Albert Haynesworth rants on AD hire

#52
#52
Here it is. Some people are P O'd cuz Hammy fired CPF . Currie was Hammy's right hand man at the time.
 
#53
#53
Jimmy Hyams has an article on Gridiron Now, the inside story about the AD hire. You'll find on the VN Homepage, just scroll down. Interesting .
 
#54
#54
agree with AH 100%, except my pick was Blackburn with Fulmer as his right hand man.
 
#56
#56
Every single K-state fan is beyond happy to be rid of him. That does not look like a good hire to me

If you go to the KSU boards the majority hate to lose him. Ask yourself this question "If Kstate hated him so bad why did they offer him an extension and a considerable raise after UT pursued him?"
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#57
#57
And here comes the hate and vitriol for former Vol Albert Haynesworth. Ought to be good.....


Naw. I was watching the moment he stomped on the face of a defenseless Andre Gurode. He isn't worth the time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#58
#58
I hope this tension doesn't carry over long term. A house divided cannot stand. I'm disappointed we even have to worry about something like this. I'm still going to reserve judgment and see what happens, but I must admit I'm not pleased at the idea of bringing in unnecessary tension. Hopefully it will work itself out.
 
#60
#60
"1. John Currie has a terrible track record in his administrative experience with the Vols.

2. John Currie has a mediocre track record as athletic director of the Kansas State Wildcats.

3. There were better options than John Currie available for the Vols.

4. John Currie generates very little energy as Tennessee’s new athletic director."

Caleb Calhoun article.

That is the only part I needed to see.
 
#61
#61
No one isn't going to be happy. I don't give a flying crap who was hired. If it was Fulmer, everyone would have been complaining about him having ZERO AD experience. If Blackburn was hired, you'd have some folks complaining that's he's an up comer and doesn't have experience at a powerhouse school. We hired Currie from K-State who has UT ties, has worked here before, and has had successs at a powerhouse school, yet we got people complaining about that. Not everyone was going to be satisfied anyway so how does Haynesworth's perspective on the hire change anything?

Personally it's just constant bickering coming from both sides cause Blackburn wasn't hired. That's all it is. I'm very pleased with the hire and wish Currie a lot of luck. At least give the guy a damn chance before you start assuming he's a bad hire.

I like ya josh and your posts but please don't call Kansas St. a powerhouse.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#62
#62
They very well may be "selfish entitle a$$holes", but the AD hire has nothing to do with that, imo.

In fact, (at least initially) it looks to be a good hire

no it's not.

have not read or listened to the media in knoxville or at K. State. this guy sounds like he'll be the AD version of Dooley.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#63
#63
I hope this tension doesn't carry over long term. A house divided cannot stand. I'm disappointed we even have to worry about something like this. I'm still going to reserve judgment and see what happens, but I must admit I'm not pleased at the idea of bringing in unnecessary tension. Hopefully it will work itself out.

if we go 7-5 or 6-6 next year, you're going to see a house unified against Butch and this administration.
 
#64
#64
With all due respect to Coach Fulmer, but the last time I checked, colleges don't hire a fired head coach to be AD.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#65
#65
If you go to the KSU boards the majority hate to lose him. Ask yourself this question "If Kstate hated him so bad why did they offer him an extension and a considerable raise after UT pursued him?"

there is a big difference in "they" and coaches and fans.

i think you'd agree the majority of the fans wanted Blackburn but "they" wanted this guy. so i wouldn't put too much weight in the contact ext and raise. you be a great money raiser and have bad relationships with coaches and fans
 
#66
#66
Fulmer had absolutely no experience at being an AD. He was up against at least 2, maybe more candidates that had that experience.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#68
#68
I hope this tension doesn't carry over long term. A house divided cannot stand. I'm disappointed we even have to worry about something like this. I'm still going to reserve judgment and see what happens, but I must admit I'm not pleased at the idea of bringing in unnecessary tension. Hopefully it will work itself out.

There was already tension between Fulmer and Blackburn. Both played the media and this is what the result is.

They may have thought they were helping when in fact they have created the divide.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#69
#69
What if the new AD brought Fulmer in in some capacity (as many said that Blackburn would if hired)?

As far as I know, nobody has said that that is out of the question (though it may well be)


Google Phil Fulmer Shoney's. Check out what pops up. My only question of Currie, since he was here at the time, is why this was covered up. If stupidity came in colors, Phil used every shade crayola makes. Bring him back? I don't get it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#70
#70
I like Fulmer a bunch and am grateful that he was our HC and brought us a NC. However, how often has someone been fired from a company, came back and was successful?
 
#71
#71
Oh no! We're going to find out who hates Charles Davis! :w00t:

Charles Davis is always positive. He is fair in what he says - but always finds the positive within any negativity that happens - at least that is what I have noticed.

As such, I think he is good for UT as a balance to these "sky is always falling" folks.
 
#72
#72
Google Phil Fulmer Shoney's. Check out what pops up. My only question of Currie, since he was here at the time, is why this was covered up. If stupidity came in colors, Phil used every shade crayola makes. Bring him back? I don't get it.

Oh my :(
 
#73
#73
I've been called worse.

His reason was the guy attempted to block him in a way to injure his leg to get him out of the game and possibly end his career and take away his and his family's lively hood. We he got up to tell the to watch out the guy was laughing about it, then he kick him in the face.

No room for that crap EVER?

That may be true, but it works both ways.

Who's the worse lowlife scumbag the one that purposely tries to end a players career with a deliberate dirty hit and then laughs about it to their face or the guy that retaliates?

It's all crap for sure and maybe he should have left it alone and maybe his whole story is a lie, until proven otherwise, I back his play.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#74
#74
I've been called worse.

His reason was the guy attempted to block him in a way to injure his leg to get him out of the game and possibly end his career and take away his and his family's lively hood. We he got up to tell the to watch out the guy was laughing about it, then he kick him in the face.

No room for that crap EVER?

That may be true, but it works both ways.

Who's the worse lowlife scumbag the one that purposely tries to end a players career with a deliberate dirty hit and then laughs about it to their face or the guy that retaliates?

It's all crap for sure and maybe he should have left it alone and maybe his whole story is a lie, until proven otherwise, I back his play.

Every criminal has a great excuse why they did what they did. No room for stomping a guy in the face on the field ever........no matter if hes laughing at you or not.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#75
#75
Just from the info already put out there I think Fulmer and friends are not as angry about not being named AD as they are that Currie was. There's clearly unresolved bad blood, which is a huge bummer. Friends and former players who are loyal to Fulmer are naturally going to go to bat for him. I just hope everyone can kiss and make up so we can focus on advancing UT athletics baggage free.
 
Advertisement



Back
Top