Halph66
We should've gotten the live chicken.
- Joined
- Sep 2, 2012
- Messages
- 14,428
- Likes
- 48,916
You seem to understand it here, but a couple of pages back you say they got two games wrong.
Oddsmakers aren't trying to pick the winner, they only try to get the same amount bet on each side for protection.
The initial line is a bit like a guess on how it might turn out, but it is influenced by things like how the betting public sees a particular team. Bama point spreads right now always start high to get bets on the other team. Sometimes it is not high enough to start with.
Either way the goal is an even split of bets between the two teams.
The "we can't beat Florida contingent of VN" are not going to be happy with this. They've been using our Indiana State game as their prima facie case for why our defense is bad and we can't beat the gators. And you come in here with your logic and data showing Bammer's defense performed worse than ours against a similar opponent. How dare you!!!! LOL
This thread is stupid. Trying to use stats from one Bama game to make the case that Tennessee didn't play so bad is ridiculous. Instead, let's use an appropriate sample size and compare the last few games. Bama's d is awesome with lots of playmakers. They're aggressive and can get after the quarterback. Our d is slow, hasn't done well against the run, below average at cb, and doesn't have any dominant playmakers.
How anyone is confident in this defense is baffling to me. Can we improve? Sure. Do I think we will? I have no clue.
Eh, AL allowed fewer yards per play on defense (3.95 vs 4.05) and had a higher avg yards per play on offense (7.45 vs 6.05) than TN and did so against against an FBS vs FCS opponent. There's no "win" here for UT in this comparison.
OTOH I think there's precious little to be gleaned from the IS game other than a nice scrimmage. The problem is that after watching a whole lot of fail of late regarding the defense some UT fans were hoping for a bit more "obvious" domination of an FCS team picked to finish last in the Missouri Valley Conference.
Bama fans have had no such concerns about their team of late (particularly on defense) so the "what's wrong with Bama" query is contextually meaningless.
I'm not sure that it is a rope-a-dope. Why use all your tools in the tool box to beat inferior talent.
Tennessee didn't use all their tools, in my opinion. Not one blitz that I saw. Why doesn't Tennessee get the same consideration.
It's my opinion that Georgia Tech is better than expected. I'm was glad to see our response when we were on the mat getting the knock out count. Tennessee survived and advanced.
I don't think that Georgia Tech played lights out against inferior talent. They weren't fired up, they were worn out, they survived and advanced.
And like I have through this entire tread. I will reserve my opinion of Tennessee vs. Florida until after the game Saturday.
#1 ranked team in the country, just handed the #3 team in the country its hat, defense looks dominant, offense is more than enough to win the SEC and get to the playoffs yet again imo. I personally don't see too much wrong with those guys.
Preseason rankings are just guess work. Nobody knows how good Florida State or Alabama are. The media just thought they were good in the preseason. Using preseason rankings as a tool in your argument of who is good and who ain't isn't a smart move.
We'll see by the end of the season how good Alabama is. I personally think this is the beginning of the end for Alabama.
They won't make it to another SEC Championship until 2020.
You don't find it concerning that our defense couldn't seal the edge against a glorified high school team?
Did Lyle tell all the sheep that the reason we couldn't get a push on the defensive line is because we didn't blitz? We shouldn't have to blitz to get pressure against ISU. Our front 4 should have dominated the LOS. I think we had 6 tackles for loss against ISU and that's inexcusably.
What's also concerning to me is that our offensive line didn't dominate the LOS against ISU. We saw too much pressure from their Defense. We had the strip sack and too many hits on our QB's.
We played a poor game against an inferior opponent.
There's nothing wrong with being positive, but, when being positive skews your reality, it's time to take a step back and look at things realistically. Bama has beaten Florida State and Fresno State. We've beaten Georgia Tech and Indiana State. Both teams may be 2-0, but Bama has played the tougher schedule thus far. Honestly, it's not even close. So to try and compare us with Bama is ludicrous. I would LOVE to upset the Tide, but I wouldn't put money on the game.
Preseason rankings are just guess work. Nobody knows how good Florida State or Alabama are. The media just thought they were good in the preseason. Using preseason rankings as a tool in your argument of who is good and who ain't isn't a smart move.
We'll see by the end of the season how good Alabama is. I personally think this is the beginning of the end for Alabama.
They won't make it to another SEC Championship until 2020.
There's nothing wrong with being positive, but, when being positive skews your reality, it's time to take a step back and look at things realistically. Bama has beaten Florida State and Fresno State. We've beaten Georgia Tech and Indiana State. Both teams may be 2-0, but Bama has played the tougher schedule thus far. Honestly, it's not even close. So to try and compare us with Bama is ludicrous. I would LOVE to upset the Tide, but I wouldn't put money on the game.
The "we can't beat Florida contingent of VN" are not going to be happy with this. They've been using our Indiana State game as their prima facie case for why our defense is bad and we can't beat the gators. And you come in here with your logic and data showing Bammer's defense performed worse than ours against a similar opponent. How dare you!!!! LOL
Hurts isn't playing well against a good secondary, and the Alabama D isn't good in the secondary. As a result you can gash them right up the middle of the field, which is what Fresno did.
