PizzaGate

#276
#276
This video is 2 hours long, but after watching 15 minutes I can say that Ted Gunderson isn't crazy.

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xMQifcCb2M8[/youtube]
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#277
#277
LG, I'd like to hear your thoughts on this article. We are in a child porn epidemic where suppliers and purchasers are not just dumb rednecks in trailer parks. Do you still think it is absurd that there is possibly a child sex trafficking ring which could implicate several high profile politicians? Why is this such an impossibility in your eyes?

https://medium.com/@LoriHandrahan2/daniel-rosen-s-arrest-1f7befb1762c#.vtlj3c9fj
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#278
#278
SamRebel35 said:
LG, I'd like to hear your thoughts on this article. We are in a child porn epidemic where suppliers and purchasers are not just dumb rednecks in trailer parks. Do you still think it is absurd that there is possibly a child sex trafficking ring which could implicate several high profile politicians? Why is this such an impossibility in your eyes?

https://medium.com/@LoriHandrahan2/daniel-rosen-s-arrest-1f7befb1762c#.vtlj3c9fj
Click to expand...

Wow. That sickens me terribly. Nothing worse than a child molester. Nothing. I will be judge jury and executioner if somerhing happened to my wife or kids like that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#279
#279
I wish the Trump Child Sex Abuse Investigation Unit could channel just a fraction of its apparent moral indignation towards finding out the truth about its founder - you know, that guy who won the American presidential election last month while under a pedophilia civil case.

2016, the year moral relativism became a way of life for everyone, not just liberal academics.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#280
#280
volprof said:
I wish the Trump Child Sex Abuse Investigation Unit could channel just a fraction of its apparent moral indignation towards finding out the truth about its founder - you know, that guy who won the American presidential election last month while under a pedophilia civil case.

2016, the year moral relativism became a way of life for everyone, not just liberal academics.
Click to expand...

You're such a sad sack. Those of us that believe there is a pedo ring have stated that we understand the possibility he might be connected to it. We hope that he isn't, but nothing would be shocking at this point.
 
#281
#281
davethevol said:
You're such a sad sack. Those of us that believe there is a pedo ring have stated that we understand the possibility he might be connected to it. We hope that he isn't, but nothing would be shocking at this point.
Click to expand...

I would say a "sad sack" is someone who still voted for Trump, having suspicion of this, but still held it against Hillary nonetheless. I would also say a "sad sack" is a person who doesn't care regardless.

Not accusing you of either, but I think your vision is a bit skewed.
 
#282
#282
volprof said:
I wish the Trump Child Sex Abuse Investigation Unit could channel just a fraction of its apparent moral indignation towards finding out the truth about its founder - you know, that guy who won the American presidential election last month while under a pedophilia civil case.

2016, the year moral relativism became a way of life for everyone, not just liberal academics.
Click to expand...

So we shouldn't focus on a child sex trafficking ring involving countless high profile powerful people, but should instead focus intently on only one member who, if he is indeed a pedophile (you got a link for me on that one, BTW?), would likely be tied to this very pedophile ring? Your priorities of who should be investigated for pedophilia and who shouldn't is a great example of your new "moral relativism" shtick that you've been beating like a dead horse.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#283
#283
volprof said:
I would say a "sad sack" is someone who still voted for Trump, having suspicion of this, but still held it against Hillary nonetheless. I would also say a "sad sack" is a person who doesn't care regardless.

Not accusing you of either, but I think your vision is a bit skewed.
Click to expand...

Podesta is way more suspect in terms of pedophilia than is Trump.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#284
#284
SamRebel35 said:
So we shouldn't focus on a child sex trafficking ring involving countless high profile powerful people, but should instead focus intently on only one member who, if he is indeed a pedophile (you got a link for me on that one, BTW?), would likely be tied to this very pedophile ring? Your priorities of who should be investigated for pedophilia and who shouldn't is a great example of your new "moral relativism" shtick that you've been beating like a dead horse.
Click to expand...

Neither John Podesta nor his Satanist mistress she-devil woman were elected president.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#285
#285
volprof said:
Neither John Podesta nor his Satanist mistress she-devil woman were elected president.
Click to expand...

Let me rephrase. Trump isn't half as suspect as podesta and Hillary. Don't forget Hillary's connection to child smuggling in Haiti. You likely voted for a child sex trafficker. Congrats.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#286
#286
SamRebel35 said:
Let me rephrase. Trump isn't half as suspect as podesta and Hillary. Don't forget Hillary's connection to child smuggling in Haiti. You likely voted for a child sex trafficker. Congrats.
Click to expand...

Let me rephrase. Neither John Podesta, his Satanist she-devil woman, nor Hillary Clinton are going to be president of the United States of America.

And I voted for Hillary Clinton, knowing fully well what she is because I know fully well what Trump is. It was the lesser of two evils, and the only option I had. I'm sure you feel far different, and that's fine, but I vehemently disagree with you. Not voting at all was nothing but moral cowardice; it was an option I couldn't benefit myself of.
 
#287
#287
volprof said:
Let me rephrase. Neither John Podesta, his Satanist she-devil woman, nor Hillary Clinton are going to be president of the United States of America.

And I voted for Hillary Clinton, knowing fully well what she is because I know fully well what Trump is. It was the lesser of two evils, and the only option I had. I'm sure you feel far different, and that's fine, but I vehemently disagree with you. Not voting at all was nothing but moral cowardice; it was an option I couldn't benefit myself of.
Click to expand...

You voted for Hillary,a sex trafficker. I didn't vote for Hillary or Trump. I win the moral clarity Olympics! You have to now defend your decision to vote for a sex trafficker. Try not to bring up Trump. You had the option to vote for neither, but you chose child sex trafficker. Way to go!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6 people
#288
#288
volprof said:
Let me rephrase. Neither John Podesta, his Satanist she-devil woman, nor Hillary Clinton are going to be president of the United States of America.

And I voted for Hillary Clinton, knowing fully well what she is because I know fully well what Trump is. It was the lesser of two evils, and the only option I had. I'm sure you feel far different, and that's fine, but I vehemently disagree with you. Not voting at all was nothing but moral cowardice; it was an option I couldn't benefit myself of.
Click to expand...

Bless your ❤️
 

Attachments

  • IMG_6217.JPG
    IMG_6217.JPG
    52 KB · Views: 0
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#290
#290
SamRebel35 said:
You voted for Hillary,a sex trafficker. I didn't vote for Hillary or Trump. I win the moral clarity Olympics! You have to now defend your decision to vote for a sex trafficker. Try not to bring up Trump. You had the option to vote for neither, but you chose child sex trafficker. Way to go!
Click to expand...

Did you vote for anyone, or did you just sit it out, like a coward?
 
#291
#291
tumscalcium said:
You voted for her because you're an ultra-lib dumbass. We already knew this.
Click to expand...

I voted for her because I see the world in nuance, unlike yourself, and because I thought her a more "manly" leader and mentally stable, unlike the only other guy who stood a chance of winning. That and she pays taxes.

I voted for neither in the primaries.

It was really as simple as that.
 
#292
#292
volprof said:
Did you vote for anyone, or did you just sit it out, like a coward?
Click to expand...

Johnson 2016. Not suspected for sex trafficking. Not suspected for child molesting. Just a goofy/slightly stupid guy who is mostly for individual liberty. Keep defending your favorite pedophile enabling felon in your relativist society.
 
#293
#293
SamRebel35 said:
Johnson 2016. Not suspected for sex trafficking. Not suspected for child molesting. Just a goofy/slightly stupid guy who is mostly for individual liberty. Keep defending your favorite pedophile enabling felon in your relativist society.
Click to expand...

So you made a "vote of conscience."

Good for you. You win the moral exceptionalism award.

And I've never once defended Clinton or any of her crimes, real or imagined even.
 
#295
#295
volprof said:
So you made a "vote of conscience."

Good for you. You win the moral exceptionalism award.

And I've never once defended Clinton or any of her crimes, real or imagined even.
Click to expand...

Stop hijacking this thread you imbecile. You've managed to completely change the topic. This is about the investigation of a pedophilia ring which could involve countless high profile politicians on both sides of the aisle. This isn't about Trump vs Hillary. It is like you are completely incapable of viewing events through any prism other than your own political viewfinder. If you have questions about the topic or have something to add to this particular conversation, feel free. Otherwise, get bent.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5 people
#297
#297
Rasputin_Vol said:
Yet a year ago, he was claiming to be ago republican...
Click to expand...

Although I have been trending more conservative (and not necessarily in contemporary America's bizarre construct of conservatism) for a while now, the immediate impetus to me registering Republican was Donald Trump.

So, yes, you are correct.
 
#298
#298
SamRebel35 said:
Stop hijacking this thread you imbecile. You've managed to completely change the topic. This is about the investigation of a pedophilia ring which could involve countless high profile politicians on both sides of the aisle. This isn't about Trump vs Hillary. It is like you are completely incapable of viewing events through any prism other than your own political viewfinder. If you have questions about the topic or have something to add to this particular conversation, feel free. Otherwise, get bent.
Click to expand...

Just ignore me then and stop changing the topic with me.
 
#299
#299
SamRebel35 said:
LG, I'd like to hear your thoughts on this article. We are in a child porn epidemic where suppliers and purchasers are not just dumb rednecks in trailer parks. Do you still think it is absurd that there is possibly a child sex trafficking ring which could implicate several high profile politicians? Why is this such an impossibility in your eyes?

https://medium.com/@LoriHandrahan2/daniel-rosen-s-arrest-1f7befb1762c#.vtlj3c9fj
Click to expand...

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TPCsm-MgpTg[/youtube]
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top