2016 Election Thread Part Deux

#5,405
#5,405
Grand Vol said:
Again, and? How will that drastically reduce it?

And furthermore, how does he plan on doing this?
Click to expand...

Vol8188 said:
How will deleting entire departments drastically reduce the size of the government? Not sure if that's a real question. Some of these things can be legally done through executive action (setting the federal schedule on all drugs to 0), others would need legislation (ending income tax).
Click to expand...

Grand Vol said:
No, I asked how specifically he (Johnson) planned to do it.

Stop avoiding the question. You either know how he's going to do it and can show the rest of us or you're just following him because of the letter behind his name.
Click to expand...

Umm...I feel like you didn't read the post at at all.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#5,409
#5,409
SO back on track..looking forward to see the creative attack ads Trump comes up with to use against HRC and whoever her running mate is. A lot of old negative attack ads and not so nice interviews from other democrats starting to surface again.
 
#5,413
#5,413
Grand Vol said:
Let me ask you this...

Do you honestly believe with all your heart as corrupt as the Clinton family is, such rumors are so outlandish one shouldn't be speculative about them?
Click to expand...


It's been a busy day. And on my way to Vegas in an hour.

To answer your question, the problem is your premise. The only real scandal has been Lewinsky. Everything else has been speculation, almost exclusively by right wing haters and people trying to cash in on other speculation.

Which brings me to my original point in all of this. The far right on the Clintons have overplayed their hand so often that they've drowned out their own legitimate points. It's your own fault no one buys in to it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#5,417
#5,417
lawgator1 said:
It's been a busy day. And on my way to Vegas in an hour.

To answer your question, the problem is your premise. The only real scandal has been Lewinsky. Everything else has been speculation, almost exclusively by right wing haters and people trying to cash in on other speculation.

Which brings me to my original point in all of this. The far right on the Clintons have overplayed their hand so often that they've drowned out their own legitimate points. It's your own fault no one buys in to it.
Click to expand...

You didn't answer the question. Merely did your traditional left wing tap dance and avoid answering.
 
#5,419
#5,419
Grand Vol said:
You didn't answer the question. Merely did your traditional left wing tap dance and avoid answering.
Click to expand...


She's worse than your average politician on the vague answers, the politi-speech double talk. But that doesn't make the rumors more or less true. Especially if they are rumors similar to the tripe you posted yesterday without the first paragraphs clarifying the lack of any factual predicate.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#5,420
#5,420
Septic said:
LOL, every man for himself. I got out when the gettin' was good (aka going from Idlewild to Snowden).

That wasn't an option.
Click to expand...

I live in the Idlewild zone. One of maybe 3 or 4 public schools in the city in which I would ever consider enrolling my children.
 
#5,421
#5,421
Septic said:
Ob do you need it spelled out too? This is embarrassing.

Please tell me that partisan politics hasn't gutted you people of common sense completely?

Are all security measures now going to be conflated with Trumps wall? So dumb.
Click to expand...

Wow the bitterness flows from you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#5,422
#5,422
lawgator1 said:
It's been a busy day. And on my way to Vegas in an hour.

To answer your question, the problem is your premise. The only real scandal has been Lewinsky. Everything else has been speculation, almost exclusively by right wing haters and people trying to cash in on other speculation.

Which brings me to my original point in all of this. The far right on the Clintons have overplayed their hand so often that they've drowned out their own legitimate points. It's your own fault no one buys in to it.
Click to expand...

Last I checked only a third of the country trusts her. The scandals have taken their toll, regardless of whether they're exaggerated by right-wing screechers.

Fortunately for her, she's going against an orange-faced buffoon who has no idea how to run a political campaign. So she has a chance.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#5,423
#5,423
lawgator1 said:
She's worse than your average politician on the vague answers, the politi-speech double talk. But that doesn't make the rumors more or less true. Especially if they are rumors similar to the tripe you posted yesterday without the first paragraphs clarifying the lack of any factual predicate.
Click to expand...

Let me phrase this question a different way since you seem disposed to avoiding it...

Can you really fault anyone for being highly skeptical of the Clinton family's innocence when something like that comes up? It's not like they have been angels and when (not if) their name keeps coming up time and time again with some behavior that's out of the lines of propriety one really has to start wondering what the truth is.

Unless they are a complete partisan hack that will blindly follow whatever they say. For crying out loud, Hillary got busted by the White House today! Not some ultra right wing blogger making **** up. Josh Earnest called the email probe a freakin criminal investigation.

Does this clear things up?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#5,425
#5,425
I wonder if Obama's enthusiastic endorsement of Hillary will put to bed the silly notion that the Clintons and Obama hate each other behind the scenes.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top