Tin Man
Dirt's Childhood Playmate
- Joined
- Mar 9, 2015
- Messages
- 58,029
- Likes
- 57,138
Mills, dude. There is a huge amount of irony in saying, "who cares what anyone thinks" in a message board.
Message boards are all about nothing BUT caring what others think (reading) and hoping that others care what you think (writing). There is literally nothing else to the forums BUT that.
Well, and Freak making a bit of $$ off the ads.![]()
UT ended the season beating the #13 team by 39 points and is returning all the important parts. Thinking they deserve to be 3 spots above that isn't a stretch
Again, what the hell are you talking about? UGA has been more relevant than UF over the past 5 years. We also beat curb stomped a high ranked team in our bowl game and beat a high ranked South Carolina.
I get what you are saying, except in this case it wouldn't be a leap from 7-5 to a Top 10 team. That suggests a 1-season turnaround, which is not the case here. It's been 7-6 to 9-4 to preseason Top 10.
FTR, I don't know if UT is a Top 10 this season or not. What I do know is that they were 3-4 plays from being a playoff team last season, and that team, which lost very little talent, is one year more experienced, has had one more year in the S&C program, has had one more offseason to develop chemistry, has made a major upgrade at the DC. (which cost us at least 2 games last season, IMO)
But I really don't care if we start Top 10 or not. We won't know if we are a Top 10 contender or pretender until the UF game.
If it were a national writer, I'd agree with you.
That said, this smells like whipping the reds into a frenzy to get dem clicks.
I put very little stock in bowl game results, and neither should you.
Whomsoever this whackjob writer is artfully forgets or discounts we took the National Champs into the 4th quarter at their house and ended up only losing by 5 points. The national championship game by the same team blew Michigan State out of the stadium (as we did NW), the Spartans couldn't even give 'em a ball game. MSU was so bad it was not even a scrimmage for the Bammer 1s. Little beat writer may want to be sure MSU stays ranked ahead of us this year then. Dumb %$#@!*&^%$ers.
I put very little stock in bowl game results, and neither should you.
S Carolina? Ok.
Northwestern in a bowl game? Ok.
That is what you have to tender to us as your signature wins? Come on, certainly you can see that those wins aren't going to have people convinced.
I do agree with those who think UF ought to be a pretty easy win for you this year, so that is not going to do the trick, most likely. Fact is, you need to beat Alabama, either regular season or SEC c-game to get the full respect you think you deserve.
A lot of teams can say they were a half dozen plays from contending for something. I want to see you make those plays, against an Alabama, or even against a Florida, before I jump on the bandwagon.
On paper, yes, it makes total sense. And I'm ready to believe it. But there's still significant lingering doubt, for me anyway. Then again, I certainly come from a different perspective on the issue.
And in this respect he has succeeded.
Reminds me of the college football mags back in the 80s. Don't know if it is still the case, but they changed the cover depending on where the mag was going to be sold. If in Gainesville, it was a pic and lead story about the Gators, if Knoxville it was about UT.
Never did compare the content, but I'd not be surprised if it has all been about taking advantage of these loyalties, often times not very rational.
What a nonsensical argument. Only an idiot would think that has anything to do with the current season
I'm so tired of these click bait blogs just throwing out poorly written crap for the sake of a couple more pennies in ad revenue. But I guess it's hard to have pride in a job that's one step above a barista
A lot of teams can say they were a half dozen plays from contending for something.
I want to see you make those plays, against an Alabama, or even against a Florida, before I jump on the bandwagon.
Then again, I certainly come from a different perspective on the issue.
If my team had lost by 5 touchdowns to a comparably ranked team I'd probably have the same stance. But since you have an almost perfect record on VN picking the direction of future events I am more than happy to accept your prediction of failure. In fact, I welcome it
Of course it's relevant when the "writer" chooses to base his argument on past results.
Uhhhh NW was #13 and really, really wanted to win that game.
And the USC team I'm speaking of finished in the top ten.
You're not very bright. My guess is you're a "settlement specialist" lawyer. I doubt you win much with your lack of logical skills. Your poor clients.
Sure. But as I noted, Butch took steps to correct what cost us 2-3 of those plays when he hired Shoop. But that's JMO. Nobody has to agree with it.
I'm not asking you to jump on the bandwagon until after UT defeats UF,
Fair enough, because reading comments from gator fans in the "Whose expecting a double digit win over the gators" bait thread started by one of gator homers, there are more than a few gator homers that believe the gators are a whole lot better than the media is giving them credit.
It's fandom in the SEC.
I think this is just a reflection of the skepticism out there about whether the experience factor is really going to translate into W's. In years past, to make the leap from 7-5 also ran to 10 or 11 win top ten program, there's usually been a win or two over a big time opponent. Tennessee is missing that, so I think it's natural that people respect the potential of the Vols, but need to see that result on the field before committing.
Actually, it's a horrible argument. I'm fine saying that the Vols don't deserve a spot in the top 10 because he doesn't believe we're as talented as 10+ teams out there. But what does the past decade have to do with the 2016 preseason ranking? It shouldn't have ANYTHING to do with it. We're in the top 10 because we have 19 returning starters, including some really elite talent, from a team that looked really good the last time anyone saw them. I don't know if we're really a top 10 team or not, but saying we can't, or shouldn't be, because we haven't had a good last 10 years is just bad logic.