Would Clemson deserve it at 11-2 without being a conference champ? Virginia Tech would be 10-3 as a conference champ. Even without a mandatory conference champ rule, these games matter, and it gets much more interesting.
At least UT is excelling at something. They are continuing to excel at lowering the expectations of anybody that truly gives a crap about them. My money has found much more productive uses, but they could care less about that as well.
Lead story in ESPN.com about what has been learned during the NFL season so far. Applicable crossover to college would be (summarizing): First, build the best teams by first emphasizing the lines, especially O-lines. Used Raiders, Cowboys, Titans, Lions, etc. as examples of doing it right. Next, QB's matter and don't be afraid to bench one as needed. Next, patience is a virtue sometimes with coaches and AD's (GM's in NFL - they used McKenzie as an example). They also used Gus Bradley with the Jags as a counterpoint when patience was not a virtue. Final point, variances matter. Major stats changes period to period can make or break a season. But also head coach decisions on 4th downs, aggressive versus traditional in game strategy, etc. can cause variances of performance in the stat that matters most - wins and losses.
I agree. Insert your own interpretation of how that applies to our Vols.
The winners shouldn't get auto bids IMO. Some team winning the lesser division at 8-4/9-3 and then pulling off an upset shouldn't get a berth just because.
AgreeThen why even have conference championship games or even conferences for that matter?
If a team wins their conference, IMO, they should have an automatic bid (P5 conference) if their conference is weak and they won, well that will get sorted out in the playoffs. Maybe the conferences should select better teams for their conferences then. It follows the same logic as the NFL. Should the winners of the NFC south be left out because their division sucks?
Then why even have conference championship games or even conferences for that matter?
If a team wins their conference, IMO, they should have an automatic bid (P5 conference) if their conference is weak and they won, well that will get sorted out in the playoffs. Maybe the conferences should select better teams for their conferences then. It follows the same logic as the NFL. Should the winners of the NFC south be left out because their division sucks?
NFL and CFB are different animals.Then why even have conference championship games or even conferences for that matter?
If a team wins their conference, IMO, they should have an automatic bid (P5 conference) if their conference is weak and they won, well that will get sorted out in the playoffs. Maybe the conferences should select better teams for their conferences then. It follows the same logic as the NFL. Should the winners of the NFC south be left out because their division sucks?
