UTProf
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 24, 2010
- Messages
- 13,386
- Likes
- 33,305
I do not handle cases in that area of law, but defamation is protected in litigation. A high majority of cases revolve around "disputed facts," and the legal system would have a problem if people could file defamation acts based on legal argument. A legal case by definition is a controversy.
That said, I believe there is a movement and some law to support a payment of fees and costs if a lawsuit is deemed frivolous. Not actually having any direct knowledge of this case, my guess is there is some proof that these type of things happened. Factually, it could revolve around how UT reacted to the incidents. It could end up being a legal issue. Even if the facts are true, do they still make UT liable? Does UT promote an atmosphere of sexual misconduct just because several players, at different times, were being investigated or charged with a sex crime?
To sum it up, while I don't care for the suit and believe UT should vigorously defend it, I don't believe these lawyers are just making up things and being totally reckless and unethical.
Seems like they are purposefully trying to drag UT through the mud.
Which is why you don't settle unless you have too much to hide. You buck up and play the game. Get public opinion and the media on your side as much as possible. None of us want anything to damage the football program. But you don't roll at the first sign of trouble.
youtube link to joes video from above
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bYRtgeiutzA
as opposed to the tantrum
![]()
Actually, UT probably will settle-- and that decision likely will be made by the university's insurance carrier(s). UT will seek coverage under multiple liability policies, causing UT's counsel to work with insurance attorneys and risk management consultants to reduce exposure and mitigate losses.
I'm sure UT has a general liability policy, professional liability policy and D&O liability policy, among others. The reason Cheek, Hart, CBJ et al were named is financially-driven. The wider the net, the bigger the pot and the larger the settlement. It's a large-scale money grab. Nothing more.
Actually, UT probably will settle-- and that decision likely will be made by the university's insurance carrier(s). UT will seek coverage under multiple liability policies, causing UT's counsel to work with insurance attorneys and risk management consultants to reduce exposure and mitigate losses.
I'm sure UT has a general liability policy, professional liability policy and D&O liability policy, among others. The reason Cheek, Hart, CBJ et al were named is financially-driven. The wider the net, the bigger the pot and the larger the settlement. It's a large-scale money grab. Nothing more.
Do we know they are insured? Just asking. Most entities funded by tax dollars are government related and self funded. In that case the insurance company would be an administrator and advisor.
Penn State spent $110M in settlement, legal fees, fines and other costs associated with its sex abuse lawsuits-- and they didn't have enough insurance to cover it all. UT absolutely has multiple liability policies. Will it be enough? Who knows? But the university and its legal counsel had to have seen this coming and prepared for what's going to be a nasty legal battle.
I guess it would make sense to have a high deductible and self fund the smaller stuff with layered coverage over top. Do you think the PSU and Vandy situations are what helped fuel this? Seems like this is a playbook approach to me.
I'm not sure if this makes me feel better or worse about this case.
From yet another article:
"UT -- which retained a lawyer from Neal & Harwell, a firm known for defending the Ford Pinto and Exxon Valdez -- denies the allegations."
Penn State spent $110M in settlement, legal fees, fines and other costs associated with its sex abuse lawsuits-- and they didn't have enough insurance to cover it all. UT absolutely has multiple liability policies. Will it be enough? Who knows? But the university and its legal counsel had to have seen this coming and prepared for what's going to be a nasty legal battle.
