JFreak
Buck Fama
- Joined
- Jul 22, 2009
- Messages
- 3,459
- Likes
- 3,080
They would absolutely be competitive, but to imply that they'd somehow win it every year because Mason and McElwain are his opposing coaches is flawed.No i didnt, the original argument was that CBJ would win 10 games every year in the ACC, which there is nothing to indicate that is so. But i think Clemson would do very well in the SEC, the beat and were competitive with what is by far the best team in the SEC. But to be fair, they did get a scare from South Carolina at 56-7.
How is that. The post im replying to is indicating that CDS wouldnt be able to be a successful coach in the SEC because Saban coaches in the league, which is simply wrong. As to your post, everyone has close games, good coaches figure out how to win them on a consistent basis.
He's only beat him once out of how many times? So you're saying if he was a coach in the SEC his wins would have gone up and not his losses?
Pour ya another.
All coaches are judged accordingly. Every program has goals and standards they expect to meet, two different schools two different expectations. What do you think the expectations are for a coach like PJ at W Mich cause I promise you undefeated seasons aren't the standard set there. A program like Tennessee with the money that we have in facilities and the tradition more is expected. For instance Sabans talent pool at Alabama wasn't stocked before Saban, yeah its Alabama so talent was there. A coach like Saban went 7-6 first year at Alabama, second year 12 wins. That is coaching flat out coaching, hasn't been under 10 wins since. Great coaches can strategize and win that is the difference between great coaches and mediocre coaches. Just for the record I'm not comparing butch to saban, lets be real there is not much comparison there. Again not bashing Butch but just basing it on the stats.
The SEC east is worse than the ACC.
yeah...totally....you're so spot on....Kentucky....yes, KENTUCKY...stymied, the Hiesman trophy winner, best player in the ACC and CFB.....as did LSU and their new coach!
At least Herman didn't blow that one...like he did against USM, Navy, Memphis and SDSU...oh, that's right, he quit before he could lose 4 this year.
It's an overall weak conference...UL played a weak schedule until the final 3 weeks and it showed.
SEC may not be much better this year....but
SMFH and LMFAO
Some of you are blinded by the disdane for Jones...I aint totally sure about the guy, but at least I can be honest when compariing him to various other "hot guys".
A graph of the first 4 years for each. Y-axis is winning percentage, x-axis shows years in program (starting 4 years before arrival).
Years prior to arrival add context. Cover them up with paper if you want.First off, not sure what the years prior to their arrival have to do with anything. If they weren't there as head coach you can't hold either of them accountable. What Dooley did is what Dooley did. What Tommy Bowden did is what Tommy Bowden did. Second, your year 4 of Dabo is way off. He won 11 of 13 games giving him a winning % of 85% for that year. But you're probably counting his stint as interim HC as year 1, which I wouldn't consider year one, but whatever. I guess the silly comparisons will continue.
yeah...totally....you're so spot on....Kentucky....yes, KENTUCKY...stymied, the Hiesman trophy winner, best player in the ACC and CFB.....as did LSU and their new coach!
At least Herman didn't blow that one...like he did against USM, Navy, Memphis and SDSU...oh, that's right, he quit before he could lose 4 this year.
It's an overall weak conference...UL played a weak schedule until the final 3 weeks and it showed.
SEC may not be much better this year....but
SMFH and LMFAO
Some of you are blinded by the disdane for Jones...I aint totally sure about the guy, but at least I can be honest when compariing him to various other "hot guys".
Wait and see? He's had two seasons with the most talented and experienced team in a decade. What are you still looking for?