IknoxvolsI
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 31, 2016
- Messages
- 1,171
- Likes
- 617
They have zero obligation to the fans, and no one said that they weren't going to class, only skipping bowl games or the end of the season.
Well it doesn't raise red flags for the people who actually matter.Sitting yourself in your final game(s) because you're worried about being injured doing the precise thing for which you've been given a scholarship/you're literally hoping to do professionally the following fall is not indicative of a team-player mindset, and refusing team workouts should raise a few red flags.
If McCaffery fails at the next level, teams should have pause about giving players who engage in the same behavior the benefit of the doubt.
Bill them for the tuition? Lol, as soon as they athlete can bill the University for the money they bring in and the jersey sales they have.Their scholarship paid for all their classes in return for their athletic prowess. So if they refuse to play then the school should bill them for tuition.
The purpose of colleges is academics. However sports scholarships are an exchange, not a hand out. If a player does not meet their end of the deal then the school shouldn't have to meet theirs. Obviously injuries Incurred during a game are an exception and the player should get the appropriate time to heal and not be punished.
I understand their decision and it may be the smart move, but it's a terrible precedent and what about the team mates they leave behind to fight alone? Is that player great without blocking or a QB throwing them the ball or a WR blocking for them.
All the "bowls don't matter crowd" are the same ones that were mad we didn't make the Sugar Bowl.
Fournette could've played but chose not to in order to avoid making the injury worse.
You may not respect it but NFL teams sure don't give a crap about your principles. Fournette and McCaffery were top 10 picks.
Bill them for the tuition? Lol, as soon as they athlete can bill the University for the money they bring in and the jersey sales they have.
If you agree to a deal then you should honor that deal. Period.
If a player wants that money, then they should only sign if that's in writing. Basically, hold out and negotiate.
And since players do NOT hold out and they DO agree to play football in return for an education, they should play to the best of their abilities as long as the school pays their tuition.
As far as part of the income, does that same player, take Barnett for example, did he not enrich himself using the facilities, staff, structures and platform of UT to gain a great job? He did not build those buildings, pay that staff, or build that fan base. Should we charge the players rent on the training facilities? Should we make the players pay to see a trainer? Basically, do players not exploit UT to display their talents as well?
I am not saying the kids made a bad decision for themselves which is who they should look out for. If I was talented enough I'd save myself too, luckily I never had to decide between what's right and 20 million dollars lol. However, it's a selfish act in a team game and that bothers my idealistic soul. So tifwiw
Watch these Star players all the sudden develop an "injury" to prevent them from playing instead of choosing not to play. Sounds better right? After all the Universities are making Big $$$ off of the Bowl Games and the players get nothing. Got to look out after you and your family first.
If a players sits out a bowl game or games at the end of a season, then he has quit. No more use of schools facilities, no "pro day" at the school, nothing, no more free (I use the term loosely) class. He starts paying his way. To put it simple as I can, he quit....
SIAP - McCaffery and Fournette skipped their bowl games to protect themselves from injury and risk their draft status and they went #4 and #8 respectively. Jake Butt tore his ACL in Michigan's bowl game and was projected to be a 1st round pick and slipped to the 5th round because of the injury.
My question is this - would you hold it against a star UT player for sitting out a bowl game to protect their draft status?
What if it's a significant bowl?
My opinion is that I don't have a problem with it unless its the playoff game and national title game. Guys have to protect their futures and there is so much $$ at stake and the differences between rounds is huge. What say you?
I wouldn't like it for the team, but I would completely understand and not blame him for it.
But what door does this open? After 3 losses, why not sit out the rest of the season?
If a players sits out a bowl game or games at the end of a season, then he has quit. No more use of schools facilities, no "pro day" at the school, nothing, no more free (I use the term loosely) class. He starts paying his way. To put it simple as I can, he quit....