Rgntddybrvol91
VFL in FLA
- Joined
- Sep 8, 2012
- Messages
- 785
- Likes
- 754
I should have worded better because I actually agree that this year is a decline from last year. If 2017 is the same or worse, then that is when I would begin to use the word "trend". I just need more than 1 year of decline or stagnation to call it a trend
So we land the #1 recruit in the Nation and then this comes out...
I've read the Haney article twice now, and there are several things that come to mind. Most of the things from the article have been discussed here on VN. Not a lot of surprises there. Compiling them into an indictment of CBJ is a bit much at this point. The article was a clear hatchet job on CBJ, feeding those still reeling from the Vandy loss. Haney wrote the article in such a way to feed our frustrations. Not sure why he felt the need to do that, nor what agenda he has. This raises my suspicions about 247. Also I was intrigued by the timing of the article. Coming just a day after the Smith commitment certainly raises red flags. Almost everyone rates Smith as the #1 prospect in the 2017 class except 247 who has him at #4. Also they have him as the #3 OT. Did Haney think he could influence Smith to change his mind and go elsewhere??? Or did he just want to taint Smith's decision as bad.
There's just too much surrounding this article that doesn't pass the test of objective journalism. Very suspicious.
I totally agree. The tone of the article almost sounds like someone has an axe to grind. My two guesses are a big booster that wanted CBJ gone and didn't get their way or Hurd/Hurd apologist. Hurd is admittedly more of a conspiracy theory but with the bashing of Kamara in the article it didn't seem like too far of a stretch.
"I'm not saying Haney likes to kill puppies, I'm just saying that he COULD be killing puppies daily and we can't verify that he doesn't."
You sir sound like a selfish, self centered little brat! "Look what they did to my season" boohoo you went into this season with high expectations because you saw what CBJ had done for the program the last 3 years. Or did you go into it saying "he'll blow it in the playoffs, he will" (Major League)
and the flip side to that coin...
Haney could be quoting an unnamed source that Butch Jones is basically unpopular with his players and we would have no way to verify that anyone actually said that... He very well could be making it up. Of course, he could also just be courting comments from players who say what he wants to hear but who will only go on the record anonymously. He clearly did not actively seek current players who would dispute that sentiment. Either way, his agenda was clear.
What is his agenda if he and his sources are correct?
This really misses the point... His agenda was a hit piece. He did not seek the opinions of players who had positive experiences at Tennessee such as Josh Dobbs, Cam Sutton, Alvin Kamara and Derek Barnett because he knew that they would likely give positive comments about Butch Jones and be willing to attach their names to those opinions. That's not what he wanted. He wanted to tell a one sided narrative. You should always be leery of an article which mostly just cites unnamed sources. It's probably telling an oversimplified and unfair story.
This really misses the point... His agenda was a hit piece. He did not seek the opinions of players who had positive experiences at Tennessee such as Josh Dobbs, Cam Sutton, Alvin Kamara and Derek Barnett because he knew that they would likely give positive comments about Butch Jones and be willing to attach their names to those opinions. That's not what he wanted. He wanted to tell a one sided narrative. You should always be leery of an article which mostly just cites unnamed sources. It's probably telling an oversimplified and unfair story.
Tell me, other than rumors on this board - what "sure winner" coach after Fulmer was fired said "pay me X and I'll be your coach"? There was not one.
Active players may not speak to the media without CBJ's permission. A creditable source here at VN stated the CBJ himself was asked to comment and seemingly chose not to.
What was the motivation of the writer to discredit Jones?
This really misses the point... His agenda was a hit piece. He did not seek the opinions of players who had positive experiences at Tennessee such as Josh Dobbs, Cam Sutton, Alvin Kamara and Derek Barnett because he knew that they would likely give positive comments about Butch Jones and be willing to attach their names to those opinions. That's not what he wanted. He wanted to tell a one sided narrative. You should always be leery of an article which mostly just cites unnamed sources. It's probably telling an oversimplified and unfair story.
Active players may not speak to the media without CBJ's permission. A creditable source here at VN stated the CBJ himself was asked to comment and seemingly chose not to.
What was the motivation of the writer to discredit Jones?
And Butch Jones would have given Dobbs permission to speak to him. He clearly and justifiably trusts him. We have never had a better role model for our program. Haney did not want to hear the opinion of Josh Dobbs. He wanted negativity.
It hurt a bunch of feelings. That doesn't mean it's false.
He could have found some positive comments Im sure. Does that mean that those giving ones you don't like are wrong.
I am curious, do you believe he went with this content and title without it being run by the Ath Dept?
And if so. Was UTs defense in the office that day?
I don't think anyone here would really know unless there's a sleeper who was actually part of the search and hire effort. I certainly don't know, but I've read post after post that UT was too cheap, that UT wouldn't allow coach X to bring his staff, that coach Y turned UT down saying he was satisfied where he was and went elsewhere the next year, the Bigfoot sightings around Knoxville meant an imminent celebrity hire, and can't forget the infamous tail number trackers.
The particular statement you are quoting was really sarcasm, so I think I missed making my point; you and I are really very much in agreement when the words don't get in the way.
Nor should he.
It is unfair to expect someone to comment on attacks made against them by people who are unwilling to attach their names to their comments.