Vols4us
The Name's John Lee Pettimore
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2011
- Messages
- 24,027
- Likes
- 49,192
Thank you, sir. It's interesting that you mention membership at your past church. Mine is currently around 3500. It grew quite a bit in the last 15 years. When our current pastor came on about 6 years ago, he realized that membership was a "revolving door." He did a survey and found that people quit attending within 3 months of becoming a member. They weren't assimilating.
Our pastor has now required taking a couple of classes and meeting certain staff members before becoming a member. It allows new members to understand the foundation of the UMC and encourage attendance at SS and other activities. Membership is probably slower now, but obviously, the hope is to gain folks who will remain committed.
I always enjoy reading what you post. I don't always agree, but I respect it. No offense to your age, but I consider you one of our "senior members" who I like to read on the many subjects on this forum. God Bless.
Thanks, friend. I'm not always right, but I am usually convinced I am. lol.
Your pastor is doing it the right way IMO. our congregation was smaller, but probably a good example of what you are describing. When our former church was doing it well and growing (600+ members), there were over 250 core members that were very active in many areas and the average worship attendance was over 70% for several years. We had the membership classes as well (important). Had over 100 Jr/Sr high youth in average attendance. You can get a lot done in your community in terms of outreach when the congregation is on the same page and committed to the Lord's cause. You said it - assimilation is key.
Relating to membership; every year we would cull the rolls of members. This also drove that average worship attendance up and gave the senior pastor and lay leadership a better picture of the health of the church. If there was no record or knowledge of attendance of a member over a three year period, we would make every sort of attempt to contact to ask if they wanted to remain on the roll, including asking the congregation for assistance at the annual church conference. If no response we moved it to the Year 2 list. If contacted we would do as requested. When the year 2 list came up, we would go through the same process and move the non-contacted to the Year 3 list. Rinse and repeat Year 3 list. If unable to be located, the person was then removed from membership. At the time, the conference and district appropriations were partially based on total membership. Due to our actions, the Bishop had the methodology changed for the entire conference because it was catching on with other churches and they were paying lesser appropriations.
 
				 
						 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		