Recruiting Forum Football Talk XXV

Status
Not open for further replies.
#777
#777
BruinVol said:
Perhaps or he omitted the other part for some reason

Without reading hard to know
Click to expand...

No way they would only ask about the second incident, unless you are saying they didn't know about the first, which I highly doubt

And if he omitted the first, then he lied. Or he is lying now.

Lie of omission is still a lie.
 
#778
#778
Firing CBJ does more harm than good. We're not going to win this PR battle. Bowles is not credible and is clearly hostile. Jane Doe IV's story will be shredded in the criminal case, and Jane Doe V is a convenient witness. We might as well ignore it and wait for the next shoe to drop. There will be one. This is a strategically planned attack, so it's best to let counsel handle it and focus on spring practice.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#779
#779
engineerVOL said:
Josh Ward...

Alexis Johnson's attorney tweeted this Thursday: "Alleged victim didn't want to prosecute." She's now a plaintiff in the lawsuit against UT.

Seriously.
Click to expand...

If my daughter was assaulted, I would either want the scum dead or in jail. I am beginning to think these women just want to have Jerry Mcguires motto.
 
#781
#781
JacketVol said:
If my daughter was assaulted, I would either want the scum dead or in jail. I am beginning to think these women just want to have Jerry Mcguires motto.
Click to expand...

Yeah. Literally no reason to drop those charges in favor of joining the lawsuit unless your whole plan is to get paid. Is there a difference in the two cases other than monetary value?
 
#782
#782
VolsnCards5 said:
No way they would only ask about the second incident, unless you are saying they didn't know about the first, which I highly doubt

And if he omitted the first, then he lied. Or he is lying now.

Lie of omission is still a lie.
Click to expand...

Disagree on lying by omission.
 
#785
#785
BruinVol said:
Disagree on lying by omission.
Click to expand...

"Also known as a continuing misrepresentation, a lie by omission occurs when an important fact is left out in order to foster a misconception. Lying by omission includes failures to correct pre-existing misconceptions."
 
#792
#792
butchna said:
It was announced before this broke.
Click to expand...

I know. I just think it's pouring gas on the mattress unless he has a newsworthy announcement. Like maybe OJ's getting early release and will be joining the staff as quality assurance coach-- something like that.
 
#795
#795
BruinVol said:
Zero chance you can be held for perjury if you answer truthfully for not telling the rest of the story that wasn't asked about

That's ignorant
Click to expand...

In fact you are told by attorneys to only answer the question as asked while not offering any unsolicited information.

Bruin's right, without having both to compare we really don't know.
 
#796
#796
volatil said:
It's also ignorant to assume we know how the question was asked.
Click to expand...

Agreed which is why I have posted just that

I am only saying the kid isn't for sure a liar and changing his story

We don't know unless we read the statement
 
#798
#798
BruinVol said:
Agreed which is why I have posted just that

I am only saying the kid isn't for sure a liar and changing his story

We don't know unless we read the statement
Click to expand...

You're making an assumption. VQ reported he testified under oath "no assault occurred".

I know you like to argue semantics but that's pretty clear to me.
 
#799
#799
I highly doubt Butch called Bowles a traitor because he turned in a rape victim. More than likely Butch got the story from Maggits and rest of team that AJ was innocent and Bowles is jealous his girl got banged and told her to call it rape. That's only way I can seem him literally saying that based off the side of the story the team believed at time
 
#800
#800
BruinVol said:
Zero chance you can be held for perjury if you answer truthfully for not telling the rest of the story that wasn't asked about

That's ignorant
Click to expand...

I'm sorry Bruin...I don't believe you have legal chops. I know I don't, but if you previously swear in an affidavit that you weren't assaulted, you can't turn around almost two years later and say "I meant THIS time". That's omission and doesn't fly. He lied then or he's lying now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
New posts
Status
Not open for further replies.
Advertisement





Back
Top