AV_12
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2012
- Messages
- 50,427
- Likes
- 18,206
They were 6-13 on third downs.
I'm not saying Kirkland was bad. But didn't we all expect a bigger step forward from him than we saw early in 2016?
That's my point.
More than solid is an overstatement, IMO. They were far too inconsistent and gave up easy scoring drives to opponents early in almost every game.No revisionist history here pal. Appalachian State scored 13 points. That's 13 with 0 points coming in the second half. Their game plan made up of edge rushes and quick passes did sort of negate our pass rush, so kudos to them. It still doesn't take away from a solid performance on the part of our defense.
And in regards to Battle at Bristol, If you take away their 79 yard score in garbage time, Va Tech got 87 yards in the second half.
The bottom line is that the D was more than solid through the first half of the season.
I'm not saying he played badly, but in the small amount we saw of him healthy in 2016, he didn't seem to have taken a step forward at all from 2015.Everyone expected a bigger step forward from the whole team than what we saw in 2016, but apparently staff decided to go soft in fall camp and let inmates run the asylum in the gym during the offseason. I just don't see how you can single out Kirkland's performance before his injury.
I agree. It's premature to be picking sides and getting emotional over QB's for next season. I am happy we have both. May the best man win the job, so our Vols can win.
More than solid is an overstatement, IMO. They were far too inconsistent and gave up easy scoring drives to opponents early in almost every game.
And FTR, they had 108 yards without their garbage time TD drive in the second half. But then they fumbled a ball like 20 yards back to the 4 and Tuttle hopped on it, so that came off the final tally.
At one point in the second half, they were driving down two scores, but then fumbled on their next two plays and the offense capitalized to make it a 28 point spread.
We'll just have to agree to disagree. The D played well enough to win until a ludicrous amount of injuries began to mount up halfway through the Florida, UGA, A&M, Bama gauntlet. Seems like consecutive three and outs by our offense sometimes put the D in a bit of a bind and made them look a little worse than they actually were particularly vs. App State and 1st half vs. Va Tech. South Carolina loss was on the O as much as the Vandy loss was on the D.
And BTW, lost yardage is still a win for the D.
Agreed. I know I am going to get killed with this, but JG was eh in his all star games. I have no problem with Dormady getting the call. If BB's analysis and evaluation of CBs are any indication, Dormady NEEDS to start. �� (J/K BB)
We didn't have a "really good" defense at any point in the season outside of the 2nd half against UF, really.
Even at their best, they were frustratingly inconsistents.
Heard Joey Kent on the radio the other day discussing this. He didn't seem to favor either one, seemed very impressed by both. He actually kept stating that Dormady's athleticism keeps getting downplayed, but that he can move around much better than people give him credit for. My personal opinion is still Guarantano will take the job, but it will definitely be a battle. Great problem to have.
It's 100 percent correct. Perception changes everything and with fans watching their own teams that perception changes to be far more critical and often inaccurate when comparing one's own team to another. The biggest problem CBJ has right now (well one of the biggest, anyway) is that the Knoxville Area Media and UT fans more broadly have influenced national perceptions of him in a negative way.
That's resulted in very negative feedback from national talking heads like Cowherd and others but really the national guys are simply following the perception that our own media and fans create. We, "The Legions of the Miserable", as Johnny so aptly put it, have a stronger influence on how the local and national media portrays our program and coach than anyone wants to admit. This is especially true with a sports media that is as immature and over-saturated as Knoxville's.
We have a ridiculous amount of sports journalists comparative to our overall size and population and as such media that covers UT football tends to either feed us what we want (everything from positive stories to generating excitement for a recruit we might not actually have any chance with) or pander to the most absurd and embarrassing aspects of fanhood (see: football forum) to generate interest among fans and secure their livelihoods.
When looking at the big picture or national media, it's a perception game and unfortunately our local media tends to use the most ridiculous fan perceptions they can find. The national media then blows that up and reality starts to shimmer. Unfortunately once that happens there's not much rational minded folks can do about it.
