2016 Election Thread Part Deux

#10,128
#10,128
All the battleground polls trending down for Clinton


Battlegrounds Clinton Trump Spread
Minnesota 45.3 40.3 Clinton +5.0Trending Up
Colorado 44.6 38.4 Clinton +6.2Trending Down
Virginia 46.0 38.8 Clinton +7.2Trending Down
Georgia 42.3 46.3 Trump +4.0
New Hampshire 44.8 36.8 Clinton +8.0
Maine 42.0 36.8 Clinton +5.2
Arizona 41.8 40.5 Clinton +1.3

Battlegrounds Clinton Trump Spread
Florida 46.8 43.7 Clinton +3.1Trending Down
Ohio 43.7 44.8 Trump +1.1Trending Up
Pennsylvania 46.2 40.5 Clinton +5.7Trending Down
Wisconsin 45.0 38.5 Clinton +6.5Trending Down
North Carolina 45.8 43.8 Clinton +2.0Trending Down
Iowa 38.0 41.7 Trump +3.7
Nevada 45.7 42.1 Clinton +3.6
 
#10,133
#10,133
GAVol said:
I get that. But I'm not seeing him losing Georgia,. by double digits like some of those polls Carlos posted have said.

I saw this exact polling in the 2014 Senate race. The Democrat supposedly had a narrow lead in October and it was pretty much a statistical tie on election day in many polls. Then the Republican won by 8.
Click to expand...

The only polls I I've seen him losing by are 2-4%. The double digit swing is in comparison to Isakson.

And, yes, polls are often wrong. No argument there.
 
#10,138
#10,138
If you're looking to Make America Pedo Again or to whore out your own daughter, perhaps even literally, then Gropey Don is your man!

Inside Donald Trump?s One-Stop Parties: Attendees Recall Cocaine and Very Young Models - The Daily Beast

Never let it be said that the media hasn't covered for this guy. The media has covered quite a bit for this guy, admittedly not because of any high moral sense, but because they know the man is so sick and depraved that exposing his sickness in its starkness would actually be bad for ratings - because he would be out like that. Bad for ratings.
 
#10,139
#10,139
As I have noted before, especially regarding some of our posters here, the notion of being anti-American and anti-democratic is completely arbitrary in the mind of the truly anti-American and anti-democratic heart. The right possesses its own SJWs, at least in mentality, and the left possesses its own Alt-Righters.

Just two sides of the same coin. God knows how they got directed in opposite sides of the political spectrum, but the ultimate intent is still the same.

With Trump, Republicans and conservatives that followed the man finally admitted that it's all a sham - blood brothers for life with their SJW inverted brethren.

#SJWTrumpLife

https://www.commentarymagazine.com/politics-ideas/donald-trump-contagious-totalitarianism/
 
#10,143
#10,143
volprof said:
For the longest time, I couldn't make sense out of the cognitive dissonance of the Trumpers.

Then, one day, I had a moment of enlightenment. I realized that Trumpers are half-literate. The proof was many of the posters on this site, who can hardly read. Some can hardly even put together a coherent point.

Once I realized this fact, everything made sense. Trump made sense. Trumpers made sense. Trumpism made sense.
Click to expand...

But being a batshiet crazy globalist with a 21 times Lolita "pedophile" Express husband who, as POTUS, sucked on cigars shoved up his interns twat and his undersecretary of state said this...
----------------------
“In the next century, nations as we know it will be obsolete; all states will recognize a single, global authority. National sovereignty wasn’t such a great idea after all.”
Strobe Talbot, President Clinton’s Deputy Secretary of State, as quoted in Time, July 20th, l992.
-------------------------

is preferable, eh?

You're political rants are as much ding dong bell as HiLIARly is crazy.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#10,144
#10,144
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vol8188 View Post
About a week ago in this thread you told me it was impossible to have freedom without violating the freedoms of others

volprof said:
And I said it was one of the most incoherent posts in the history of the forum, which it was.
Click to expand...

If your freedom of speech permits you to drown out a funeral or to block what a speaker has to say, then very obviously, your freedom violates the freedom of others. If your freedom to drive in any manner that you want causes you to run down someone crossing the street in accordance with a traffic signal, then you have obviously violated that person's freedom. Will that suffice or do you need more?

Freedom comes with responsibility - at least rational freedom - and that automatically means that there is no such thing as unfettered freedom that doesn't potentially trample another's freedom. Can my freedom and your freedom exist in harmony? Yes, if there's enough separation to provide isolation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#10,147
#10,147
carlos86 said:
You just used a video from 2 years ago to show a glitch in the software that was solved.
Click to expand...

If Trump pulls a miracle and wins, that software glitch will mysteriously be the culprit along with Russians hacking the machines.

There is a reason the dems keep beating that drum.
 
#10,148
#10,148
Orangedogsrule said:
But being a batshiet crazy globalist with a 21 times Lolita "pedophile" Express husband who, as POTUS, sucked on cigars shoved up his interns twat and his undersecretaty of state said this...
----------------------
“In the next century, nations as we know it will be obsolete; all states will recognize a single, global authority. National sovereignty wasn’t such a great idea after all.”
Strobe Talbot, President Clinton’s Deputy Secretary of State, as quoted in Time, July 20th, l992.
-------------------------

is preferable, eh?

You're political rants are as much ding dong bell as HiLIARly is crazy.
Click to expand...

Take your morally relativistic trash and flee from me, sir.
 
#10,149
#10,149
AM64 said:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vol8188 View Post
About a week ago in this thread you told me it was impossible to have freedom without violating the freedoms of others



If your freedom of speech permits you to drown out a funeral or to block what a speaker has to say, then very obviously, your freedom violates the freedom of others. If your freedom to drive in any manner that you want causes you to run down someone crossing the street in accordance with a traffic signal, then you have obviously violated that person's freedom. Will that suffice or do you need more?

Freedom comes with responsibility - at least rational freedom - and that automatically means that there is no such thing as unfettered freedom that doesn't potentially trample another's freedom. Can my freedom and your freedom exist in harmony? Yes, if there's enough separation to provide isolation.
Click to expand...

Thank you, Captain Obvious.

The poster in question's response to the original comment at question was in reference to something making his post completely ridiculous.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top