2016 Election Thread Part Deux

Agree - labeling revolution/government ousting by force as terrorism is a misunderstanding of terrorism.

Now revolutionaries may or may not use terroristic tactics in their efforts but overthrowing a government by force is not terrorism per se.

:good!:
 
I'm not u turning at all. Overthrowing a government by force is terrorism. Or using the threat of force for political change. Both are terrorism.

What? No it isn't. One is civilian and the other is government. One is to improve life and the other incite chaos
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
no all of the comments you are making are absurd. So you are saying there is no possible way to enforce immigration laws without having a police state. So Spain is a police state as well as all of these countries?

How 65 countries have erected security walls on their borders | Daily Mail Online

Call me crazy, but that ladder doesn't look that sturdy...

2B8B84FC00000578-3205724-image-a-3_1440141217771.jpg


Taking redneck engineering to what even rednecks would consider unsafe levels.
 
Terrorism in it's truest form is the deliberate attack on civilians/unarmed people to incite terror within the population. Starting a revolution and fighting the armed forces of a government is not terrorism.

Terrorism is the use of force or fear for political motivates. We have the second amendment so that we can create fear within the government
 
Agree - labeling revolution/government ousting by force as terrorism is a misunderstanding of terrorism.

Now revolutionaries may or may not use terroristic tactics in their efforts but overthrowing a government by force is not terrorism per se.

What's the difference? I'm truly not seeing one
 
Not voting Dem will get you labeled by some.

Which is why it's absurd for any of you to support banning people on terrorist watch lists from owning guns, unless you believe the president will always be a republican
 
What's the difference? I'm truly not seeing one

Consider our own revolution - our revolutionaries attacked the ruling government's military to defeat them.

They didn't go to England and terrorize civilians to get policy changed.

Using your definition any act of aggression against a ruling government qualifies as terrorism - even if it comes from another government.

Terrorism is generally associated with direct attacks against civilian populations; not governments.

Insurgency is not the same as terrorism. Terrorism is an approach.

Iraqi's defending their country against us isn't an example of terrorism per se
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
A better example would be someone jumps your fence, makes himself comfy on the couch, and tells you he lives there now.

Oh and if you complain you're a racist.

The perp will demand him to make him a sammich.

You won't never get an answer from him, he likes to play games and say stupid sh!t without backing it up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person

VN Store



Back
Top