Crookruss
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2010
- Messages
- 1,291
- Likes
- 734
This is right on. McNeil was also a liability in pass game. He was a big hitter that did great in gang tackling situations.
Randolph was a great leader and had others in position but he was not a consistent playmaker.
Both guys had liabilities as players. Neither are elite athletes, but, particularly with Randolph, the defense was better with them on the field.
That's the problem with D4H - he thinks a guy has to be a future pro bowler to contribute.
Robinsons killing it IMO. I am betting on them taking Ramsey with their 1st pick.
I appreciate the contributions of both Randolph and McNeil at Tennessee. It wasn't long ago that Randolph was one of our top 3 players on defense. And McNeil's comeback story and pick against WCU was one of the highlights of the season. (Also, I may or may not be biased towards Randolph due to meeting his family prior to the TaxSlayer Bowl)
That said, we now have better athletes across the board than what we had when those two committed to UT, and that includes the safety position.
I appreciate the contributions of both Randolph and McNeil at Tennessee. It wasn't long ago that Randolph was one of our top 3 players on defense. And McNeil's comeback story and pick against WCU was one of the highlights of the season. (Also, I may or may not be biased towards Randolph due to meeting his family prior to the TaxSlayer Bowl)
That said, we now have better athletes across the board than what we had when those two committed to UT, and that includes the safety position.