TN404
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2009
- Messages
- 493
- Likes
- 471
Wrong. Wrong. Wrong.
To the first allegation: It would not be immediately known, there are requirements to post those documents, but it is not immediate. They would be subject to a records request, at which point the University would have 7 days to respond. However, you are assuming that anything has been drafted by the University. It could easily be that the University told JG's agent (orally) to draft the agreement.
In addition, if YOU had ever tried to request records you would know that they can deny them for being vague, over broad, or construe the request to not point at what you intended.
If you think that "all documents related to Jon Gruden's involvement with the University" would get what you want, you are sorely mistaken. "Any contracts executed between the University and Jon Gruden" may not hit because it had not been signed by the University yet (even if JG did sign it).
To your second allegation:
They may not begin paying a second coach, but there is ZERO reason they couldn't execute an employment agreement with JG while Butch is the coach. There is nothing in BJ's contract that prevents the University from interviewing, or HIRING, another coach (or 4).
Conclusion:
You have absolutely no idea what you are talking about. you're spreading false information that you came up with on the toilet. Why don't you go put it back there? Or, put it back where it came from - your ass.
Wrong. Wrong. Wrong.
To the first allegation: It would not be immediately known, there are requirements to post those documents, but it is not immediate. They would be subject to a records request, at which point the University would have 7 days to respond. However, you are assuming that anything has been drafted by the University. It could easily be that the University told JG's agent (orally) to draft the agreement.
In addition, if YOU had ever tried to request records you would know that they can deny them for being vague, over broad, or construe the request to not point at what you intended.
If you think that "all documents related to Jon Gruden's involvement with the University" would get what you want, you are sorely mistaken. "Any contracts executed between the University and Jon Gruden" may not hit because it had not been signed by the University yet (even if JG did sign it).
To your second allegation:
They may not begin paying a second coach, but there is ZERO reason they couldn't execute an employment agreement with JG while Butch is the coach. There is nothing in BJ's contract that prevents the University from interviewing, or HIRING, another coach (or 4).
Conclusion:
You have absolutely no idea what you are talking about. you're spreading false information that you came up with on the toilet. Why don't you go put it back there? Or, put it back where it came from - your ass.
Wrong. Wrong. Wrong.
To the first allegation: It would not be immediately known, there are requirements to post those documents, but it is not immediate. They would be subject to a records request, at which point the University would have 7 days to respond. However, you are assuming that anything has been drafted by the University. It could easily be that the University told JG's agent (orally) to draft the agreement.
In addition, if YOU had ever tried to request records you would know that they can deny them for being vague, over broad, or construe the request to not point at what you intended.
If you think that "all documents related to Jon Gruden's involvement with the University" would get what you want, you are sorely mistaken. "Any contracts executed between the University and Jon Gruden" may not hit because it had not been signed by the University yet (even if JG did sign it).
To your second allegation:
They may not begin paying a second coach, but there is ZERO reason they couldn't execute an employment agreement with JG while Butch is the coach. There is nothing in BJ's contract that prevents the University from interviewing, or HIRING, another coach (or 4).
Conclusion:
You have absolutely no idea what you are talking about. you're spreading false information that you came up with on the toilet. Why don't you go put it back there? Or, put it back where it came from - your ass.
wrong. Wrong. Wrong.
To the first allegation: It would not be immediately known, there are requirements to post those documents, but it is not immediate. They would be subject to a records request, at which point the university would have 7 days to respond. However, you are assuming that anything has been drafted by the university. It could easily be that the university told jg's agent (orally) to draft the agreement.
In addition, if you had ever tried to request records you would know that they can deny them for being vague, over broad, or construe the request to not point at what you intended.
If you think that "all documents related to jon gruden's involvement with the university" would get what you want, you are sorely mistaken. "any contracts executed between the university and jon gruden" may not hit because it had not been signed by the university yet (even if jg did sign it).
To your second allegation:
They may not begin paying a second coach, but there is zero reason they couldn't execute an employment agreement with jg while butch is the coach. There is nothing in bj's contract that prevents the university from interviewing, or hiring, another coach (or 4).
Conclusion:
You have absolutely no idea what you are talking about. You're spreading false information that you came up with on the toilet. Why don't you go put it back there? Or, put it back where it came from - your ass.
Wrong. Wrong. Wrong.
To the first allegation: It would not be immediately known, there are requirements to post those documents, but it is not immediate. They would be subject to a records request, at which point the University would have 7 days to respond. However, you are assuming that anything has been drafted by the University. It could easily be that the University told JG's agent (orally) to draft the agreement.
In addition, if YOU had ever tried to request records you would know that they can deny them for being vague, over broad, or construe the request to not point at what you intended.
If you think that "all documents related to Jon Gruden's involvement with the University" would get what you want, you are sorely mistaken. "Any contracts executed between the University and Jon Gruden" may not hit because it had not been signed by the University yet (even if JG did sign it).
To your second allegation:
They may not begin paying a second coach, but there is ZERO reason they couldn't execute an employment agreement with JG while Butch is the coach. There is nothing in BJ's contract that prevents the University from interviewing, or HIRING, another coach (or 4).
Conclusion:
You have absolutely no idea what you are talking about. you're spreading false information that you came up with on the toilet. Why don't you go put it back there? Or, put it back where it came from - your ass.
wrong. Wrong. Wrong.
To the first allegation: It would not be immediately known, there are requirements to post those documents, but it is not immediate. They would be subject to a records request, at which point the university would have 7 days to respond. However, you are assuming that anything has been drafted by the university. It could easily be that the university told jg's agent (orally) to draft the agreement.
In addition, if you had ever tried to request records you would know that they can deny them for being vague, over broad, or construe the request to not point at what you intended.
If you think that "all documents related to jon gruden's involvement with the university" would get what you want, you are sorely mistaken. "any contracts executed between the university and jon gruden" may not hit because it had not been signed by the university yet (even if jg did sign it).
To your second allegation:
They may not begin paying a second coach, but there is zero reason they couldn't execute an employment agreement with jg while butch is the coach. There is nothing in bj's contract that prevents the university from interviewing, or hiring, another coach (or 4).
Conclusion:
You have absolutely no idea what you are talking about. You're spreading false information that you came up with on the toilet. Why don't you go put it back there? Or, put it back where it came from - your ass.
FYI someone on reddit, u/Grizzlymint, that's been confirmed to have a picture of Jon Gruden in Knoxville allegedly from earlier this week (this part is unconfirmed) just posted:
"Man I can't wait for tomorrow"
When asked what's happening tomorrow he said "I guess we'll find out together. By 9 am cst we will find out as a family."
TIFWIW. He's seemed to be the most connected to this situation as far as message boards, even moreso than Beaver or other folks on here, but the cst seems a little odd. Not sure why ANYTHING having to do with Gruden would be relative to central time.
Yeah, sorry if I contributed to the garbage. Just figured we were talking military like it was bacon or scotch or some other side conversation. Love reading this thread.
