While everyone emphasized the fact that we led in all our losses, each of those four was a very different story. The Oklahoma game was squandering a big lead against a better team because of a conservative game plan. The UF game was squandering a big lead against an inferior team because of an inability to make crucial stops. The Arkansas game was just getting outplayed by a more physical group. The Alabama game was holding a much better team in check with an opportunity to win it late, but talent ultimately winning out.
It's worth noting that we didn't allow any big time comebacks after UF. Yes, we had a 14-0 lead on Arky, but that was early and after EB doing what EB does on a kickoff. Alabama was a one point lead. We almost screwed up the South Carolina game, but unlike against UF and OU, we found a way to get it done when things seemed to be turning against us. That, to me, is a sign that the staff learned lessons from those early two fourth quarter meltdowns.
And, really, the UF game was very different in my mind from OU. We played conservative as we could the second half against the Sooners. I felt like the game plan against Florida was considerably more aggressive; we just failed to make a stop when we had to. You can quibble with a call here, a call there in the Florida game, but it was a different story than with Oklahoma. That, again, points to growth and adaptation.