2016 Election Thread Part Deux

#6,926
#6,926
lawgator1 said:
Neither.

I would tell her to just be honest that she did not realize it was that big a deal and really did not understand technology and how easily emails and servers can be hacked, cloned, etc. Meant no harm of course, just did not pay attention to it like she should have.
Click to expand...

So admit that she refused to listen to expert advisors. Yep, that's a good trait for a Chief Executive.
 
#6,927
#6,927
McDad said:
That's my thinking as well. The clintons are masterful at the business of politics. They dont really care about politics but they care about the business they can do from their political power and connections.
Click to expand...

Precisely.
 
#6,931
#6,931
hog88 said:
So admit that she refused to listen to expert advisors. Yep, that's a good trait for a Chief Executive.
Click to expand...


It's a bad one and I've no problem at all if people want to take that into account in whether to vote for her. I certainly factor that in.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#6,932
#6,932
lawgator1 said:
What evidence is there that she meant harm?

Be specific.
Click to expand...

I am not an investigator so any evidence I would give is public and circumstantial. But I would begin with why would she have a reason to have a server at home on which she would be conducting official business and would possibly contain very sensitive information? Why would she think it would be ok for her to make the determination on what could be deleted? Unless maybe there was something to hide?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#6,942
#6,942
McDad said:
Bet you didn't know that when people talk about a firewall they're not talking about a wall made of flames.

:)
Click to expand...
I still remember some PSA radio ad about parents learning about computers.

"When my son mentioned a cursor, I thought he was talking about some rude kid."
 
#6,943
#6,943
lawgator1 said:
Neither.

I would tell her to just be honest that she did not realize it was that big a deal and really did not understand technology and how easily emails and servers can be hacked, cloned, etc. Meant no harm of course, just did not pay attention to it like she should have.
Click to expand...
ANd that would be a bald faced lie counselor and you know it.
 
#6,945
#6,945
lawgator1 said:
It's a ridiculous answer.

The truth is that when this came up she wanted to have her own email server so she could do any personal or political-related emails in a way she thought would remain private. She simply did not consider the issue of email security -- very few people did at that time, and certainly not nearly like people do now -- and to whatever extent anyone was advising otherwise, she did not put enough weight on that concern.

That is the truth. If she could just figure out a way to say that i think most people would believe her.
Click to expand...
So then she is too ****ing naive to be POTUS. :clapping::clapping: wake the **** up.
 
#6,949
#6,949
VolStrom said:
She set up a private email server so it wouldn't be subject to the freedom of information act.
Click to expand...


I think you may be right. Or at least that she thought having her own server would limit inquiring minds. But you've got people itt thinking she did this for a nefarious purpose, as opposed to just love of secrecy. I see a distinction, even if others do not.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#6,950
#6,950
lawgator1 said:
I think you may be right. Or at least that she thought having her own server would limit inquiring minds. But you've got people itt thinking she did this for a nefarious purpose, as opposed to just love of secrecy. I see a distinction, even if others do not.
Click to expand...
:eek:lol::eek:lol::eek:lol::eek:lol::lolabove:

What a good little soldier you are.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top