Hawkpilot
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 27, 2014
- Messages
- 2,563
- Likes
- 4,438
Fair enough. And I appreciate your steadfastness. That said, in one paragraph you're saying done deal. And in the next talking about offers still being on the table for people to accept/reject. Not saying you're wrong. I've just not heard enough to say 100%. Help me justify those 2 statements above.
Fair enough. And I appreciate your steadfastness. That said, in one paragraph you're saying done deal. And in the next talking about offers still being on the table for people to accept/reject. Not saying you're wrong. I've just not heard enough to say 100%. Help me justify those 2 statements above.
Gruden accepted what he is talking about...done deal. Although there is no deal to be signed yet. Until there is there will be pushback because some people don't like giving up power.
I believe what hes saying is, according to his information, the deal structured between Boosters and Gruden has been agreed to and there are no snags. Gruden has said yes to their offer and hes been steadfast this time.
But, the deal has to get signoff by Currie, BOT, chancellor, etc. and the threat of the deal is rejected is pulled funding for future university projects.
Just my interpretation of what MIT is selling
If this is all going down how MIT says, the hang up seems to be admin signoff. Boosters went all in. Admin trying to see if they have the cards to call or fold and go with the deal
I believe what hes saying is, according to his information, the deal structured between Boosters and Gruden has been agreed to and there are no snags. Gruden has said yes to their offer and hes been steadfast this time.
But, the deal has to get signoff by Currie, BOT, chancellor, etc. and the threat of the deal is rejected is pulled funding for future university projects.
Just my interpretation of what MIT is selling
These are the same questions I have been asking for answers from him
