Hillary proposes drone strike on Assange

#28
#28
Septic said:
A. What makes that factual?

B. How could you possibly know if she's wasn't kidding?

3. Why can't we just drone this guy?

Assange is about as dangerous to the United States as any terrorist. You think he's going to stop if Trump wins?
Click to expand...

Well documented Hillary has no sense of humor. She's a political robot.

We can't drone someone for embarrassing us. Traces right back to us and opens up all sorts of international criticism. CIA wetworks team far more appropriate. Doesn't matter if the "accident" is suspicious as long as it can't be directly traced back to us.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#29
#29
Weezer said:
Well documented Hillary has no sense of humor. She's a political robot.

We can't drone someone for embarrassing us. Traces right back to us and opens up all sorts of international criticism. CIA wetworks team far more appropriate. Doesn't matter if the "accident" is suspicious as long as it can't be directly traced back to us.
Click to expand...

Oooh wetworks :crazy:
 
#30
#30
Keep in mind that this quote from Hillary did not come from a wikileaks dump but from an anonymous quote to a right leaning blog. I am not certain she said this.

If she did, and was not joking, it is indefensible. But again, I do not give anonymous quotes to right leaning blogs any credibility and have my doubts about whether she ever said this.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#31
#31
She figures this would set a precedence then she could go after the women who come forward claiming affairs with her husband with drone strikes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#32
#32
jackaro said:
Keep in mind that this quote from Hillary did not come from a wikileaks dump but from an anonymous quote to a right leaning blog. I am not certain she said this.

If she did, and was not joking, it is indefensible. But again, I do not give anonymous quotes to right leaning blogs any credibility and have my doubts about whether she ever said this.
Click to expand...

Nothing that wikileaks releases comes from wikileaks. They get information from whistle-blowers, vet the information exhaustively, and then release it. They would not have Tweeted this without vetting the authenticity.
 
#35
#35
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#36
#36
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#37
#37
IBlvNTmWrk said:
I believe the conclusion from snopes was UNPROVEN... not "false". I know it may have been difficult for you to have seen since it was in big, red, bold letters right at the top of the page.
Click to expand...

The existence of rainbow farting unicorn's in my garden are also "unproven".

I feel like we've had this discussion before.

Evidence matters. Right?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#38
#38
Septic said:
The existence of rainbow farting unicorn's in my garden are also "unproven".

I feel like we've had this discussion before.

Evidence matters. Right?
Click to expand...

That really depends on what side your on, if your on the left not so much.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#39
#39
hog88 said:
That really depends on what side your on, if your on the left not so much.
Click to expand...

Anyone who sees value in intellectual honesty will value evidence over rumor.

Left or right - only facts should matter.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#40
#40
SamRebel35 said:
Nothing that wikileaks releases comes from wikileaks. They get information from whistle-blowers, vet the information exhaustively, and then release it. They would not have Tweeted this without vetting the authenticity.
Click to expand...

Yep Wikileaks has never been wrong
 
#41
#41
Septic said:
Anyone who sees value in intellectual honesty will value evidence over rumor.

Left or right - only facts should matter.
Click to expand...

Except that those on the left have no values and intellectual honesty is a completely foreign concept to them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#42
#42
lawgator1 said:
Another false, alt right, lunatic fringe, unsourced, strung together, piece of crap.

To Silence Wikileaks, Hillary Clinton Proposed Drone Strike on Julian Assange? : snopes.com
Click to expand...

As some have already pointed out, the conclusion wasn't called false, but unproven. They felt the sources were vague. So it could be true or it could be false. I, for one, have no problem believing Hillary is capable of such a thing. Whether she said it or not, I have no doubt she would do it, without remorse.

And I'll be honest, in this case, I could understand neutralization. The man is releasing U.S. intelligence and there's no telling what information he has. But a drone strike would be far too obvious and blatant. Major govts., ours included, has assassins. They arrange for "accidents" to happen. That would have been the route to take, imo.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#45
#45
hog88 said:
That really depends on what side your on, if your on the left not so much.
Click to expand...

This is how the left operates they deny and deny with the help of a complicit media and then when it is brought up again they claim it was discredited...no it was ignored or covered up
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#46
#46
Septic said:
Anyone who sees value in intellectual honesty will value evidence over rumor.

Left or right - only facts should matter.
Click to expand...

Those who truly support Hillary place no value on fact. Fact - Hillary violated national security protocol with her private email and put our national security at undue risk. Fact - Through lies and destroying evidence, Hillary hindered an investigation of what she had done. Fact - This isn't Hillary's first time hindering an investigation. When Vince Foster died, she had her aides clear out his office before the DoJ could even begin its investigation. These are just a few of the facts. There are many more, but I think you get the picture.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#47
#47
Weezer said:
Those who truly support Hillary place no value on fact. Fact - Hillary violated national security protocol with her private email and put our national security at undue risk. Fact - Through lies and destroying evidence, Hillary hindered an investigation of what she had done. Fact - This isn't Hillary's first time hindering an investigation. When Vince Foster died, she had her aides clear out his office before the DoJ could even begin its investigation. These are just a few of the facts. There are many more, but I think you get the picture.
Click to expand...

But those facts are irrelevant because Trump is literally Hitler. Also, he is a Russian plant.
 
#49
#49
ClearwaterVol said:
Trump is creating a tin foil wearing lunatic fringe following mass of crazy disciples. :popcorn:
Click to expand...

He's going to need a bigger basket.

We'll all be crying in the end but the tears from the Trump neophytes will definitely be the sweetest.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#50
#50
jackaro said:
Keep in mind that this quote from Hillary did not come from a wikileaks dump but from an anonymous quote to a right leaning blog. I am not certain she said this.

If she did, and was not joking, it is indefensible. But again, I do not give anonymous quotes to right leaning blogs any credibility and have my doubts about whether she ever said this.
Click to expand...

Oh, and you do give credibility to left leaning sources. One of such could be CNN, eh?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top