volfannbama
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 9, 2010
- Messages
- 16,406
- Likes
- 20,215
I loved the speed and passion we played with. Guys we flowing to the football extremely well. I also loved how our players physically looked. KMac looked in phenomenal shape. I also loved the conditioning of our guys to play as many snaps as they did.
Overall I saw a lot more positives from the defense MOVING FORWARD than negatives.
You guys problem is you can't get it out of your head that we couldn't stop Georgia Tech's option attack. So you assume that means the defense will struggle moving forward. That couldn't be further from the truth. We didn't struggle against Georgia Tech for reasons that can be exploited by traditional offenses. For example it's not like we dont have speed on defense. We do. Especially when it comes to Bituli, Warrior, and Abernathy. We didn't struggle because our guys could stand up at the point of attack. We rarely lined up at the line of scrimmage. We were a couple of yards out every play so our guys could protect their knees. And so on.
There's nothing a traditional offense can point to from Monday night and say we can attack that (other than Justin Martin). Everything else we struggled with was related solely to the option scheme and has no bearing on the rest of our opponents.
So when expecting the offense to run we couldnt find the speed or ability to shed blocks to tackle the runner, but against better teams we will? Huh, who knew.
