butchna
Sit down and tell me all about it...way over there
- Joined
- Jan 6, 2013
- Messages
- 106,981
- Likes
- 225,034
Looks like #7 on the ground there to me. It's definitely not a 13.
That's not the wide open pass you're referring to numb nuts.
Lol at suggesting our two senior SEC safeties were liabilities. Similar asinine thoughts:
Hurd's a weakness cause he can't hit a home run.
Dobbs' a weakness cause he's inaccurate downfield.
Barnett's a weakness cause he starts slow.
Sutton's a weakness cause he doesn't get enough picks.
Wolf's a weakness cause he doesn't get enough catches.
We were struggling for those games that McNeil was feared lost. He stabilized after he returned and it was noticeable. Why'd our performance similarly struggle when Randolph had to sit out halfs with those targeting calls? Most likely because Jancek put too much on those positions and you needed a lot of football smarts AND experience to function there. That should shift under Shoop but don't freak out the first time Kelly,Berry,Abernathy, Gaulden,Griffin or Warrior whiffs on one or 30 attempts. As Goliath said before the migraine..."**it happens".inch:
We are better but over the later half of the year Randolph was blowing ball carriers up. People saying he was a liability may want to watch a lot of the latter half of the year.
Lol at suggesting our two senior SEC safeties were liabilities. Similar asinine thoughts:
Hurd's a weakness cause he can't hit a home run.
Dobbs' a weakness cause he's inaccurate downfield.
Barnett's a weakness cause he starts slow.
Sutton's a weakness cause he doesn't get enough picks.
Wolf's a weakness cause he doesn't get enough catches.
We had no experience behind those two and Kelly. It was arguably our weakest position on defense. I love Randolph and McNeil for leadership and toughness but they both lacked athleticism and were abused against teams that could pass the ball. I don't think that's debatable.
Both were solid players but not playmakers. They lacked quickness and speed which is not their fault. We have better athletes now and we will be much more difficult to pass against.
Dobbs does have a weakness with accuracy. The rest here are nonsense which have been posted on this site. I get your point but many are taking the defense of McNeil and Randolph because we didn't have better options. I get that. The facts are that we do now.
You're missing the point. Every player has their weaknesses, but to label them as a weakness/liability is laughable. I don't disagree that we will eventually upgrade, but they were good SEC players and we were a better team with them on the field.
I think Shoop's scheme uses athleticism better than Jancek's...and he teaches positioning better. The games where Kelly and Berry were used more displayed them out of position at key times...Bowling Green exploited that (which turned out to not be just us). At their best, Randolph and McNeil almost seemed to compensate despite their instruction...years more trial&error (specially that 2012 season!). I'm not arguing that better athletes won't make bigger plays...they just wouldn't have in last year's scheme...IMO.
I think Shoop's scheme uses athleticism better than Jancek's...and he teaches positioning better. The games where Kelly and Berry were used more displayed them out of position at key times...Bowling Green exploited that (which turned out to not be just us). At their best, Randolph and McNeil almost seemed to compensate despite their instruction...years more trial&error (specially that 2012 season!). I'm not arguing that better athletes won't make bigger plays...they just wouldn't have in last year's scheme...IMO.