golfballs
Mostly Peaceful Poster
- Joined
- Oct 28, 2009
- Messages
- 75,317
- Likes
- 57,534
Tragic
Those issues will get cleared up
Soon there won't be much to clear up. A second Federal judge has found the Executive Order unconstitutional. Issues order banning removal of green card holders being detained at Dulles. Also requires access to lawyers. Also it seems that Trump signed illegal immigration / refugee Executive Order without consulting DOJ lawyers on it conditionality or coordination with DHS, State, DoD.
No luck there... "Judge Donnelly?" That doesn't sound Mexican at all.
There's nothing unconstitutional about controlling who gets into our country. That's is completely absurd
French Car-Burning Rite Spreads | TIME.com
France has a long tradition of burning cars on New Years Eve. The total number of cars burned has actually gone down.
One more of the hundreds of examples of alt-right fake news that is accepted by the right wing.
Spend 10 minutes and research "new years car burning in France".
I'm beginning to think that 90% of what the right believes is fake. If what you believed to be true was ACTUALLY true, I could almost understand your positions.
Do yourselves a favor and check the validity of at least of few of the things you accept as fact. When you realize how much misinformation you are being spoon fed, you will be amazed.
The unconstitutional part is the fact that the president does not have the constitutional power to decide who is allowed to get into the country. That is a power vested only to congress. The President's job is to enforce said law or legislation. There is also this thing called due process.
There's nothing unconstitutional about controlling who gets into our country. That's is completely absurd
That's not true
Argument preview: The doctrine of consular non-reviewability ? historical relic or good law? - SCOTUSblog
Also, constitutional rights don't exist for people who aren't in this country. Good lord
No, it's not absurd. Trump has used language in this order which can be used to ban legal US residents who are green card holders that have temporarily traveled abroad from reentering the country. The federal courts are not done with this issue by a long shot.
Well 3 Federal Judges so far say you are wrong. And it doesn't help Trump that he had people who are not lawyers and have no constitutional law experience write his executive orders. It also doesn't help Trump that the lawyers he sent to argue its constitutionality cited the wrong provisions and statues. Just take these 3 L's
No, it's not absurd. Trump has used language in this order which can be used to ban legal US residents who are green card holders that have temporarily traveled abroad from reentering the country. The federal courts are not done with this issue by a long shot.
