March 2021. They missed the interim milestone, so they have no choice but to go with their other option: an accelerated final milestone of March 7, 2020.
It's interesting how changing deadlines can sometimes dramatically alter the payoff matrix.
So someone (we assume a booster) sent MIT to inflate fan expectations by telling us a deal was done. Thus putting pressure on the AD to make it happen, because now the fans know about the deal. If it doesn't get done, we will assume the AD screwed it up.
The only question is... Did this deal actually exist? Or was it made up just to raise our expectations? If the deal actually exists, then this was a brilliant strategy. The people involved with the deal can't come out and say it themselves, so they use an agent (MIT) to anonymously get the information out there... So now, not only is there a deal, but the fans know about it. That backs the AD into a corner, which lines up with how MIT described the situation. It would also explain how MIT knows so much. He would be getting the information directly from the source.
Dish had the option of a buildout path with an interim milestone (40% coverage) in March 2017 and a final milestone (70% coverage) in March 2021. They missed the interim milestone, so they have no choice but to go with their other option: an accelerated final milestone of March 7, 2020.
It's interesting how changing deadlines can sometimes dramatically alter the payoff matrix.