OrngeChkrboardVFL
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2014
- Messages
- 1,318
- Likes
- 1,106
I'm no lawyer and I have absolutely no inside information, but if what DOT reported was true and a buyout agreement was in place, couldn't there be a clause in that agreement to allow the university to form agreements with potential replacement coaches?
Here's a little information that was shared with me by a good friend who's a UT grad that has a business connection with another UT grad, and that UT grad is one of the larger boosters. The larger booster told him and he's passing to me.....so here it goes.
Currie, Peyton, Phil, and the powers that be are trying to land Gruden with the notion that Gruden bring Jim Bob Cooter on as the OC. The reason being is at some point, Gruden will want to retire and they want a clear succession plan in place for when that happens. Currie does not want to see the AD going through a coaching search in the future for some hire that has no ties to the program. The powers that be are trying to create a long term plan so that UT isn't in the situation of revolving coaches the way it's been the last 3 coaches. I have no information on salaries, dates, or any details whatsoever.
Again, this was told to me and I'm passing along to you guys. I do not claim it to be fact and I'm certainly not a troll. Nothing really earth moving but I do admit the vision of a long term plan sounds very good to me. Don't shoot the messenger.
not my first choice, but i'd take it.
not saying i'm buying it all either ... not you personally, i just can't imagine stoops un-retiring.
but i vould get on board after the nongruden disappointment subsided.
Its been a while, but I think employment contracts fall under the Statute of Frauds and have to be in writing to be enforceable. Maybe a Tennessee contract attorney can help.
It seems the info about Jones coaching for Kentucky conflicts with a lot of the rumors about the Bama game being it for Btuch.
It will be tough for me to get on board with Stoops after all the trash he has talked about the SEC.
Statute of Frauds is really "weird" in that contracts are required for things that absolutely cannot be executed within a 1 yr time frame and some requirement based on values (and other conditions). It's complicated. Way too hard to explain on a message board. No need to worry about that here.
