Depth Chart released

#51
#51
People are worried about the secondary when that seems to be Shoop's favorite unit of focus?

Fools.

Personally I see no reason to worry. It very well could be that Shoop knew he had a ton of talent but wanted to sort out how to best use it.

Some though probably think he spent more time there because he didn't think they were very good.

Either way, it seems a good investment of time considering the issues UT had in the secondary last year.

When you get a new job, you can fail at some things. But you can't fail at the same thing the last guy go fired for.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#52
#52
That's it Butchna. Abernathy (and Warrior) playing so well allowed them to move Rashaan back to nickle where his skillset is even better suited. Would've made a very good safety, likely makes an excellent to great nickle.

Don't forget that first and foremost Shoop is a DB expert and second a total defense expert. With him here I see our DBs helping our DL and our DL helping our DBs. They go hand and hand. Look for more takeaways this year whether it be fumbles or interceptions.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#54
#54
Uhh why do you say that exactly?

I like Dormady. I want us to redshirt JG.

I took your "interesting" comment as more a spotlight at the disappearance of Sheriron...surprised that the coaches aren't playing the depth chart shell game differently.
 
#56
#56
I didn't take the time to go back and look at who it was. There were more than one.

If it is a relative or friend then that's news to me.

Don't go literal on me man...I was backing you up. I meant that some posters on here take these decisions PERSONALLY...way too much so.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#57
#57
It will be fine.

Some of it is to send a message to the guys currently listed as #2.

A lot of guys should play week 1.

And bottom line is that it's all subject to revision, week to week.

A two deep is basically your starting rotation. Pretty much everyone on that list is "1st string".... plus probably a few more. You have to believe that George and Johnson at least get some PT at WR. They'll likely go deeper at TE. Kelly is almost certain to get some 1st string carries at RB over the course of the year.

DE is so deep you have to think at least 6 of them get rotated in. They'll play as many as they have at DT. Not sure about LB but some young guys have received enough positive press to suggest they'll play.


There are a lot of guys good enough to rotate in.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#58
#58
Don't forget that first and foremost Shoop is a DB expert and second a total defense expert. With him here I see our DBs helping our DL and our DL helping our DBs. They go hand and hand. Look for more takeaways this year whether it be fumbles or interceptions.

It's an advantage as long as we keep him. Translated pretty well for Saban. Good point on the turnovers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#59
#59
To avoid starting a thread...

is there a practice today? Fingers? I'm figuring this would be equivalent to Monday practice on game week?
 
#60
#60
Don't go literal on me man...I was backing you up. I meant that some posters on here take these decisions PERSONALLY...way too much so.

Sorry. I thought maybe I was arguing with someone's 4th cousin who has now become a rabid Vol fan...:)

No doubt you are right about some getting too locked up over it. Some guys will emerge. Unfortunately, there's a better chance than not that someone will have an opportunity due to injury.

Just glad to be able to "argue" over who is listed first, second, and even third. In August 2009, Dan Williams was really UT's only SEC caliber DT. I seem to remember Wes Brown being the 2nd DT.... at around 270 lbs. He was a DE with bad knees.
 
#61
#61
It's an advantage as long as we keep him. Translated pretty well for Saban. Good point on the turnovers.

I think "Shoops" affect spills over on to our offense also. The offense is having to go up against his extravagant formations and blitzes. It's a win win situation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#63
#63
A shocker for me was not Richmond starting at LT but a true freshman shown as his #2 behind him, that kid must be very good.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#65
#65
It doesn't mean much with the D line. I expect to see everybody rotating in all game. That's ideal. Keep everybody fresh. Being named a starter is a reward for leadership and or hard work. I expect a different depth chart for the VT game as far as the d line goes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#68
#68
A shocker for me was not Richmond starting at LT but a true freshman shown as his #2 behind him, that kid must be very good.

Nice compliment to his work but it seems more likely that someone else would be moved to LT if something happened to Richmond. Probably Hall if he's healthy.
 
#69
#69
I was being sarcastic, in another thread there were some posters(I don't remember which ones) that were saying Dormady would be replaced JG as the back up this year.

IMO, it is like Dobbs and Peterman. They wanted to RS Dobbs but when Worley was injured the "real" 2nd string QB took over after Peterman got his shot early vs Bama.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
#70
#70
Exactly. Dormady is the best back up for now. If Dobbs was done for the year and we needed to get ready for the future then they would burn the rs and JG would come in.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#71
#71
I also cringe when I see Moseley starting. Would rather have Martin opposite Cam. JMO

Well, it seems that after a hard fought competition.... Moseley won the job. Not totally surprising. He led the team in passes defended, had a pick, and was 2nd among CB's to Sutton in tackles last year while not being a full time starter.

Like many, he was a guy playing early and getting more OJT than you really would have wanted for him. He was a HS QB learning to play CB.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#72
#72
Exactly. Dormady is the best back up for now. If Dobbs was done for the year and we needed to get ready for the future then they would burn the rs and JG would come in.

I should say that I think Dormady is A LOT closer to being the "real" 2nd string guy than Peterman was.

Glad Nate had a good year at Pitt.... but not unhappy with Jones' choice to start Dobbs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#73
#73
Well, it seems that after a hard fought competition.... Moseley won the job. Not totally surprising. He led the team in passes defended, had a pick, and was 2nd among CB's to Sutton in tackles last year while not being a full time starter.

Like many, he was a guy playing early and getting more OJT than you really would have wanted for him. He was a HS QB learning to play CB.

I also don't get the hate for Moseley...everyone gets burnt sometimes..guy will play in the league imo...remember Coleman? Yeah he's cashing Patriot checks now

2014 snaps: 370
2014 PFF rating: 76.6

Presented is a cornerback who fought his way through depth under a snap limitation that emerged in Knoxville, but Moseley amazingly did his work as a true freshman. Seriously, how much of an impact could an 18-year-old really have had in defensive coverage? He simply allowed a lower completion percentage (36.0 vs. 43.9), yards/coverage snap (0.66 vs. 0.68), and coverage snap/reception allowed (12.1 vs. 13.6) than Florida’s Vernon Hargreaves III. The sky is the limit for this sophomore out of Greensboro, North Carolina.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#74
#74
Sorry. I thought maybe I was arguing with someone's 4th cousin who has now become a rabid Vol fan...:)

No doubt you are right about some getting too locked up over it. Some guys will emerge. Unfortunately, there's a better chance than not that someone will have an opportunity due to injury.

Just glad to be able to "argue" over who is listed first, second, and even third. In August 2009, Dan Williams was really UT's only SEC caliber DT. I seem to remember Wes Brown being the 2nd DT.... at around 270 lbs. He was a DE with bad knees.

Agreed...total 180 in talent...remember when we were hoping a Greg Clark or Darren Gooch would pan out?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#75
#75
He did last year. He is starting because he is a very good DT. He has good strength and has good technique. Khalil is not a bust. Both will play, but O'brien should be the starter. It is finally great to have two good players at critical positions.

I don't see Trent Thompson (Georgia) listed as a backup. I don't see Terry Beckner (Missouri) listed as a backup. The other 5 star DTs from his class were already starting LAST YEAR. There is no way they would still be backups as SOPHOMORES.

Hate to say it but Kahlil is looking like a bust. There is no excuse for him not beating out a mediocre talent like Danny O'Brien. Its not like the guys he's playing behind are gonna be high NFL draft picks. Both Vickers and O'Brien are fringe NFL players at best.

All in all I'm super disappointed in him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Advertisement



Back
Top