I'm seriously confused about the vitriol towards the "academic side" of the university. Without strong academics we don't have billionaire boosters coming down the line. It is a circle that must be connected. No one wins by hating the academics.
MAYBE something like this could be what coaches are afraid of??? Seems there has been a big push recently to move UT into a higher performing institution (which is good), but some of the things listed below may be what UT is doing to move in that direction. There was a post earlier that some on the academic side would not care if football disappeared. The phrase "do not bite the hand that feeds you" comes to mind, and that would not be a saying if people did not do it.
From: magazine.nd.edu/news/notre-dame-football-the-indisputable-importance-of-saturday/
Others questioned the firing of the coach when the institution so severely handicapped its coaches with unrealistic restrictions, standards and expectations. Many speculated that Notre Dame and college football had changed so much that the University could no longer be among the elite programs.
Some felt its academic standards and approach to athletics simply made it impossible to compete with other institutions playing by different rules.
...the conventional wisdom says that admissions standards in recent years have been tightened, that the kind of athletes who got accepted in the past are now getting turned away, and that for Notre Dame {football} to be successful the criteria must be relaxed. The admissions people will tell you otherwise; the standards have not changed.
It is, however, more complicated than that. For one thing, the University requires all of its students to enter college prepared to do college work, including more math than most high school athletes want to take and more than the*NCAA*stipulates. These requirements eliminate from consideration a good many of the nations best prep athletes.
The University, furthermore, is significantly better academically than it was even 10 years ago. While admissions standards for athletes have remained the same, selectivity for the rest of the student body is substantially more pronounced. So the academic credentials of the athlete and those of regular students are much less similar than in the past. That makes the athletes life that much more difficult. And, as the University has improved in recent times, there are no longer courses (as there were many years ago) in which to boost a*GPA, no majors in which to hide from demanding regimens.