2016 Election Thread Part Deux

#7,076
#7,076
hog88 said:
He does have this I'll kick your ass tone, can't figure out where it comes from.
Click to expand...

It comes from the certainty of never having to own his remarks...everybody is a tough guy on the phone, internet, in traffic...except for the guy i sleeved in the temple a decade ago and literqlly knocked the slobber out of his mouth in a parking lot with his wife/girlfriend sitting right next to him. He didnt attempt to get out of the car while he was tryimg to figure out what area code he was in. Guess he shouldnt have started cussing at me at full volume in front of my wife. Sometimes that certain safety isnt so certain. But here on the net, b3hind the anonymity of a keyboard...evwrybody is a tough guy...and everybody is a smartazz...i hqve gotten used to it. Made it to a place where i cant be angered by words on a screen. Hopefully by screaming morons in pqrkong lots either. Thankfully i have grown up a lil bit
And no...i am not a tough guy. Just a real, hard working , blue collar American.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#7,080
#7,080
ETV said:
Saw that. It's plastered all over CNN and the writer used Trump's vague comment as a call for harm against her.

It's Trump's mistake for not going into detail about his comment, i.e. as a legislative issue/NRA members, etc. but for that journalist to begin speculating and printing that it's a call for assassination, ********* believable!
Click to expand...

It's shocking how oblivious you are with regard to Trump's statement.

I'm wondering where hog is and when he's going to try and defend this epically stupid move by Trump.
 
#7,081
#7,081
Coug said:
It's shocking how oblivious you are with regard to Trump's statement.

I'm wondering where hog is and when he's going to try and defend this epically stupid move by Trump.
Click to expand...

What's to defend? He obviously called for her assassination and I'm surprised the secret service hasn't placed him in custody.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#7,084
#7,084
mrorange211 said:
You are the king of justification. Your only retort ever is to introduce some hypothetical scenario in which HRC would be treated better. It's dumb.
Click to expand...

That's exactly what would happen. The stuff that Hillary has actually done is less of a talking point with MSM than an indirect statement from Trump that has zero literal threat.

Personally I think he meant to form a militia and take the government back if that happens. I also think he was being a farceur in regards to that end.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#7,085
#7,085
Coug said:
It's shocking how oblivious you are with regard to Trump's statement.

I'm wondering where hog is and when he's going to try and defend this epically stupid move by Trump.
Click to expand...

It's funny to me how the press portrays Trump as a fearmonger, but when he says 2A people can do something about Hillary picking judges it's OMG HES GOING TO KILL HER!!!!!! Now who's trying to use fear again?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#7,087
#7,087
mrorange211 said:
You are the king of justification. Your only retort ever is to introduce some hypothetical scenario in which HRC would be treated better. It's dumb.
Click to expand...

Let's see here, you are saying that HRC doesn't get treated differently than Trump? It's obvious with the media bias she recieves, sorry you can't see that.

If Trump got caught swatting a fly, HRC and the media would be calling him a killer. The **** sticks to the wall with him, unlike her.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#7,088
#7,088
Coug said:
It's shocking how oblivious you are with regard to Trump's statement.

I'm wondering where hog is and when he's going to try and defend this epically stupid move by Trump.
Click to expand...

So did you even ready my post? I'll say it again...it's Trump mistake for not going into detail and he'll have to deal with this. I understand the ramifications with his off the cuff remark.

However, when the MSM refuses to even investigate the matter by contacting DT's manager or reps and goes straight to print with "Trump calling for 2A folks to harm HRC" is a bit of a reach.

Even you should recognize the amount of bias that is.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#7,089
#7,089
utvols88 said:
That's exactly what would happen. The stuff that Hillary has actually done is less of a talking point with MSM than an indirect statement from Trump that has zero literal threat.

Personally I think he meant to form a militia and take the government back if that happens. I also think he was being a farceur in regards to that end.
Click to expand...

Honestly, if she wins in November and her first order of business is to EO her way around 2A and attempt to pass legislation, you may see what you think he meant.
 
#7,090
#7,090
AirVol said:
Let's see here, you are saying that HRC doesn't get treated differently than Trump? It's obvious with the media bias she recieves, sorry you can't see that.

If Trump got caught swatting a fly, HRC and the media would be calling him a killer. The **** sticks to the wall with him, unlike her.
Click to expand...

I agree Hillary gets treated better but Trump feeds off the reaction of the crowds at his rally's and can't help but say stupid ****. He needs to just shut his trap and the press will have nothing to write about. Instead he can't wait to get infront of a microphone. If he shuts up her screw ups will have to be the story. His giving this election away
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#7,091
#7,091
Imagine if Trump had the father of the mass murderer of homosexuals at the Pulse nightclub on stage with him. All the media would be talking about was how big of a gay hater Trump obviously was and that by doing so he's probably indirectly promoting mass murder.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
#7,092
#7,092
theFallGuy said:
Imagine if Trump had the father of the mass murderer of homosexuals at the Pulse nightclub on stage with him. All the media would be talking about was how big of a gay hater Trump obviously was and that by doing so he's probably indirectly promoting mass murder.
Click to expand...

Plus the father is an open supporter of the Taliban. Or Tallybahn, sorry Mr. President.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#7,093
#7,093
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/24/us/politics/24clinton.html?_r=0

Gee, remember that time Hillary talked about an assassination?

"Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton defended staying in the Democratic nominating contest on Friday by pointing out that her husband had not wrapped up the nomination until June 1992, adding, “We all remember Bobby Kennedy was assassinated in June in California.”

This was all in reference to Obama.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
#7,094
#7,094
theFallGuy said:
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/24/us/politics/24clinton.html?_r=0

Gee, remember that time Hillary talked about an assassination?

"Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton defended staying in the Democratic nominating contest on Friday by pointing out that her husband had not wrapped up the nomination until June 1992, adding, “We all remember Bobby Kennedy was assassinated in June in California.”

This was all in reference to Obama.
Click to expand...

So were Trump's comments referring to an assassination or not?

You Trumpers have my mind running around in circles, just like your godhead.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#7,095
#7,095
Biden assured gun owners during the 2008 presidential race that President Barack Obama would not take away their guns. “I guarantee ya, Barack Obama ain’t takin’ my shotgun, so don’t buy that malarky. . . I got two, and if he [Obama] tries to fool with my Beretta, he’s got a problem!” Biden said in 2008.

Biden: No One?s Taking My Shotguns
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#7,098
#7,098
mrorange211 said:
See, I didn't really take his comments in that way. I took it more in a "those 2nd amendment people have guns and can take back the govt if they want" kinda way. I'm definitely in the minority it appears.
Click to expand...

Hog is being sarcastic. He thinks some of us are overreacting that a persistent idiot, who many dimwits nationwide take very serious, keeps saying things advocating violence and hatred towards certain individuals or groups. Hog isn't affected by any of this, because he is included in none of these targeted groups, so he doesn't care, making it all just a joke to him. He thinks everyone ought to just get their panties out of a wad and suck it up and be tough.
 
Last edited:
#7,099
#7,099
volprof said:
Hog is being sarcastic. He thinks some of us are overreacting that a persistent idiot, who many dimwits nationwide take very serious, keeps saying things advocating violence and hatred towards certain individuals or groups. Hog isn't affected by any of this, because he is included in none of these targeted groups, so he doesn't care, making it all just a joke to him. He thinks everyone ought to just get their panties out of a wad and suck it up and be tough.
Click to expand...

Actually no you have it wrong. I absolutely do think he should be arrested or at least brought in for questioning concerning these remarks.

I do however think in the general scheme of things people need to get their panties out of a wad and have a sense of humor.
 
#7,100
#7,100
mrorange211 said:
See, I didn't really take his comments in that way. I took it more in a "those 2nd amendment people have guns and can take back the govt if they want" kinda way. I'm definitely in the minority it appears.
Click to expand...

I have to agree. I took it to mean if Hillary (the government) shows up to confiscate guns, gun owners will shoot the confiscators. I don't think it means assassinate Hillary. Americans will not be disarmed and shooting back is exactly what would happen.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top