Rasputin_Vol
"Slava Ukraina"
- Joined
- Aug 14, 2007
- Messages
- 71,943
- Likes
- 39,721
honestly, if I felt the way you guys appear to, I wouldn't be in this country. :twocents:
Home is home. Just because it is populated with a bunch of tyranny loving police worshipping sycophants does not mean it isn't still our preferred place to live.
Think of it this way. You live in an old farm house whose foundation has been deteriorating for quite some time. You love that house because it is where your family has lived from generation to generation for over a hundred years. Should you just leave if the foundation is compromised? Should you bury your head in the sand and refuse to acknowledge the foundation as an issue? Or should you try to fix the foundation? By your logic, we should just leave it and allow the idiotic in-laws to maintain it even though they are completely oblivious to the undermined foundation.
CarlPickens: "Listen, I don't agree with what the cop did, but none of this would have happened if the guy had just obeyed orders. It is really his own fault he got murdered by this officer"
considering that fixing the foundations would probably cost more than the house is worth with good foundations, yeah I would still consider leaving. and that any fix would likely drastically change the house as to be unrecognizable, again yeah it becomes a relevant topic of discussion.
The problem I have with you is that you are yelling as loud as you can that there are foundation issues, yet your fix is to simply remove the foundations. No foundation, no foundation problems. What seems to be beyond any argument I have heard is what takes their place.
There's the problem. In this metaphor, you view the police as the foundation. In my mind, liberty is the foundation. Liberty is eroding. Police state is a symptom of that problem. We need to fix liberty, not necessarily fix the police explicitly without being mindful of an end goal of restoring liberty.
I want this country to be land of the free, you want it to be land of the people who are given enough creature comforts and security to be tricked into believing they are free.
I would be very interested to know what the start of all this was and why the cops felt the need to jeopardize the lives of everyone else on the roads for...
In an interview with the Guardian, Dixon said she and Few had been bickering at a local pool hall shortly before the incident and that Few left to pick up his son at a relatives house. Later, Dixon said, Few pulled up next to her at a stop light and asked her to go home with him. I wouldnt do it, Dixon said. Im stubborn.
According to the Guardian, it was moments later that Dixon saw two marshals carsmarked in black and whiteapproaching from behind with their lights flashing. She looked into Fews car as he pulled away, and he was pointing at his sons head, indicating that he was in the car and he wasnt sure what to do.
Dixon told the Guardian that Few was afraid of the marshals because he and and one of the marshals on the scene had a prior personal conflict.
CarlPickens: "Listen, I don't agree with what the cop did, but none of this would have happened if the guy had just obeyed orders. It is really his own fault he got murdered by this officer"