Official Bubble Watch Thread

Yea 19-11.

In that case I think Bama would go if they beat us.
It would all come down to that one game imo.

When Alabama beats South Carolina or Kentucky next week let me know, until then they're less likely of a threat than Georgia or even Vanderbilt...not sure what's up with you Alabama fixation lately other than Braxton Key.
 
Vanderbilt is more of a threat.
If we both finish with 17 wins, they would have a better rpi. don't think 17 would get either team in though.
2 in SECT might land them on the bubble.
I don't see 6 teams getting in from SEC.

This...Vandy has a much better chance than Alabama of getting in, same for Georgia.
 
Wonder If having Rick as out coach helps us any? Would think the NCAA would want a hof'er like Rick in the tourney
 
This...Vandy has a much better chance than Alabama of getting in, same for Georgia.

Vandy has very little chance of getting to the +/- mark they need with record. That's the part that some of the experts seems to be focusing on that worries me and what we have been discussing.
 
Last edited:
Vandy has very little chance of getting to the +/- mark they need with record. That's the part that some of the experts seems to be focusing on that worries me and what we have been discussing.

Both teams need to go 6-3 to have a chance, and 7-2 to feel safe...not sure your point?
 
Yet you fail to mention if Vandy goes 6-3 and beats us they're more likely to do the same...why is what I'm asking?

No. Vandy would only be 17-14 which doesn't for the +\- criteria being discussed here. Also that would be a spilt with the Vols.

Sounds like their is a significant difference in 17-14(Vandy) and 17-13(TN with Chaminade) with the committee.
 
A 19 win Bama would have a rpi of 62.
Rpiforecast Wizard.

Would be interesting to see if the +\- record and head to head win would be good enough to overtake a tenn team around 50. how the sec tourney effected RPIs would be big imo.
 
No. Vandy would only be 17-14 which doesn't for the +\- criteria being discussed here. Also that would be a spilt with the Vols.

Sounds like their is a significant difference in 17-14(Vandy) and 17-13(TN with Chaminade) with the committee.

Right, but with Bama's RPI/SOS you're essentially saying the committee would take a team they've never taken before, same could apply to Vandy. As I said, for either of them to likely get in they would need to go 7-2 IMO.
 
Would be interesting to see if the +\- record and head to head win would be good enough to overtake a tenn team around 50. how the sec tourney effected RPIs would be big imo.

I thought the field was set and SECT games didn't matter you said?
 
I thought the field was set and SECT games didn't matter you said?

I knew you were going to come back with that lol.

I think what happens with the RPI is more important than what happens with a loss/win for the conference tourneys. Beating Missouri would be worse than losing to South Carolina would be an example.
 
To further my last post. We don't want to play Missouri in the SEC tourney.
Florida fell from 9 to 14 last night in RPI by beating the breaks off of them. We need to hope they don't win their play in game.
 
And why aren't you mentioning Georgia? If they go 5-4 they have the +/- record and the RPI to go with it, seems much more plausible the Bama?
 
And why aren't you mentioning Georgia? If they go 5-4 they have the +/- record and the RPI to go with it, seems much more plausible the Bama?

I am dang glad they didn't pull that one out Wednesday. They are in it as well. Auburn has a slight shot to.
 
I knew you were going to come back with that lol.

I think what happens with the RPI is more important than what happens with a loss/win for the conference tourneys. Beating Missouri would be worse than losing to South Carolina would be an example.

At that point in the year 1 game has a minimal effect on the RPI, getting the 4 seed would be nice but I'm not sure Tennessee has much of a chance at that.
 
Advertisement



Back
Top