Manning linked to HGH by Documentary (key witness has recanted)

#679
#679
My mother took hgh to lose weight. So it is very feasible that Ashley was taking it. In fact I know a lot of people who took it to lose weight. It was a fad for awhile and they did lose weight!
 
Last edited:
#682
#682
IngloriousBastard said:
This is pretty unfair to both her and him. She shouldn't have to release any information regarding her health. A story was made up, has been recanted by the guy who said it, the team that worked with him said it was untrue, and so did the office where the guy worked at. Actually he didn't even work there until years later, and even then as an unpaid intern. He isn't going to know precious company secrets such as these. Get real.

You symbolize all that is wrong with the world these days. Everything is one big witch hunt based on limited or inaccurate information, which is then perpetuated to be truth. It's sickening.
Click to expand...

Bunch of smokescreen IMO. I think Peyton did it and I hope they hammer his butt to a wall for it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#684
#684
Dobbs 4 Heisman said:
LOL. I bet 99% of you haven't even seen the documentary.

Peyton Manning is the best QB I've ever seen. I'm not a Peyton fan since his time at UT was before I started watching football. I did however grow up a Titans fan and did watch him destroy the titans all the time. That is where my respect for him as a football player comes from.

Maybe it's because I'm not a blind Manning fan that I can look at the story objectively. If you watch the documentary, I don't know how you can't come away thinking something happened.

This isn't some middle eastern plot to destroy Peyton Manning. This is just a good investigation that happened to name a guy who is a hero for many around here.

Maybe it takes someone like me that is emotionally detached from this to see it for what it is.
Click to expand...

Why should anyone watch the documentary? It's a farce and I'm not going to support it by giving that piece of garbage a click. I bet you believe everything that is in Ancient Aliens too.
 
#686
#686
Dobbs 4 Heisman said:
The fact Al-Jazeera welcomes a lawsuit by Manning speaks volumes. Peyton will look guilty if he doesn't follow through on it now.
Click to expand...

No it doesn't. It's hard to prove malice and they know it. It has zero bearing on his guilt.


Sometimes I hate that the Internet gives people like you a voice.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#687
#687
Remy said:
Ashley Manning is a private citizen, non celebrity, and has a right to privacy. None of us including you have the right to demand she prove or reveal anything about her medical history, conditions, or procedures she has had.
Click to expand...

I just know of HGH to be a PED. I have no clue if it serves any purpose for anything else. Having said that if it does help with some kind of disease or womens issue it would be a shame if she had to come out and say why she needed it.
 
#690
#690
Criminal probe in future?

http://m.nydailynews.com/sports/football/clinic-peyton-manning-hgh-report-contradictory-info-article-1.2479201
 
#692
#692
velovol said:
I just know of HGH to be a PED. I have no clue if it serves any purpose for anything else. Having said that if it does help with some kind of disease or womens issue it would be a shame if she had to come out and say why she needed it.
Click to expand...

It does. What Manny Ramirez got busted for was used to treat infertility in WOMEN.
 
#694
#694
HGH was banned much earlier than the article indicates. IF true, the dates could be off by many years, as the substance would have been banned. I originally read the article, and took the original banned date as accurate, but if one spends a few minutes researching the facts (as I should have to start with) they'll find HGH is not now/nor has it been okay for a much longer time than was indicated. This is a huge error on the part of Al, and as it is one of the easiest to check, it brings to question the validity of the rest of the story.
 
#695
#695
I40flyer said:
HGH was banned much earlier than the article indicates. IF true, the dates could be off by many years, as the substance would have been banned. I originally read the article, and took the original banned date as accurate, but if one spends a few minutes researching the facts (as I should have to start with) they'll find HGH is not now/nor has it been okay for a much longer time than was indicated. This is a huge error on the part of Al, and as it is one of the easiest to check, it brings to question the validity of the rest of the story.
Click to expand...
The NFL didn't ban HGH until 2011....like the article states and even then, they didn't have a test that the NFLPA and the NFL could agree on until 2014.
 
#696
#696
Now that this nonstory has been effectively debunked, I won't even click on this thread anymore. Since I participated in it I would never deign to condemn those that continue to feed the trolls. If you're of like mind, I'd encourage you to ignore thread...which I'm enroute. Later rednecks. :wavey:
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#697
#697
butchna said:
Now that this nonstory has been effectively debunked, I won't even click on this thread anymore. Since I participated in it I would never deign to condemn those that continue to feed the trolls. If you're of like mind, I'd encourage you to ignore thread...which I'm enroute. Later rednecks. :wavey:
Click to expand...

Lol no it has just begun.
 
#698
#698
butchna said:
Now that this nonstory has been effectively debunked, I won't even click on this thread anymore. Since I participated in it I would never deign to condemn those that continue to feed the trolls. If you're of like mind, I'd encourage you to ignore thread...which I'm enroute. Later rednecks. :wavey:
Click to expand...

No way you can avoid it. You like to cropdust too much.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement



Back
Top