Tennbleedsorange
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2009
- Messages
- 256
- Likes
- 119
So we are better than UF on both sides of the ball and we play at home........no excuses for losing to them this year. None.
No way LSU is the best offense in the SEC.
I would say...
Offensively:
1. LSU
2. Tennessee
3. Ole Miss
4. Bama
5. Georgia
6. TAMU
7. Arkansas
8. Florida
9. Auburn
10. Kentucky
11. Miss St
12. South Carolina
13. Vandy
14. Mizzou
Defensively:
1. Bama
2. Tennessee
3. LSU
4. Florida
5. Mizzou
6. Georgia
7. Auburn
8. Ole Miss
9. Miss St
10. Vandy
11. Arkansas
12. TAMU
13. SCAR
14. Kentucky
Granted, this is all pre-season speculation. LSU at the top of the offense depends on how Harris plays. Us at number two on the defense depends on how well we've adjusted to Shoop. ETC.
On paper UTs offense should be 1 no worse than 2.
Defensively 2 no worse than 3. (factoring Shoop)
No reason not to win the east and be plenty good enough to win the conference.
i don't think there's any "sure things" on offense really.
LSU, GA, TN and Bama should all have good to great running games.
FL has WR's and RB's, and maybe their qb situation is addition by subtraction? but the QB is definitely a "?". GA may have the highest ceiling...
none of them, TN with probably the best shot at given the experience factor, have a proven passing game.
Ole Miss has potential as well....Kelly should have a good year, just not sold that Ole Miss will be a 10 win team again.
ARK replacing their QB, but should also have a solid running game.
it's right there for the taking. i have to think there's a half dozen teams in the SEC thinking "why not us?"....
The QB cycle favors UT. The better teams either don't have one or are waiting for one to show up. Having said that, for UT to win the conference Dobbs needs to take a substantial step (along with the WRs) but he shouldn't be making mistakes that green QB will either.
The defense has plenty of talent, experience, and depth (less LB) and I believe they have a better DC leading them.
i agree. but i will say this...our schedule is might tougher than either FL or GA's....if there's a path for either of them to win the East, it really only takes one of them beating us, and we still have the west opponents to deal with.
i think it's unlikely, but still possible for us to lose 3 of the 4 games during that Sept/Oct stretch. IF that were to happen, it opens the door for the winner of the UGA/FL game to go to ATL.
bottom line.....if we're going to split that 4 games....it'd be better to win the 1st two and gag the other two.
FL's losable games TN, LSU, GA and ARK
GA's...TN, Aub, OLe Miss, FL
TN's. FL, GA, aTm, Bama
should be interesting to say the least. but is there a TN fan that wouldn't trade West Schedules with FL or GA????
agreed. my two biggest concerns are the passing game improvement you mentioned, and the gauntlet we have to face in that 4 game stretch. i look at what our competition has to navigate, vs. what we do, and it at least gives me enough pause to think this isn't as sure a thing as i'd like to believe....
a lot really depends on how good, or bad, you think either of those two are going to be?UTs west schedule is tougher followed by UF and UGA in that group. I think UGA is the question. UF has more questions to answer but that hasn't mattered in a long time either.
i agree. but i will say this...our schedule is might tougher than either FL or GA's....if there's a path for either of them to win the East, it really only takes one of them beating us, and we still have the west opponents to deal with.
i think it's unlikely, but still possible for us to lose 3 of the 4 games during that Sept/Oct stretch. IF that were to happen, it opens the door for the winner of the UGA/FL game to go to ATL.
bottom line.....if we're going to split that 4 games....it'd be better to win the 1st two and gag the other two.
FL's losable games TN, LSU, GA and ARK
GA's...TN, Aub, OLe Miss, FL
TN's. FL, GA, aTm, Bama
should be interesting to say the least. but is there a TN fan that wouldn't trade West Schedules with FL or GA????
LSU first on offense? Can I have some of that crack you're smoking?
I'm not saying we're first, but LSU is one sprained ankle from scoring less than 10 points a game, and they're already one dimensional.
Until they find a QB they will barely be a top 5 SEC offense.