Yes in a nutshellI get what Jake is saying. The situation in the administration caused by hiring Currie has made it harder for him to fire Butch after a 6-6/4-4 season. He has to get most of the boosters and people that don't like him on his side first to do that. Just not enough time in 9 months. At least that's what I understand.
I also get what you other guys are saying also,he needs/should be fired if there is no improvement in wins or win the East. I see that also.
I get what Jake is saying. The situation in the administration caused by hiring Currie has made it harder for him to fire Butch after a 6-6/4-4 season. He has to get most of the boosters and people that don't like him on his side first to do that. Just not enough time in 9 months. At least that's what I understand.
I also get what you other guys are saying also,he needs/should be fired if there is no improvement in wins or win the East. I see that also.
In my opinion,Jake may be on to something. Unless the bottom falls out,losing 7 or more games or finishing 6th or 7th place in the division,the AD mayhave trouble replacing him.
yes, i do. and the record, at this point in time, has very little to do with it, barring some ridiculous 3 or 4 win season where the wheels completely fall off or theres' some ridiculous scandal that comes out that rocks the football program making it impossible for them not to fire him.
option 1, until there's an option 2, is to keep Butch Jones. there's zero chance Currie is going to step in to his office in april on day 1 with the notion that Butch Jones is going to have an ultimatum to deal with for the 2017 season.
and that reality has zero to do with what i think about CBJ and what should have already happened. it has everything to do with the administrative situation this program has been in the past year, and will be in for at least the next year.
you're still operating off some notion that there's this mythical standard of competition that's dictating these decisions. and there very well maybe...in the future. but right now....un uh. Currie would have to take office day 1 almost with the intent of firing CBJ. and that's not happening either.
Losing changes attitudes faster than winning does. At this point in the spring before Fulmer was fired... he seemed safe and on his way to restoring the program.
IMHO, the impact of the AD on the major dept decisions is probably overestimated a little.... and particularly when it comes to hiring/firing a football coach. They may do the leg work and make a recommendation but Big Money makes the final call. It is like that at most top schools. If Jones goes or stays, I don't think it will be because of the AD. It will be because the big money boosters get in the ears of UT's leaders including the AD and above.
Miss State went to a bowl at 5-7. So technically you don't have to break even. I hate to give fuel to this thread with such a bad name but I think we are down to the last 1-2 seasons in Jones's tenure barring a miracle. I agree with Jake's post in principle although I think it's clear that we could easily go into Fall 2018 with Holly, Butch, and Barnes all on in a legitimate do or die hot seat situation. Do the major boosters and the AD really want to put themselves in that position? Probably not. Barnes probably has the best chance for a major turnaround and firing Holly will generate the most blowback. The way I read the stars, Butch better win the East this year.
I personally don't understand why we had to start a thread on this. All anyone has to do is open any of the other football threads and there are plenty of people on there that will tell you what's wrong with the program no matter if that's how it started or not. Continually dissing the program is all some do. JMO
So basically, you think the AD will wait until Butch has literally sunk the football program into a mire of mediocrity, to the point of breaking a historical losing record before he will be judged unfit to continue to be the HC? You don't think that Currie, with his years of AD experience is smart enough to look at the situation, the existing trends displayed, and preemptively make a coaching change prior to the entire football program imploding?
This is not the Dooley situation. Firing CBJ, after five seasons, and him having an 18-22 or 17-23 SEC record over those five seasons, is normal. Better coaches, have been fired while having better records. Keeping Butch Jones on staff for another year, and allowing recruiting to take a massive hit, is just going to make it harder to get the coach you want after another disappointing season in 2018.
That's pure speculation. You nor I have any clue as to how much leeway Currie has at the moment, but most people in college athletics don't get paid a million dollars a year to be grinning fools and avoid making hard decisions. CBJ's record speaks for itself. Given what we've seen in 4 seasons, we'll more than likely never even really challenge for the SECe much less the SEC itself as long as he is the head coach.
You mean the "mythical standard" of being a contender in the conference ? Something that UT was for over a hundred years, prior to the hiring of Derek Dooley and Butch Jones? Yeah I do operate on the standard that the expectation at the University of Tennessee is that the football program will be competitive as an SEC contender, and not a middling team that's content to play in a Music City/Liberty/Belk bowl every year.
Good point.Losing changes attitudes faster than winning does. At this point in the spring before Fulmer was fired... he seemed safe and on his way to restoring the program.
IMHO, the impact of the AD on the major dept decisions is probably overestimated a little.... and particularly when it comes to hiring/firing a football coach. They may do the leg work and make a recommendation but Big Money makes the final call. It is like that at most top schools. If Jones goes or stays, I don't think it will be because of the AD. It will be because the big money boosters get in the ears of UT's leaders including the AD and above.
Not sure why you brought AL up when our crazy adopted gator was talking about two other teams. Guess it was my Tatum reference? Anyways, It's not just him, so many guys were playing different positions towards the end just to fill in holes.
But since AL was brought up, 123 other teams aren't staying close to those guys either.
You have beautiful dreams.
Should Tennessee fire Jones? Not a chance. UTs athletic department would owe him and his staff more than $10 million. Tennessee only recently improved its financial standing. This isnt the time to go back in the hole.
It's amazing how some people who hope Tennessee fails (Negavols) get so blind to things like this. It's like talking to a bunch of country bumpkins.Call it what you want, but your unrealistic. Heres a quote from an article after the Vandy game.
That buyout amount mentioned is almost 10.7 million before the new 8 coaching hires. Is it higher with the new coaches/contracts?
Back to the 8 new coaches. No way they give the new coaches only 9 months and then clean house. You do that and Tennessee would be hard pressed to bring in a high school coach that would want to work here.
The upcoming recruiting class has the pieces for Butch to have his best recruiting class ever at UT with 14 4* kids in-state alone.
Not going anywhere but keep on typing.
It's amazing how some people who hope Tennessee fails (Negavols) get so blind to things like this. It's like talking to a bunch of country bumpkins.
What's amazing is the buyouts universities agree to.
I get "the market" for proven championship P5 coaches but the deals made for 8 win seasons including the cupcakes, astounds me.
That's not a shot against Jones, I'm talking all universities and coaches.
I know it won't happen but I would love to see performance based deals for that magnitude of money, make a return. You know, like the rest of us have to do... produce impressive results and poor results worthy of being fired, aren't rewarded.