2016 Election

[n_huffhines]

He can't build a consensus within his own party to get anything done. He's not a salesman and a politician wanting to radically change things needs to be a salesman.

Getting nothing done is so much better than the alternative. Also, he doesn't need congress to repeal Ex Orders, manage foreign relations, etc...

 

[VolsNSkinsFan]

Americans love a winner. Americans will not tolerate a loser. Americans despise cowards. Americans play to win all of the time.

This is why Trump is "winning"

 

[MercyPercy]

A lot of dumb people love rhetoric, no surprise there.

 

[FLVOL69]

A lot of dumb people love rhetoric, no surprise there.

The last two elections prove that.. I

 

[volfanjustin]

A lot of dumb people love rhetoric, no surprise there.

hope and change?

 

[Septic]

A lot of dumb people love rhetoric, no surprise there.

 

[MercyPercy]

Can't talk about Trump without the clown patrol getting upset and bringing up Obama. Never fails. It's like a Pavlovian response.

 

[Mtntrout]

Can't talk about Trump without the clown patrol getting upset and bringing up Obama. Never fails. It's like a Pavlovian response.

Except from the other end.

 

[BeecherVol]

Can't talk about Trump without the clown patrol getting upset and bringing up Obama. Never fails. It's like a Pavlovian response.

Wasn't much different with Obama being followed up by "Well Bush...."

It is what it is.

 

[MercyPercy]

Wasn't much different with Obama being followed up by "Well Bush...."

It is what it is.

So.. do the same thing you hate that others do?

Interesting tactic.

 

[BeecherVol]

So.. do the same thing you hate that others do?

Interesting tactic.

Hate? Meh. Just ironic to me.

 

[n_huffhines]

"If you're eager for war there's 10 other [candidates] I can recommend," Paul said. "If you're eager for war there will always be a Bush or Clinton for you."

Paul: 'If you're eager for war' vote for other candidates | Washington Examiner

 

[Kingston Vol]

"If you're eager for war there's 10 other [candidates] I can recommend," Paul said. "If you're eager for war there will always be a Bush or Clinton for you."

Paul: 'If you're eager for war' vote for other candidates | Washington Examiner

The thing is, the American electorate IS ready for war. Lot of idiots out there.

 

[Vol8188]

"If you're eager for war there's 10 other [candidates] I can recommend," Paul said. "If you're eager for war there will always be a Bush or Clinton for you."

Paul: 'If you're eager for war' vote for other candidates | Washington Examiner

I would like to see an entire commercial along those lines:

"If you're eager for more national debt"

"If you're eager to see your constitutional rights taken away"

Just an entire list of things that seperate Paul from the field.

 

[Kingston Vol]

Poll: Biden outperforms Hillary in general election; Trump leads GOP field - Nick Gass - POLITICO

 

[hog88]

"If you're eager for war there's 10 other [candidates] I can recommend," Paul said. "If you're eager for war there will always be a Bush or Clinton for you."

Paul: 'If you're eager for war' vote for other candidates | Washington Examiner

Still hasn't figured it out has he?

 

[hog88]

I would like to see an entire commercial along those lines:

"If you're eager for more national debt"

"If you're eager to see your constitutional rights taken away"

Just an entire list of things that seperate Paul from the field.

Any accomplishments to list? Serious question, I researched him a little last night and came up with nothing of note.

 

[Vol8188]

Still hasn't figured it out has he?

That warmongering is important to winning over GOP voters?

 

[hog88]

That warmongering is important to winning over GOP voters?

That he needs to be able to work with others.

 

[Vol8188]

Any accomplishments to list? Serious question, I researched him a little last night and came up with nothing of note.

I'm more concerned with what a candidate stands for then I am their ability to work nicely with the rest of congress.

As much as people complain about politicians, you think we'd want someone different.

 

[FLVOL69]

I'm more concerned with what a candidate stands for then I am their ability to work nicely with the rest of congress.

As much as people complain about politicians, you think we'd want someone different.

Why do you think Trump and Carson are leading? And Bernie

 

[Vol8188]

That he needs to be able to work with others.

Haven't you and the rest of the board admonished GOP leadership for working with Obama or our formerly democratic congress on multiple occasions? About two years, compromise was a four letter word on this board.

 

[Vol8188]

Why do you think Trump and Carson are leading? And Bernie

It's not because they're "anti politicians" if that's your claim.

 

[FLVOL69]

Haven't you and the rest of the board admonished GOP leadership for working with Obama or our formerly democratic congress on multiple occasions? About two years, compromise was a four letter word on this board.

There's been no compromise over the last seven years, only capitulation.

 

[hog88]

I'm more concerned with what a candidate stands for then I am their ability to work nicely with the rest of congress.

As much as people complain about politicians, you think we'd want someone different.

I do, however as I've said before if he can't build any kind of consensus to enact his ideas he's hot air.