- Joined
- Sep 14, 2012
- Messages
- 11,565
- Likes
- 90,218
Never get the skinny jeans, but a decent fit with a little stretch is awesome. Once I got a pair of Lucky's with the stretchy stuff I never went back. It's just more comfortable.
Just say no to the fancy stitching or bedazzled jeans for men. There's a man code violation or two in there somewhere.
Why do some people poke fun at the 17-4 narrative?
I haven't watched the interview, but was assuming what Shoop was saying basically was "Bituli's role in a 4-2-5 is as the MLB" not "Bituli is our MLB in the 4-2-5" if that makes any sense.
Franks cracked under the pressure against UM. Im glad that he didnt get the tune up game last weekend to help his confidence. We need to blitz and bring the heat early and often. Cant let him start to get comfortable.
Also, if he doesnt do well, I think we see Del Rio.
First of all, there are great facilities all across the country. That is certainly one huge change in the last 20 years. All P5 schools have money, and most of the top half of each P5 conference have excellent facilities. Second, IMO, the recruiting budget is high because we had to recruit out of state more than other schools. It's not because we purposely allocate more. You have to find players, and as compared to UF, UGA, LSU, etc., we had to spend more to find them. The instate talent is a new phenomenon. It hasn't been the case, and that is what has been an obstacle. Talent in East TN is not great, and most talent in TN is 3 hours away, the same distance as areas out of state as well. The hope is that we continue to keep the instate talent, and the program should get better. The recruiting budget would also decrease.
While I think highly of my school, I am not sure that UT has been a top 12 job. I can think of 4 in the SEC alone that are higher, and 2 others are debatable. That leaves 4 other conferences. There are many things that go into that including recruiting advantages and the strength of the conferences. I do think that the increase in TN high school talent will raise the level of the job.
For the life of me I can't understand how Bituli wouldn't be our starting middle linebacker. The guy had more tackles in a game than any other Tennessee football player did since the late 80's or somewhere around in there. If Jumper starts it's a crime IMO.
For the life of me I can't understand how Bituli wouldn't be our starting middle linebacker. The guy had more tackles in a game than any other Tennessee football player did since the late 80's or somewhere around in there. If Jumper starts it's a crime IMO.
The elite period was twice that long. 89-93 should be included as well.
I'm curious though. You're on record saying that all schools currently have resources, so apparently we can't use our substantial resources as rationale for why some of us think we aren't where we should be. Now apparently many- according to you- don't have a grasp of what our historical standards should say about where our program should be. I'm just curious, what is your benchmark? Just happy to be here to watch some football?
I think UF feels they will be able to throw on us, test the CBs and Safties.
I think they take a shot right away - first or second play. Trying to give themselves a shot in the arm.
I just hope we are ready and don't help them.
I want to see us break their spirits early and often.
That team will straight give up if we start boat racing them.
Eh, aside from 1989, we had four straight years of 9 wins and an 8 win season in 1994. Sure, we played one less game then, but there is no guarantee that we win an extra game to hit double digits. We just won 9 games for the last two years.
The point is that a small stretch in our long history seemed to elevate the expectations, and the historical standard is out of whack by some. College football has simply changed. The difference between a school like UT and one like Oklahoma State or TCU or Oregon or even Clemson has shrunk. Those schools probably don't have as many overall wins as UT, but the money is all the same now. They make just as much as UT does, and they have caught up in resources and facilities.
You certainly do have a way of going to extremes. I guess I just like to watch football. Hell no, I was disappointed last year. I just stated that I expect to win the East soon. We have a great program. But historical standards can be thrown out the window. This isn't 1970 or even 1990 college football anymore. It's all big money, and right now, we live in Saban's world.
Can we get pressure without blitzing Saturday?
I'm not so confident leaving our corners/safeties out on the edges with the athletes they have. If we bring the blitzes, the better hit or we could give up some big plays.
Taylor, Kongbo, and Phillips have to step up and get pressure
We won the SEC in 1989 (tied) and 1990 (outright). Hard to pose an argument about those 2 years. 91 and 93 were as good as several seasons in the range you referenced except for blow out losses to Penn State in bowls. 92 saw us beat Georgia and Florida, but was a bit derailed due to the coaching turmoil. So I think it's an elite period.
I will admit that UT's history is streaky, but it is still elite. But to your point about what it means, I look at the top 10 today, and I see names like Alabama, Oklahoma, USC, Penn State, Michigan, and Ohio State. These aren't new money programs- in fact, they are fellow members of of the top 10 all time in wins and winning percentage. I'm not sure if fans of those schools are as reluctant to acknowledge their rightful place as our own seem to be, but to me, it shows that history and resources DO mean something.
Definitely have to jump on their heads QUICK.
Get it 17-3 or so.
None of this 3 and out **** early.
Impose our will with Kelly. And turn their garbage offense over . Make that swamp start emptying early 4th quarter
History is more important to fans than recruits tbh. A good chunk of power 5 schools are also at least comparable in facilities. In fact, until this current renovation...we were the only SEC school without 2 full size outdoor practice fields we had basically 1.5. Schools like Washington who were once great, then basically hit rock bottom, are back to "elite" in no time with the right guy at the helm, which imo, is more important than any past trophies as long as your faculties/recruiting budget are comprable.
We won the SEC in 1989 (tied) and 1990 (outright). Hard to pose an argument about those 2 years. 91 and 93 were as good as several seasons in the range you referenced except for blow out losses to Penn State in bowls. 92 saw us beat Georgia and Florida, but was a bit derailed due to the coaching turmoil. So I think it's an elite period.
I will admit that UT's history is streaky, but it is still elite. But to your point about what it means, I look at the top 10 today, and I see names like Alabama, Oklahoma, USC, Penn State, Michigan, and Ohio State. These aren't new money programs- in fact, they are fellow members of of the top 10 all time in wins and winning percentage. I'm not sure if fans of those schools are as reluctant to acknowledge their rightful place as our own seem to be, but to me, it shows that history and resources DO mean something.
far from being negative but through 2 games there have been way to many negative plays and 3 and outs. There seems to be a lack of consistency on the offense. I get some of the inaccurate throws, new qb and young wr.
I think UF feels they will be able to throw on us, test the CBs and Safties.
I think they take a shot right away - first or second play. Trying to give themselves a shot in the arm.
I just hope we are ready and don't help them.
I want to see us break their spirits early and often.
That team will straight give up if we start boat racing them.
Keys to victory
Run the football
Leave Justin Martin in Knoxville
