Vol8188
revolUTion in the air!
- Joined
- Mar 19, 2011
- Messages
- 52,905
- Likes
- 52,797
Of course he does. He plans to say whatever he needs to say to get elected.
Within the past 6 months he's stated that he wants to deport all illegals, and that he also supports amnesty after he builds his fence. So he speaks out of both sides and says whatever is necessary at the time to pander to the given audience. That's the plan.
"No immigrant is competing for your job". The point seemed to be that the "elite" the author is referring to don't understand the issues illegal immigration creates. One of the issues he pointed to was losing your job.
How do you feel about vouchers for parents to send kids to private schools?If uneducated workers are taking your job, get an education and/or work harder. I have no sympathy for them in that respect. I don't support illegal immigration, but I'd have no problem accepting even unskilled immigrants. Competition in the work force isn't a bad thing.
How do you feel about vouchers for parents to send kids to private schools?
Idk, honestly. My only real issue with it is that public schools would then only get the kids that private schools don't want (special education services and health issues that the private schools aren't equipped to handle).
Due to a lower demand and lower funding the number of public schools would decrease and the concentration and class sizes for the special needs students would shoot up drastically. They would also get a lower quality teacher, because very few would want to put up with that kind of clientele.
But honestly, the current inclusion model for special needs students is a disservice to the higher level students in those classes and actually holds them back in many ways. I'm also of the opinion that we shouldn't be educating all people and that this view that education is a right is part of the issue. For example alternative schools shouldn't exist. If you can't do what's asked of you; then tax payer money shouldn't be wasted educating you. Because only those willing to learn can be taught.
I struggle with that last part. The kids there up to 20 who you're correct, in many cases are being babysat. The reason I like them being there, is because this is the best their life will ever be. They will never have true peers and the sense of belonging and fitting in again in their lives.
For the alternative schools: they're spending their days hanging with the same kids they'd be running the streets with. Shut em down and use the money to hire better teachers in the other schools.
And we are on the same page with trade schools. Many of those same degrees offered by trade schools and community colleges could be earned while in high school.
I think the future of education is more online based so that it can be more individualized. Students will stay with kids their age (no one would get held back) but everyone would work on things at their given level. So you may be 16 and working on 5th grade math. Meanwhile other 16 year olds www taking trig and earning credit through the local community college. The key is building relations with local trade schools and community colleges to increase to availability of online curriculum
Edit: one last note. We now call the most severe kids, life skills students. And their goal is to literally learn how to take care of themselves and live as independently as possible. I'm a major support of those classes and attend their prom and other events annually. I had a relative through marriage who had Down's syndrome. She loved going to school because she was an equal amongst her peers. She had a boyfriend. She had friends. It was great for her. She'll never experience that again.
If uneducated workers are taking your job, get an education and/or work harder. I have no sympathy for them in that respect. I don't support illegal immigration, but I'd have no problem accepting even unskilled immigrants. Competition in the work force isn't a bad thing.
He's right actually. Teachers'
unions have been bending the taxpayers over for years and in the process creating a defacto monopoly. I was actually surprised at your answer being somewhat pro voucher. Maybe there is some hope for you after all.
Probably because pay is so poor.
Is it really that poor? What does it come out to per hour? My HS teachers showed up at 7:30 (if that) and left by 3:30. Add a little prepping at home but then account for 3 months off + in kind pay....
When I was in college the average starting teacher was making more per hour than the average starting econ major* in the open market, and that's a good degree.
*they tend to go be donkeys at financial firms for 70 hour/week x 5 years
Is it really that poor? What does it come out to per hour? My HS teachers showed up at 7:30 (if that) and left by 3:30. Add a little prepping at home but then account for 3 months off + in kind pay....
When I was in college the average starting teacher was making more per hour than the average starting econ major in the open market, and that's a good degree.
Is it really that poor? What does it come out to per hour? My HS teachers showed up at 7:30 (if that) and left by 3:30. Add a little prepping at home but then account for 3 months off + in kind pay....
When I was in college the average starting teacher was making more per hour than the average starting econ major* in the open market, and that's a good degree.
*they tend to go be donkeys at financial firms for 70 hour/week x 5 years
Is it really that poor? What does it come out to per hour? My HS teachers showed up at 7:30 (if that) and left by 3:30. Add a little prepping at home but then account for 3 months off + in kind pay....
When I was in college the average starting teacher was making more per hour than the average starting econ major* in the open market, and that's a good degree.
*they tend to go be donkeys at financial firms for 70 hour/week x 5 years
