LoudOrange
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 1, 2008
- Messages
- 3,758
- Likes
- 9,390
They were ranked higher? A much better QB in McNown than Outzen?
They had to replace Weinke and we had to replace Jamaal Lewis. They lost, so naturally they pointed to that as their excuse. But I remember FSU fans saying before the game that they liked their chances better with Outzen in there, since he was more mobile than Weinke. They were very confident about Outzen, particularly after his performance against the Gators (which a lot of FSU fans thought would be a sure loss without Weinke). And a lot of the "experts" picked FSU to win the game against us. So the Outzen thing comes off more like an excuse than a big break for us.
The Syracuse PI call was the right call. It's true that such a call is not always ruled the same way by the refs, so in that sense it was a big break for us. It would have been an even bigger break for Syracuse if they had not called it, since the defender definitely made contact with the receiver before the ball got there. Again, Syracuse fans and NE sportswriters made a big deal out of it, but it was the right call.
Burlsworth said after the game that he got his footwork screwed-up and it was his fault he stepped on Stoerner's foot. Billy Ratliff was pushing Burlsworth back hard from the moment of the snap, so he gets credit for contributing to that. I don't know why anyone would try to deny that he played a part. And without Stoerner's foot being stepped on, the fumble doesn't happen (and LMAO @ "inexplicably").
I would agree that we got our fair share of breaks along the way to that NC, which I think is the point you are trying to make. The fact that other contenders (i.e., Ohio State and UCLA) lost games along the way, while we didn't, certainly falls into that category. All Championship teams need a few breaks along the way and we were no different.
Not so fast my friend, it's called anticipation. Burlsworth had been getting beat by Ratliff and walker. Watch the whole game. He knew what was coming and his reaction showed by stepping on Stoerners foot. Closet hog?
You're right on that first point - but they would have been there instead of an FSU that needed that miracle to be there. UCLA would have been a tougher opponent.
UCLA had no defense whatsoever that year. They were all offense, and they didn't play a tough schedule. We would have steamrolled them.
They went on to lose in the Rose Bowl to Wisconsin 38-31 in their next game.
All UCLA had to do was beat Miami the last game of the year, which was a makeup game from a Sept hurricane, and they would have played for the NC
The notion that the DL cause Stoerner's fumble is one of the most hilarious myths in college football. In any pass play, which this one was designed to be a play action rollout, the guards and tackles' first step is back - no one pushed an all American like Bullsworth into Stoerner. Furthermore, no Vol forced Stoerner to inexplicably brace his fall with his ball hand. That's on Stoerner.
Thirdly, the rooster was the 3rd string QB if I recall and hadn't played but a few downs of college football prior to that game - I could be wrong on this butI think I'm right.
We were dang lucky to win that natty. Think about how many things went in our favor:
- the 4th down interference call against Syracuse
- Martin throwing a rainbow to Price against UF that should have been an easy pick
- the walk on or freshman kicker that missed the game tying FG by like 3 inches against UF
- Ohio St and UCLA losing gimme games late in the year to push UT to#1
- Wienke getting hurt before the national title game and FSU having to play "the rooster" at QB who was God awful
- andofcourse the Stoener fumble against a Arkansas team that dominated us for 3 quarters
How about things that went against us? Such as:
1) Losing our leading rusher, Jamal Lewis, for the season vs Auburn. How many National Championship teams have dealt with that?
2) The officials and the CBS announcers for that game Sean McDonough and Terry Donohue missed a crucial call on the snap that went over Arkansas punter Benji Mahan's head in the 4th quarter. He illegally kicked it backward through the end zone. Tennessee should have been given the option of taking the ball half the distance to the goal line from where it was kicked (Tenn would have had a 1st and goal from the 5) but instead Tenn was just awarded a safety. The score was 24-20 at the time. Given the choice, we would have taken the ball, not the safety. The refs blew it.
Your argument about the Peerless TD vs Florida 'should have been an easy pick' is ridiculous. He had his man beaten on a double move.. and Florida's Collins Cooper's missed kick in OT was not even close to the left upright (if that is what you're talking about). Arkansas dominated the 1st half - not the first 3 quarters.
They were ranked higher? A much better QB in McNown than Outzen?
Those facts don't support the agenda of the self loathers.
I think you're trying too hard to establish yourself as the reasonable, objective fan. You've gone beyond that to the point of making unreasonable assumptions about what would have happened in any number of different scenarios. The bottom line is that we won. And it's perfectly alright to feel good about it. Cut yourself some slack.
I think you're trying too hard to establish yourself as the reasonable, objective fan. You've gone beyond that to the point of making unreasonable assumptions about what would have happened in any number of different scenarios. The bottom line is that we won. And it's perfectly alright to feel good about it. Cut yourself some slack.
Well said... and Tennessee went undefeated in '98. Winning the National Championship with two losses like LSU did in '07 (including Kentucky) is luck.
This is the same guy who has zero respect for the victory we had by blowing out a top 15 bowl game and their higher rank. But you can bet your a$$ he will use a higher ranking to bolster his argument to take some shine off of our NC in 98. That's who he is.
The Syracuse PI call was the right call. It's true that such a call is not always ruled the same way by the refs, so in that sense it was a big break for us. It would have been an even bigger break for Syracuse if they had not called it, since the defender definitely made contact with the receiver before the ball got there. Again, Syracuse fans and NE sportswriters made a big deal out of it, but it was the right call
It was called correctly but still big save for us. I don't think I've seen that play in over a decade but wasn't Lewis basically catching it in the flat on a 4th and 10? He would have had to make an amazing play to get the first.
We were dang lucky to win that natty. Think about how many things went in our favor:
- the 4th down interference call against Syracuse
- Martin throwing a rainbow to Price against UF that should have been an easy pick
- the walk on or freshman kicker that missed the game tying FG by like 3 inches against UF
- Ohio St and UCLA losing gimme games late in the year to push UT to#1
- Wienke getting hurt before the national title game and FSU having to play "the rooster" at QB who was God awful
- andofcourse the Stoener fumble against a Arkansas team that dominated us for 3 quarters
The Arkansas punter illegally kicked a bad snap out of the end zone.
The refs mistakenly ruled a Safety and awarded Tennessee 2 pts. Should have been Vols ball inside the Arky 5 yard line with less than 3 minutes to play.