Immigration Ban

Obamacare website?

I bet Trumps administration could get that right.

LOL!

Yet another deflection. The DHS concluded that Trump's executive order couldn't possibly include green card holders (a logical assumption of a vaguely written order) but they were overruled by Steve Bannon.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Tragic

Those issues will get cleared up

Soon there won't be much to clear up. A second Federal judge has found the Executive Order unconstitutional. Issues order banning removal of green card holders being detained at Dulles. Also requires access to lawyers. Also it seems that Trump signed illegal immigration / refugee Executive Order without consulting DOJ lawyers on it conditionality or coordination with DHS, State, DoD.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Soon there won't be much to clear up. A second Federal judge has found the Executive Order unconstitutional. Issues order banning removal of green card holders being detained at Dulles. Also requires access to lawyers. Also it seems that Trump signed illegal immigration / refugee Executive Order without consulting DOJ lawyers on it conditionality or coordination with DHS, State, DoD.

There's nothing unconstitutional about controlling who gets into our country. That's is completely absurd
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
5abae9_acf7dcf1fbcd1a7504b90203f20ea49e.jpg_512.jpeg

French Car-Burning Rite Spreads | TIME.com

France has a long tradition of burning cars on New Years Eve. The total number of cars burned has actually gone down.

One more of the hundreds of examples of alt-right fake news that is accepted by the right wing.

Spend 10 minutes and research "new years car burning in France".

I'm beginning to think that 90% of what the right believes is fake. If what you believed to be true was ACTUALLY true, I could almost understand your positions.

Do yourselves a favor and check the validity of at least of few of the things you accept as fact. When you realize how much misinformation you are being spoon fed, you will be amazed.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 5 people
No luck there... "Judge Donnelly?" That doesn't sound Mexican at all.

Judge Ann Donnelly was born in Michigan and is an Obama appointee. The second Federal Judge that has ruled against Trump is Judge Leonie Brinkema. On October 28, 2003, she sentenced al-Qaeda operative Iyman Faris to twenty years imprisonment for providing material support. She also sentenced 9/11 conspirator Zacarias Moussaoui to life in a supermax prison. She told him: “You came here to be a martyr and to die in a great big bang of glory, but to paraphrase the poet T. S. Eliot, instead, you will die with a whimper. The rest of your life you will spend in prison." She was appointed by President Bill Clinton.
 
There's nothing unconstitutional about controlling who gets into our country. That's is completely absurd

The unconstitutional part is the fact that the president does not have the constitutional power to decide who is allowed to get into the country. That is a power vested only to congress. The President's job is to enforce said law or legislation. There is also this thing called due process.
 

Attachments

  • C3TeWrPVUAAa5sZ.jpg
    C3TeWrPVUAAa5sZ.jpg
    71.3 KB · Views: 0
  • C3TojvsWMAA1s6Y.jpg
    C3TojvsWMAA1s6Y.jpg
    34.6 KB · Views: 1
French Car-Burning Rite Spreads | TIME.com

France has a long tradition of burning cars on New Years Eve. The total number of cars burned has actually gone down.

One more of the hundreds of examples of alt-right fake news that is accepted by the right wing.

Spend 10 minutes and research "new years car burning in France".

I'm beginning to think that 90% of what the right believes is fake. If what you believed to be true was ACTUALLY true, I could almost understand your positions.

Do yourselves a favor and check the validity of at least of few of the things you accept as fact. When you realize how much misinformation you are being spoon fed, you will be amazed.

Right. Fake news
 
The unconstitutional part is the fact that the president does not have the constitutional power to decide who is allowed to get into the country. That is a power vested only to congress. The President's job is to enforce said law or legislation. There is also this thing called due process.

That's not true

http://www.scotusblog.com/2015/02/argument-preview-the-doctrine-of-consular-non-reviewability-historical-relic-or-good-law/

Also, constitutional rights don't exist for people who aren't in this country. Good lord
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
There's nothing unconstitutional about controlling who gets into our country. That's is completely absurd

No, it's not absurd. Trump has used language in this order which can be used to ban legal US residents who are green card holders that have temporarily traveled abroad from reentering the country. The federal courts are not done with this issue by a long shot.
 
That's not true

Argument preview: The doctrine of consular non-reviewability ? historical relic or good law? - SCOTUSblog

Also, constitutional rights don't exist for people who aren't in this country. Good lord

Well 3 Federal Judges so far say you are wrong. And it doesn't help Trump that he had people who are not lawyers and have no constitutional law experience write his executive orders. It also doesn't help Trump that the lawyers he sent to argue its constitutionality cited the wrong provisions and statues. Just take these 3 L's
 

Attachments

  • Cw0bjiRW8AA2nhJ.jpg
    Cw0bjiRW8AA2nhJ.jpg
    35.7 KB · Views: 0
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
No, it's not absurd. Trump has used language in this order which can be used to ban legal US residents who are green card holders that have temporarily traveled abroad from reentering the country. The federal courts are not done with this issue by a long shot.

The constitution doesn't apply to non citizens who aren't on American soil. Where did you go to school?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
Well 3 Federal Judges so far say you are wrong. And it doesn't help Trump that he had people who are not lawyers and have no constitutional law experience write his executive orders. It also doesn't help Trump that the lawyers he sent to argue its constitutionality cited the wrong provisions and statues. Just take these 3 L's

Obama judges who would be overturned
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
No, it's not absurd. Trump has used language in this order which can be used to ban legal US residents who are green card holders that have temporarily traveled abroad from reentering the country. The federal courts are not done with this issue by a long shot.

Here is the funny thing. Bannon and Miller INTERVENED to apply the order to green card holders. Overruling DOJ last minute legal guidance.
 
If you think the United States constitution applies to non-US citizens in foreign countries then you are mentally retarded
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
Obama judges who would be overturned

A year or two from now, when we're hunkered down in our bunkers in the war with Iran and China, you'll still be posting about Obama with the five minutes of Internet we're capable of a day.
 
I am a proud graduate of the Univ of Tennessee... Thanks for asking! It seems our federal judges see it differently, don't they.

The judges said that the people who landed on those planes can't be sent back. Nothing about Trump issuing guidance on who can't be admitted to our country.
 
Advertisement





Back
Top