Recruiting Forum Football Talk XXX

Status
Not open for further replies.
Easily.

Myles Garrett is the next Bruce Smith. He'll have a Hall of Fame NFL career.

Derek Barnett is the next Michael Bennett or Charles Johnson. He'll be a good 10 year starter. Might even make a pro-bowl or two.

But he's not a transcendent player like Garrett.

Truly amazing how all your comparisons for these kids like Dobbs and Garrett are to all time greats like Cunningham and Bruce Smith.

Bruce smith dominated college. He didn't slack off and just feed off scrubs. So Myles Garrett doesn't do anything vs SEC competition yet he is going to be a hall of fame DE in pros? People falling in love with the outside physical look and ignoring the obvious red flags that there is some internal drive missing with that kid
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
What is interesting with the coaching rumor mill is lack of Lane Kiffin talk. We know he is going to be a HC somewhere next year. I got a feeling he will get a job nobody is expecting with it being so quiet right now
 
Truly amazing how all your comparisons for these kids like Dobbs and Garrett are to all time greats like Cunningham and Bruce Smith.

Bruce smith dominated college. He didn't slack off and just feed off scrubs. So Myles Garrett doesn't do anything vs SEC competition yet he is going to be a hall of fame DE in pros? People falling in love with the outside physical look and ignoring the obvious red flags that there is some internal drive missing with that kid

Well thats the difference between me and you. You focus on stats. When I'm comparing players I don't look at how they compare statistically. I compare them based on physical build, the way they move, the way they play.

Garrett physically resembles Bruce Smith. Both have similar height, weight, and body shape. Both have similar gaits in the way they move. When I watch film of Bruce Smith I see Myles Garrett. That is why I compare them.

We'll see soon enough if Myles Garrett is as great as he looks.
 
Easily.

Myles Garrett is the next Bruce Smith. He'll have a Hall of Fame NFL career.

Derek Barnett is the next Michael Bennett or Charles Johnson. He'll be a good 10 year starter. Might even make a pro-bowl or two.

But he's not a transcendent player like Garrett.
Garrett sucks dude.He inflates his stats against weak competition.He's as soft as a new born baby and will get man handled by NFL left tackles.Barnett all day every day.Barnett is a football player.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
What is interesting with the coaching rumor mill is lack of Lane Kiffin talk. We know he is going to be a HC somewhere next year. I got a feeling he will get a job nobody is expecting with it being so quiet right now

Saban retires, and Kiffin takes the reins, then promptly destroys all of Saban's work in less than 2 years.
 
Well thats the difference between me and you. You focus on stats. When I'm comparing players I don't look at how they compare statistically. I compare them based on physical build, the way they move, the way they play.

Garrett physically resembles Bruce Smith. Both have similar height, weight, and body shape. Both have similar gaits in the way they move. When I watch film of Bruce Smith I see Myles Garrett. That is why I compare them.

We'll see soon enough if Myles Garrett is as great as he looks.

He will be a bust you got caught up in the hype just like ESPN with him being the number one recruit in the country a few years ago he takes plays off can't play The Run and is not very physical. Looks like Tarzan plays like Jane. And don't ever compare this guy to Bruce Smith that's an insult it's almost as bad as everybody thinking kongbo was as good as John Henderson
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
You expect Garrett to dominate in the NFL when he can't even dominate good teams in college? All that "physical specimen" stuff hasn't helped him be anything but below average against SEC teams.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
Well thats the difference between me and you. You focus on stats. When I'm comparing players I don't look at how they compare statistically. I compare them based on physical build, the way they move, the way they play.

Garrett physically resembles Bruce Smith. Both have similar height, weight, and body shape. Both have similar gaits in the way they move. When I watch film of Bruce Smith I see Myles Garrett. That is why I compare them.

We'll see soon enough if Myles Garrett is as great as he looks.

Your a joke. Hall of famers dominate competiton at all levels. Don't compare someone to a hall of famer if they can't even do it when t matters in college. How can you not take into account production? That is silly. You take in all aspects. Garret prob will be decent in NFL if he finds someone to wake him up but he won't live up to the expectations people will have of him because of his appearance
 
I agree Barnett is the better college player.


But it's pretty obvious Garret has the higher upside long term.
Based on the fact that he is 2" taller than Barnett? Because that and the fact that he was the #1 HS recruit are literally the only two things I can think of?
 
Your a joke. Hall of famers dominate competiton at all levels. Don't compare someone to a hall of famer if they can't even do it when t matters in college. How can you not take into account production? That is silly. You take in all aspects. Garret prob will be decent in NFL if he finds someone to wake him up but he won't live up to the expectations people will have of him because of his appearance

Aundray Bruce was a helluva physical specimen. Wrought comparisons to LT "physically". Who, you say? Exactly. :)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Advertisement





Back
Top